My Books and Novels are Free
For those interested all of my books and novels are free to download on most digital platforms right now. If you’ve been wanting to read the Lazarus Ciphers or one of my other books, head on over to Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Apple or one of the other many digital retailers.
Category Archives: Biblical History
Psalm 92: Hebrew Poetry of Words and Numbers
Over two thousand years ago, a Hebrew Psalmist wrote the beautiful words of Psalm 92 in honor of Yahweh and His Sabbath. The title of the psalm is a Song for the Sabbath day. Its first line tells us it is “good to give thanks unto Yahweh and to sing praises unto thy name…”.
This psalm is a song of praise, gladness, and faith in Yahweh. Beautiful, to be sure, but there is more to this psalm than meets the casual observer’s eye on first reading.
The psalmist took this psalm and organized it beyond just its words and their meaning. Hidden below the Hebrew poetic lines is a numerical structure that emphasizes the author’s theme and lifts the words into a different realm of praise and honor.
As noted in its title, Psalm 92 is a Song for the Sabbath day. The Sabbath, in Biblical context, is the 7th day, and as such, the number seven has a literal and symbolic link to this psalm. To emphasize this connection, the psalmist penned seven occurrences of the name of Yahweh.
As scholars like Casper Labuschange and others have noted, some passages of Scripture, especially the Psalms, are written in Menorah patterns, with the central verse often of significance. In this psalm, that pattern takes the form of a 7+1+7 verse structure. Again the number seven is prominent.
The structure of the psalm is further enhanced by the central use of the name Yahweh in verse 8. There are three occurrences of His name in the first seven verses and three occurrences in the last seven verses (3+1+3=7).
Beyond the verse structure and use of Yahweh’s name in the psalm, we also see a design in the word and letter counts of the passage. The first seven verses are exactly 52 words (2×26), and the last seven verses also have 52 words. This again is another way of honoring the “name” of Yahweh because the Hebrew letter value of Yahweh’s name is 26.
Scholars who explore the logotechnical aspects of the Hebrew text described how some of the authors of the Old Testament used word or letter count, verse structure, and name usage to seal or mark passages of the Old Testament with a sort of divine stamp. The psalmist here in Psalm 92 does so in a most elegant manner.
The following chart shows the numerical arrangement of the verse, word, and letter structure of the passage:
Finally, it is the letter structure by which the psalmist leaves no doubt about the focus of this psalm. There are a total of 443 letters in the 108 words of this psalm. This means that a single letter, the 222nd, is the exact numerical center of this psalm. This focal point, or pin if you will, is the letter “waw” in the name of Yahweh in verse 8. There are 221 words before this letter and 221 after (221+1+221).
It is worth noting here that the letter “waw” has the meaning of hook, peg, nail, or pin. In other words, one might look at this letter’s numerical placement as the means by which the psalmist connected the structure of the psalm and focused its numerical and literary artistry on the holy name of Yahweh.
For more on the numerical structure of Psalm 92, I recommend Casper Laubuschanges logotechnical analysis of the psalm. This article is based upon his original work here: http://www.labuschagne.nl/ps092.pdf
The Lazarus Ciphers
It has been over two years since I’ve last shared with you here at my blog, and I’ve missed the privilege. I have been busy with family, life, work, and writing. Time has passed in a blur.
I haven’t posted anything here because I’ve been working on my most ambitious writing project to date. It’s a new novel I’ve called The Lazarus Ciphers.
Almost three years ago I woke up one morning with the idea for this novel in my head. It took me another 7 months to figure out the 7 ciphers and riddles around which this novel is built and then nearly two years now, to write, edit and publish the project. I am thrilled and relieved to finally be able to share this story with you.
This is a story about faith, failure, and the redeeming power of God’s love. In writing this novel, one of the questions continually before my mind is, what would I be willing to do if I had the opportunity to reach from the grave, and one last time share the good news of Yahweh’s Salvation – his Yeshua, with a lost family member, a friend, or a stranger.
The Lazarus Ciphers is my answer to that question. My hope is that this story inspires you with the power of God’s love, and the hope and security the faith in that love brings us all.
Warm regards to you all,
William
From the Back Cover:
John Plummer refused to abandon hope for his children, even in death. He left behind…
A briefcase full of Secrets
An evil his two children may not escape
Seven Ciphered riddles that must be solved
An inheritance that may not be attained
A book that holds the Key
In the darkest hour of their lives, Cadence and Timbre Plummer find an unlikely path forward in the expectation of an inheritance their father may have placed out of their reach. Their troubled pasts stalking them, the brother and sister race to break the biblical ciphers that stand between them and their legacy. As the deadline to solve the ciphers approaches, they discover a staggering truth about themselves, their father, and his seven Lazarus Ciphers.
When all else failed, faith found a way.
To read a free preview of the novel:
Direct Preview Link: The Lazrus Ciphers
Direct Link: The Lazarus Cipher
An Oath, the Book of Words, & Daniel 9
Authors Note:
This article will explore the profound influence the book of Deuteronomy and the story of Abraham & Isaac in Genesis 22 had on the numerical and literary framework of Daniel 9. May you be blessed (barak) by these words (dabar).
A Book of Words
In most English versions of the Bible, the 5th book is titled Deuteronomy. The etymology of this word comes from the Greek deuteros and nomos – literally meaning the Second Law. In Hebrew, the 5th book of the Bible is titled, Devarim (דברים) and comes from the Hebrew devar (dabar) and means “Words” or “The Words”.
Deuteronomy opens on the 1st day of the 11th month, of the 40th year of Israel’s wandering. Israel is camped in the wilderness on the other side of the Jordan river in preparation for entering the Promised Land. Here at the end of the 40 years in the wilderness, with the Promised Land in sight, Moses for the last time, speaks to the children of Israel.
Deuteronomy 1:3
And it came to pass in the fortieth year, in the eleventh month, on the first day of the month, that Moses spake (דבר dabar) unto the children of Israel, according unto all that YHWH had given him in commandment unto them;
An Oath of Sevens
In verse 8, just five verses after Moses begins to speak the “words” (dabar) of Yahweh to Israel, he provides them with the legal basis for their claim to the Promised Land. This legal claim, according to the text, originates when Yahweh sware (an oath) with Abraham which was confirmed with Isaac and Jacob.
Deuteronomy 1:8
8 Behold, I have set the land before you: go in and possess the land which YHWH sware [נשבע=shaba] unto your fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, to give unto them and to their seed after them.
In Hebrew, the word shaba (sware) implies the making of an oath (shabuw’ah). As we’ll see in the text below, this oath originated in Genesis 22 when Abraham showed exceptional faith by his willingness to sacrifice his son Isaac as Yahweh instructed.
That act, taken in faith, believing that whatever the outcome, he and Isaac would return down off that mountain, was the catalyst for Yahweh’s unilateral declaration – His “shaba” with Abraham. This swearing (shaba) of an oath (shabuw’ah) in Genesis 22 was the first oath Yahweh sware with any man in the Bible. Take special note of Genesis 26:2-4 below, as it confirms that this shaba (swearing) with Abraham was in fact a shabuw’ah (oath).
Genesis 22:12-18
12 And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me. 13 And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold behind him a ram caught in a thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in the stead of his son. 14 And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh: as it is said to this day, In the mount of YHWH it shall be seen.
15 And the angel of YHWH called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time, 16 And said, By myself have I sworn [shaba’], saith YHWH, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son: 17 That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;
18And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice.
Genesis 26:2-4
2 And YHWH appeared unto him [Isaac], and said, Go not down into Egypt; dwell in the land which I shall tell thee of: 3 Sojourn in this land, and I will be with thee, and will bless thee; for unto thee, and unto thy seed, I will give all these countries, and I will perform the oath [shabuw’ah] which I sware [shaba] unto Abraham thy father;
4 And I will make thy seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and will give unto thy seed all these countries; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed;
Daniel 9 and Yahweh’s Oath with Abraham
This first oath in the Bible sworn unilaterally by Yahweh with Abraham was so important that not only did Moses use it in the opening verses of Deuteronomy as the legal basis for Israel’s claims to the Promised Land, but the prophet Daniel referenced it in his own opening words in the 9th chapter of the book that bears his name. In Daniel chapter 9 verse 4, Daniel opens his “prayers and supplications” to Yahweh by quoting Moses in Deuteronomy 7. This passage referenecs the “covenant and mercy to them that love him, and to them that keep his commandments”.
Daniel 9:4
4 And I prayed unto YHWH my God, and made my confession, and said, O Lord, the great and dreadful God, keeping the covenant and mercy to them that love him, and to them that keep his commandments;
A careful examination of Deuteronomy 7:7-9 & 12 makes it clear that this “covenant and mercy” was the the “shaba” YHWH made with “the fathers”. These “fathers”, Moses goes on to clarify in Deu. 9:5, originated with Abraham. For further confirmation from the book of Deuteronomy see the following references: Deu. 1:8; 6:10; 9:5; 30:20; 34:4.
Deuteronomy 7:7-9, 12
7 YHWH did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people:
8 But because YHWH loved you, and because he would keep the oath [shabuw’ah] which he had sworn [shaba] unto your fathers, hath YHWH brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt…
9 Know therefore that YHWH thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations;…
12 Wherefore it shall come to pass, if ye hearken to these judgments, and keep, and do them, that YHWH thy God shall keep unto thee the covenant and the mercy which he sware [shaba] unto thy fathers:
Genesis 26:2-4
2 And YHWH appeared unto him [Isaac], and said, Go not down into Egypt; dwell in the land which I shall tell thee of: 3 Sojourn in this land, and I will be with thee, and will bless thee; for unto thee, and unto thy seed, I will give all these countries,
and I will perform the oath [shabuw’ah] which I sware [shaba] unto Abraham thy father;
4 And I will make thy seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and will give unto thy seed all these countries; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed;
Deuteronomy 9:5
5 Not for thy righteousness, or for the uprightness of thine heart, dost thou go to possess their land: but for the wickedness of these nations YHWH thy God doth drive them out from before thee, and that he may perform the word [dabar] which YHWH sware [shaba] unto thy fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
As you can see from the passages above, Daniel’s plea to Yahweh for His “covenant and mercy” was a call to remember the oath that Yahweh sware (shaba) with Abraham!
Numerical Considerations
The numerical peculiarities of this form of the word sware (shaba – (נשבע) as found in Deu. 1:8 and 7:8, 12 are worth noting. This word shaba, in context, originates from the events described in Genesis 22 as confirmed in Gen. 26:2-4 and the other references provided. This form of Shaba (swear) is used 22 times in Deuteronomy and another 22 times in the rest of the Old Testament.
A Swearing of Seven
The context is important here and requires a better understanding of the Hebrew root word shaba/sware (שבע). This word is the identical phonetic twin of the word sheba/seven (שבע). In other words, before vowel pointings were added to the Hebrew version of the Biblical text, the Hebrew spelling of both words was the same. From this duel meaning root word we get the Hebrew cognates, השבעה shabuw’ah (oath), שבעים shib’iym (seventy), שבעים shabuwa’ (Sevens). So, in other words, in Hebrew, the idea of swaring and its resulting oath is etymologically, phonetically, numerically, and symbolically related to the number seven and its related numerical derivatives.
This bit of Hebrew semantics allows us to look at the covenant Yahweh made with Abraham in Genesis 22 in a different light. That swearing with Abraham was quite literally an Oath of Sevens. This understanding brings new context to Daniel’s opening words in verse 4 where he calls to remembrance the “covenant and mercy” – that oath of Sevens Yahweh sware with Abraham.
Think about Yahweh’s answer to Daniel. The answer given to Daniel was the prophecy of Shabuwa’ Shib’iym (70 Sevens), a prophecy that was, as we have learned, the etymologic, numeric, and dare I say spiritual offspring of that ancient Oath of Sevens.
Returning to the word shaba as used in Deuteronomy, consider its numerical value. The value of this form of the word is 422. Remember this form of the word is used 22 times in Deuteronomy and 22 times in the rest of the OT. Regarding this word, it is fascinating to note that the Hebrew words for 70 & Seven (Shabuwa’ and Shib’iym) as found in Daniel 9:2, 24, and 25, not only share the same etymological roots as sheba’/shaba’ (seven/swear), but they also have the same numerical value.For those who might not be aware, in Daniel 9:24 the prophecy begins with the words שבעים שבעים (seventy sevens). In English, the words have been translated with two different meanings based upon the vowel pointings given by the Masorets. In Hebrew, the words as given are identical. The context was the original determining factor of their meaning. In the text below please keep in mind that Hebrew is read from right to left while the English version from left to right.
Daniel 9:24
שבעים שבעים נחתך על עמך ועל עירקדש לכלא
Daniel 9:24
Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city,…
With this contextual and numerical understanding of Daniel 9 and its origins in Deuteronomy and Genesis 22 in mind, I’d like to now attempt to explain to you the numerical and compositional genius of Daniel 9 and how Daniel used his divinely inspired skills to present his Jewish brethren with a literary, numerical, symbolic, and prophetic work of art that is unparalleled in recorded history.
Reconstructing Daniel 9
To give you a true sense of the compositional genius of Daniel 9 we need to start at the chronological beginning. When I say chronological beginning, I mean we need to determine the compositional order of the chapter. Thankfully Daniel provides us with that chronological fixing point. Take a look:
Daniel 9:21-23
21 Yea, whiles I was speaking in prayer, even the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision at the beginning, being caused to fly swiftly, touched me about the time of the evening oblation. 22 And he informed me, and talked with me, and said, O Daniel, I am now come forth to give thee skill and understanding. 23 At the beginning of thy supplications the commandment came forth, and I am come to shew thee; for thou art greatly beloved: therefore understand the matter, and consider the vision.
What is helpful about this passage, if taken at face value, is that Daniel received the prophecy of 70 Sevens before he had written down a single word of what we know today as chapter 9. He was still in prayer when the prophecy was given to him. This takes on significant meaning when you realize that Daniel 9:23-27 is a distinct literary unit of 100 words and 418 letters. This is important because this passage of 100 Hebrew words is arranged around the two Hebrew words שבעה ושבעים pronounced sheba’ shabuwa’ (‘7 Sevens’ when read in Hebrew from right to left).
There are 49 words before words שבעה ושבעים and 49 words after, i.e. 49+2+49. Considering the thematic content of Daniel 9:23-27 it takes little imagination to see the intentional nature of such an arrangement.
Further evidence that this passage was an intentional numerical construction is found in the letter count of these 5 verses. There are 204 letters before the 2 words & 10 letters of שבעה ושבעים (7 sevens) and 204 letters after. It is beyond any reasonable doubt that this passage could have been coincidently arranged in this manner. This is further demonstrated when a close examination of the prophecy itself, its solution, the arrangement of the words, verse numbers, and word values are taken into consideration.
Literary and Numerical Construction Techniques of the Hebrew Bible
It has long been known that the authors of the Hebrew Bible constructed many of its passages using chiastic, acrostic, and other literary techniques to emphasize and embellish the text. Only recently though, have scholars been rediscovering that the Hebrew authors arranged certain words, passages, or ideas in a numerically structured manner so that those words, ideas, or themes of the text could be emphasized. Based upon the scribal notes of the Leningrad Codex, the oldest known complete Hebrew text of the Old Testament, the numerical structure of chapters, passages, and words in the Hebrew Bible is testified to as far back as the 1st millennium.
The late professor Casper Labuschange, a pioneeer of Logotechnical analysis of the Hebrew text, explained the purpose of the ancient scribal efforts to count the verses, words, and letters of the Bible:
“The Masoretes and subsequent copiers of the text of the Hebrew Bible, who were responsible for handing down the text, carefully counted verses, words, and even letters of most biblical books and painstakingly located and registered their arithmetic centres. It is usually held that the purpose of this meticulous counting was to ensure that the text was transmitted correctly. However, in my opinion, it had a more specific purpose: namely to preserve the intricate, delicate numerical structures, which can be done only by recounting what has been counted earlier.”
The First 22 Verses
Clearly, Daniel 9:23-27 demonstrates an intentional numerical construction. This construction emphasized the numerical theme of the passage by centering it upon the Hebrew word שבעה ושבעים (7 sevens). This proves beyond a reasonable doubt that this was not an accidental construction.
Since this portion of the text was received before Daniel’s inspired pen composed the rest of the text of Daniel 9, that leads us to consider the possibility that the first 22 verses of Daniel 9 were also a numerical construction used as a literary device to bring special attention to the text.
A preliminary analysis of the text supports this consideration. Daniel 9 (in Hebrew), taken as a whole, is a passage of 462 words. Its verse structure is centered around 18 words of verse 15. There are 222 words before the 18 word numerical center of verse 15 and 222 words after (222 + 18 + 222). This indicates that Daniel purposely composed the first 22 verses of Daniel 9:1-22 so that when the prophecy of 70 Sevens was included in verses 23-27 its verse structure would be evenly balanced around the 18 words of verse 15. This provides compelling evidence that Daniel 9 was a single and cohesive work.
Daniel 9:15
15 And now, O Lord our God, that hast brought thy people forth out of the land of Egypt with a mighty hand, and hast gotten thee renown, as at this day; we have sinned, we have done wickedly.
We already know that Daniel’s opening words in verse 4 are words quoted from Deuteronomy 7 and refer to the Oath of Sevens Yahweh sware with Abraham in Genesis 22. Remember that unilateral swearing by Yahweh with Abarham was, according to numerous references in the book of Deuteronomy, the legal basis for Israel’s claim to the Promised Land. Further a return to the Promised Land, at what Daniel understood to be the end of the prophecied 70 years desolations of Jerusalem (Dan. 9:1-2), was an important underlying theme of Daniel’s prayers and supplications made in the first 22 verses of Daniel 9.
Consider this. In Genesis 22:15 Yahweh swears (shaba) a Oath of Sevens with Abraham. This the text further describes as an irrevocable “blessing” that included (in part) a promise that through Abraham’s “seed” all nations of the earth would be blessed.
The word “bless” in Hebrew is barak. In some cases, this Hebrew word is also translated kneel (bow a knee), and may originate in the sense of kneeling to receive a blessing.
The first occurrence of the root form of barak (bless) is found in Genesis 22:17. This occurrence is right at the heart of the promised blessings made in Yahweh’s Oath of Sevens with Abraham. Blessings that not only included a permanent land grand to the Promised Land, but more importantly those blessings include a promise that through Abraham’s “seed” all nations of the earth would be blessed. Intriguingly, the root form of the word barak (bless) first used in Genesis 22:17 has a numerical value of 222.
So what do you think? Did Daniel just get lucky with a numerical verse structure of 222 + 18 + 222 for chapter 9? Or did Daniel purposely design the first 22 verses of chapter 9 so that when the prophecy of 70 Sevens was included it would highlight the promised blessings of Genesis 22 which he had in mind when he opened his pleadings to Yahweh in Daniel 9:4?
Genesis 22:15-17
5 And the angel of YHWH called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time, 16 And said, By myself have I sworn [shaba], saith YHWH, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son:
17 That in blessing [barak] I will bless [barak = 222] thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;
18And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed [barak]; because thou hast obeyed my voice.
222 / dabar: Before & After
It might also interest you to note, that the Hebrew word value of 222 is found three times in Daniel 9. The first occurrence is found in Daniel 9:12 which is the first half of the 222 words structure (222 + 18 + 222). Here the word is translate “his words” and comes from the Hebrew root word dabar (דבר) which means word, speech, speak, utterance, matter, thing. In Daniel 9:12 the root dabar (דבר) preceeds its suffix (דבריו).
KJV Daniel 9:12 And he hath confirmed his words [דבריו], which he spake [דבר] against us, and against our judges that judged us, by bringing upon us a great evil: for under the whole heaven hath not been done as hath been done upon Jerusalem.
The third occurrence of 222 in Daniel 9 comes 10 verses later in verse 22. Verse 22 falls in the 2nd half of the 222 word structure of Daniel 9 (222 + 18 + 222). Here the word dabar is translated as talked or spoke. This time the root dabar is preceed by (וי) (וידבר). Another way to look at this is that in the first half of Daniel 9 dabar precedes its suffix. In the last half of Daniel 9, dabar follows its prefix.
((דבריו) 222 + 18 + 222 )(וידבר)).
See the chart on the above left for a more visual explanation.
Daniel 9:22
And he informed me, and talked [וידבר] with me, and said, O Daniel, I am now come forth to give thee skill and understanding.
The 2nd occurrence of the 222 word value is found in Daniel 9:13. Here a form of the Hebrew word avon (iniquities) is used. For what is it worth, the only other occurrence of this form of avon is found in Ezra 9:13.
Jacob and 222
I’ve mentioned in past articles that 13 & 14 are often used in the Old and New Testament to represent Yahweh’s redemptive plan through Yeshua (Jesus) the promised “seed”. I believe I’ve also mentioned that the Hebrew word Jacob has a numerical value of 182 or 13×14 and as such, his name appears to have messianic symbolism.
With this in mind, it is worth noting what many consider a messianic prophecy in Numbers 24. Here Baalam prophecies that a star shall come “out of Jacob” and a scepter rise out of Israel. In this passage the 13th Hebrew letter mem precedes the name Jacob. This additional letter gives his name a numerical value of 222.
Numbers 24:17-19
17 I shall see him, but not now: I shall behold him, but not nigh: there shall come a Star out of Jacob [מיעקב = 222], and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel, and shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Sheth. 18 And Edom shall be a possession, Seir also shall be a possession for his enemies; and Israel shall do valiantly. 19 Out of Jacob [מיעקב = 222] shall come he that shall have dominion, and shall destroy him that remaineth of the city.
Isaiah 65:9
9 And I will bring forth a seed out of Jacob [מיעקב = 222], and out of Judah an inheritor of my mountains: and mine elect shall inherit it, and my servants shall dwell there.
Genesis 28:13-16
13 And, behold, YHWH stood above it, and said, I am YHWH God of Abraham thy father, and the God of Isaac: the land whereon thou liest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed; 14 And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed.
15 And, behold, I am with thee, and will keep thee in all places whither thou goest, and will bring thee again into this land; for I will not leave thee, until I have done that which I have spoken to thee of. 16 And Jacob awaked out of his sleep, and he said, Surely YHWH is in this place; and I knew it not.
The Mighty Hand of Yahweh
For the Biblical sleuths out there, can you tell me where the words “mighty hand” (ביד חזקה) are first used in the Bible to describe Yahweh’s deliverance of Israel from Egypt? How about the last occurrence of this phrase?
If you said Exodus 13, you are correct. Moses, when instructing Israel to keep the feast of Unleavened Bread, told them that when their sons asks why they keep the feasts they were to tell them this feast was related to Yahweh’s “mighty hand” that delivered them from Egyptian bondage.
Exodus 13:8-11
8 And thou shalt shew thy son in that day, saying, This is done because of that which YHWH did unto me when I came forth out of Egypt. 9 And it shall be for a sign unto thee upon thine hand, and for a memorial between thine eyes, that YHWH’S law may be in thy mouth: for with a strong hand [ביד חזקה] hath YHWH brought thee out of Egypt.
10 Thou shalt therefore keep this ordinance in his season from year to year. 11 And it shall be when YHWH shall bring thee into the land of the Canaanites, as he sware [נשבע=shaba] unto thee and to thy fathers, and shall give it thee,…
Before continuing with this theme of the “mighty hand” of Yahweh, its worth noting here that Exodus 13:10 connects Israel’s return to the Promised Land with an oath the Yahweh “sware unto thee and to thy fathers”. Once you’ve noticed the significance of Yahweh’s swearing (shaba) with the fathers (beginning with Abraham) you’ll begin to see it mentioned throughout the OT.
Let’s drill down on the Hebrew phrase ביד חזקה (mighty hand) of Yahweh. Anyone care to guess which book of the Bible most often uses this phrase to describe the Exodus events? If you answered, The Book of Words or Deuteronomy, then you are correct. In fact, this phrase is used five times to describe Yahweh’s deliverance of Israel from Egypt. Here take a look:
In the following passage, the“mighty hand” of Yahweh is used in connection with the fourth commandment.
Deuteronomy 5:15
And remember that thou wast a servant in the land of Egypt, and that YHWH thy God brought thee out thence through a mighty hand [ביד חזקה] and by a stretched out arm: therefore YHWH thy God commanded thee to keep the sabbath day.
Here it is used in connection with reminding your son about the Exodus.
Deuteronomy 6:21
Then thou shalt say unto thy son, We were Pharaoh’s bondmen in Egypt; and YHWH brought us out of Egypt with a mighty hand [ביד חזקה] :
Here it is used in connection with Israel’s cries of affliction and Yahweh’s answer to their prayers.
Deuteronomy 26:7-8
7 And when we cried unto YHWH God of our fathers, YHWH heard our voice, and looked on our affliction, and our labour, and our oppression: 8 And YHWH brought us forth out of Egypt with a mighty hand [ביד חזקה] , and with an outstretched arm, and with great terribleness, and with signs, and with wonders:
Here it is in connection with Moses’ pleadings with Yahweh not to destroy Israel and to remember His servants, “Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob”.
Deuteronomy 9:26-29
26 I prayed therefore unto YHWH, and said, O Lord YHWH, destroy not thy people and thine inheritance, which thou hast redeemed through thy greatness, which thou hast brought forth out of Egypt with a mighty hand [ביד חזקה] . 27Remember thy servants, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; look not unto the stubbornness of this people, nor to their wickedness, nor to their sin:
28 Lest the land whence thou broughtest us out say, Because YHWH was not able to bring them into the land which he promised them, and because he hated them, he hath brought them out to slay them in the wilderness. 29 Yet they are thy people and thine inheritance, which thou broughtest out by thy mighty power and by thy stretched out arm.
Finally, here the phrase is used in connection with Moses explaining to Israel the real reasons that Yahweh delivered Israel from Egypt. Further, this is the very passage that Daniel refers to in verse 4 of Chapter 9 in his opening plea for Yahweh to restore His people to the Promised Land.
Deuteronomy 7:7-9
7YHWH did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people: 8 But because YHWH loved you, and because he would keep the oath [shabuw’ah] which he had sworn [shaba’] unto your fathers, hath YHWH brought you out with a mighty hand [ביד חזקה] , and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.
9 Know therefore that YHWH thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations;
A variation on the “mighty hand” of Yahweh is used an additional 5 times in the book of Deuteronomy.
If you look at every instance of this theme in the book of Deuteronomy you get the sense that the “mighty hand” of Yahweh was employed on behand of Israel when they cried out to Him, when others pleaded on their behalf, when Yahweh was keeping His word or oath to others, and when He worked His sovereign will.
In consideration of how important this theme is to the book of Deuteronomy, the Oath of Sevens, and Israel’s return to the Promised Land, it is rather significant that the final occurrence of the “mighty hand” of Yahweh is found in Daniel 9:15, right in the numerical center of a passage pleading for Israel’s return. These pleadings are followed with a Divine prophetic answer we know as the prophecy of 70 Sevens. Daniel makes the “mighty hand” of Yahweh and the deliverance it provides, the numerical focal point of Chapter 9. Daniel further juxtaposes this deliverance with an unqualified admission of their collective guilt before Him.
Daniel 9:15
And now, O Lord our God, that hast brought thy people forth out of the land of Egypt with a mighty hand [ביד חזקה] , and hast gotten thee renown, as at this day; we have sinned, we have done wickedly.
The Sevens of Daniel 9
Acknowledging the fact that Daniel 9 and the prophecy of 70 Sevens is a prophecy in answer to Daniel’s prayers and supplication concerning the “covenant and mercy” of Yahweh – that ancient Oath of Sevens given by Yahweh to Abraham, it should not come as a surprise that the number 7 might also be an important numerical feature of the 22 verses Daniel composed to highlight this important prophecy. A composition, I might add, that I believe accurately reflected his inspired thoughts, prayers, & supplications up to the point when he received the 70 Sevens prophecy.
If we take the 100 words of the prophecy of 70 Sevens found in verses 23-27 and the 18 words of verse 15 at the numerical center of Daniel 9, we are then left with just 21 verses in chapter 9. These 21 verses include the 7 verses of Daniel 9:16-22 and the 14 verses of Daniel 9:1-14. Structurally, this means we can ascertain three 7 verse groups remaining in Daniel 9. These 7 verse contain 344 words. (Interestingly 344 is 7x7x7 + 1)
They can be arranged as indicated in the chart on the left. Here is why I believe this also was an intentional arrangement.
The Numerical Value of Yahweh’s Name
A careful exploration of the numerical compositional features of the Hebrew text of the Bible reveals that great emphasis was often put on the numerical value (or a factor of said value) of Yahweh’s proper name. In Hebrew each letter has a numerical value. Using the most common method of calculating the proper name of Yahweh’s gives a value of 26. Because 26 has as its factors 2 & 13, the number 13 (the 6th prime) or multiple of 13 is often used to represent Yahweh’s name in the text. Interestingly, Lord (Adoni) and God (Elohyim), additional titles often used to represent Yahweh in the Hebrew text, also are multiples of 13.
Another, though less widely known, way of calculating the numerical value of Yaweh’s name was to use only whole numbers which gave a value of 17 (the 7th prime number).
Numerically Woven into the Text
The numerical value of Yahweh’s name was showcased in the Hebrew text in several ways. One of the most common was to place the name at strategic locations in the text based upon the word or letter count of the verse. Another way was to arranged the structure of the passage to equal a multiple of the value of the name. In this way Yahweh’s power or presence could be represented in the text bringing additional underlying authority to the text. In some cases, it may have been used simply as an artistic embellishment. In either case, numerically weaving the name of Yahweh into the text was another way to honor the holy name of Yahweh. In the 9th chapter of Daniel both compositional techniques described above are used.
Did you know that in the book of Daniel the proper name of Yahweh is only found in chapter 9? It is used 8 times. Of those 8 occurrences, all of them are found in one of the 7 verse groupings. The first occurrence of Yahweh’s name is the 13th word of verse 2.
Note:(13 is a prime factor of the value of Yahweh’s name which is equal to 26 or 13×2)
The last occurrence of Yahweh’s proper name is the 13th word of verse 20. The 4th occurrence of Yahweh’s name is the 130th word of Daniel 9. The 6th and 7th occurrence are the 206th & 213th words of chapter 9.
For those interested, the root form of the Hebrew word “dabar” (word) is used 4 times in Daniel 9. It’s numerical value is 206. The first occurrence is found in verse 2 along with the first occurrence of Yahweh’s name. In this verse it references the “word of YHWH” concerning the 70 years spoken of by Jeremiah. Take a look:
Daniel 9:2
In the first year of his reign I Daniel understood by books the number of the years, whereof the word of YHWH came to Jeremiah the prophet, that he would accomplish seventy [shabuw’ah = 422] years in the desolations of Jerusalem.
Finally, running through the 13th and 14th verses of chapter 9 is a unique 15-word pattern where Yahweh’s name is used three times separated by 6 words each time for: Yahweh + 6 + Yahweh + 6 + Yahweh. Here Yahweh’s name is every 7th word and there are 13 words between the first and last occurrence of His name in this pattern. In chapter 9 Yahweh is refered to by the titles Lord, and God 24 times. The occurrences are as follows:
- 10 – Lord / Adonay
- 1 – God / El
- 13 – God / Elohiym
- 8 – Yahweh
The Numerical Centers of the Sevens
The numerical genius of the first 22 verses of Daniel 9 shines through in another intriguing way. It has to do with the numerical structure of the 7 verse groupings. By the structure of verses 23-27 (49+2+49) and the overall structure of chapter 9 (222+18+222), it is apparent that Daniel understood the finer points of organizing Hebrew passages into equal halves around a numerical center in order to draw the readers attention to specific themes in the text. Daniel uses this numerical structuring technique when writing the 7 verse groups as well.
The 1st Group of Seven
The first 7 verses of Daniel 9 are 109 words. The meaningful numerical center of this passage is the 13 words that begin Daniel’s prayer and supplications to Yahweh. These are the first words spoken by Daniel in chapter 9. There are 48 words before these 13 words and 48 words after (48 + 13 + 48).
Please forgive me but this bears repeating. The 13 word numerical center of the first 7 verses of Daniel 9, refers by way of Deuteronomy 7, to Yahweh’s Oath of Sevens made with Abraham in Genesis 22. How is that for divinely inspiration numerical genius!
Daniel 9:4
“… and said, O Lord, the great and dreadful God, keeping the covenant and mercy to them that love him, and to them that keep his commandments;”
Deuteronomy 7:7-9, 12
7 YHWH did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people:
8 But because YHWH loved you, and because he would keep the oath [shabuw’ah]which he had sworn [shaba] unto your fathers, hath YHWH brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt…
9 Know therefore that YHWH thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepethcovenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandmentsto a thousand generations;
12 Wherefore it shall come to pass, if ye hearken to these judgments, and keep, and do them, that YHWH thy God shall keep unto thee the covenant and the mercy which he sware [shaba] unto thy fathers:
Genesis 22:15-17
15 And the angel of YHWH called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time, 16 And said, By myself have I sworn [shaba], saith YHWH, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son:
17 That in blessing [barak] I will bless [barak= 222] thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;
18And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed [barak]; because thou hast obeyed my voice.
1 Chronicles 16:15-18
15 Be ye mindful always of his covenant; the word [dabar] which he commanded to a thousand generations; 16Even of the covenant which he made with Abraham, and of his oath [shabuwa’] unto Isaac; 17 And hath confirmed the same to Jacob for a law, and to Israel for an everlasting covenant, 18 Saying, Unto thee will I give the land of Canaan, the lot of your inheritance;
The 2nd Group of Seven
The seven verses of Daniel 9:8-14 build upon Daniel’s admission of their collective guilt as a people. There are 113 words in these seven verses. 50 words before the 13 words of its numerical center and 50 after (50 + 13 + 50). The passage climaxes with the acknowledgment that they deserve the curse written by Moses. In the following passage the 13 word numerical center is bracketed in arrows:
Daniel 9:11-13
11 Yea, all Israel have transgressed thy law, even by departing, that they might not obey thy voice; therefore the curse is poured upon us, and the oath that is written in the law of Moses the servant of God,..
>>>because we have sinned against him. 12 And he hath confirmed his words, which he spake against us, and against our judges that judged us, …<<<
by bringing upon us a great evil: for under the whole heaven hath not been done as hath been done upon Jerusalem. 13 As it is written in the law of Moses, all this evil is come upon us: yet made we not our prayer before YHWH our God, that we might turn from our iniquities, and understand thy truth.
To get the fullest sense of what Daniel is saying in the passage above it is helpful to read all seven verses. Once you’ve done that take a look at the following passage where you get a sense that Daniel is again drawing from the words of Moses in Deuteronomy when talking about the curse upon Israel, if they do not obey Yahweh’s laws.
Did you know that Jewish tradition believed that Moses received the law on the 50th day after the exodus? Indeed a case can be made from the Hebrew chronology of the Old Testament that this is the case. Interesting that this group of seven verses highlights the “law of Moses” and its numerical structure of 50 +13 + 50 seems to support this association.
This is especially relevant given Deuteronomy 30:1-5 where it says if Israel returns unto Yahweh (and His laws) He will lift the curse and bring them back to the Promised Land from wherever they are scattered in the world. Again, a return to the Promised Land is an underlying theme of Daniel 9:1-22 and Daniel pleading for this return is best seen within the context of Deuteronomy and the promised blessings of Genesis 22.
Deuteronomy 11:26-28
26 Behold, I set before you this day a blessing and a curse; 27 A blessing, if ye obey the commandments of YHWH your God, which I command you this day: 28 And a curse, if ye will not obey the commandments of YHWH your God, but turn aside out of the way which I command you this day, to go after other gods, which ye have not known.
Deuteronomy 30:1-5
And it shall come to pass, when all these things are come upon thee, the blessing and the curse, which I have set before thee, and thou shalt call them to mind among all the nations, whither YHWH thy God hath driven thee, 2 And shalt return unto YHWH thy God, and shalt obey his voice according to all that I command thee this day, thou and thy children, with all thine heart, and with all thy soul; 3 That then YHWH thy God will turn thy captivity, and have compassion upon thee, and will return and gather thee from all the nations, whither YHWH thy God hath scattered thee.
4 If any of thine be driven out unto the outmost parts of heaven, from thence will YHWH thy God gather thee, and from thence will he fetch thee: 5 And YHWH thy God will bring thee into the land which thy fathers possessed, and thou shalt possess it; and he will do thee good, and multiply thee above thy fathers.
The 3ndGroup of Seven
The final group of seven verses in Daniel 9:16-22 is 122 words and reaches a broken climactic conclusion with the admission of Israel’s collective guilt and a thrice-repeated plea for Yahweh to act. The meaningful numerical center of this passage is 26 words. There are 48 words before this numerical center and 48 after (48 + 26 + 48).
That Daniel purposely chose this number to highlight the personal name of Yahweh and its value of 26, is indicated by the reference to “thy name” which bookends the 26 word numerical center of this passage. Here is the passage with the numerical center bracketed in arrows. Note that just as the numerical center of the first 7 verses of Daniel 9 began Daniel’s plea to Yahweh, the numerical center of this final group of 7 verses appropriately ends Daniel’s words in Chapter 9. Take a look:
Daniel 9:18-19
18 O my God, incline thine ear, and hear; open thine eyes, and behold our desolations, and the city which is called by thy name:
>>>…for we do not present our supplications before thee for our righteousnesses, but for thy great mercies. 19 O Lord, hear; O Lord, forgive; O Lord, hearken and do; defer not, for thine own sake, O my God: for thy city and thy people are called by thy name.<<<
70 Sevens and the Blessing of the Oath of Sevens
How do I summarize something as important and beautiful as the 9th chapter of Daniel? I, frankly, feel inadequate to walk on such holy ground. But if I tried to make this subject as simple as possible I would hope this is not too far from the mark.
Daniel 9 is a prayer by a man of faith, to his faithful Creator. It is a prayer of a contrite sinner to a just and righteous God. It is the prayer, a pleading on behalf of himself and his people for Yahweh to remember an unbreakable oath sworn with their father Abraham. A Oath of Sevens and its blessings, that by way of Deuteronomy and the words of Moses, Daniel painfully explains to his readers why they as a people are totally unworthy to receive.
Nevertheless, by faith in the irrevocable word (dabar) of Yahweh, Daniel pleads for mercy, and for the “mighty hand” of Yahweh to act on their behalf. Just a Yahweh delivered Israel from the hand of Pharaoh, Daniel now pleads for Israel’s deliverance from the 70 years of Babylonian captivity prophesied by Yahweh through Jeremiah.
And once again Yahweh, in response to a man of faith, sets His mighty hand in motion. In answer to Daniel’s prayer regarding the Oath of Seven’s and the related blessings (barak) promised to Abraham, Yahweh sends though the angel Gabriel a prophecy of 70 Sevens. A prophecy that tells when a promised “anointed prince” would “finish the transgression, make an end of sins, to make reconciliation for iniquity, bring in everlasting righteousness, seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most holy”.
Daniel after receiving this gift of assurance in Israel’s coming redemption and restoration goes on to write this prophecy down in a manner which ensured that his readers would someday understand the significance of these important prophetic words. By framing the entire chapter 9 as 222 + 18 + 222 words including the 100 words verses 23-27, Daniel ensured that his readers would someday understand that the 22 verses that introduce the prophecy of 70 Sevens, were, by way of Deuteronomy 7, an acknowledgment that their return to the Promised Land would only be accomplished by the righteousness of Yahweh in keeping the Oath of Sevens that He sware with Abraham in Genesis 22. An oath that promised in part, that through Abraham’s “seed” all nations of the world would be blessed (barak = 222).
Maybe in the most inadequate and abbreviated way, one might say that Daniel 9 was Daniel’s inspired testimony to his brethern that the promised blessings (barak = 222) of Genesis 22:17-18 would be realized by the “mighty hand” of Yahweh and the redemptive work of His “anointed prince” described in the prophecy of 70 Sevens.
In closing I leave you with the words of Peter, Zacharias (father of John), and the apostle Paul, which confirm that Yeshua of Nazareth was the “anointed prince” of the 70 Sevens – that promised “seed” of Abraham through whom all nations of the earth would be blessed (barak):
Acts 3:25-26
25 Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed. 26 Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless [barak = 222] you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.
Luke 1:67-75
67 And his father Zacharias was filled with the Holy Ghost, and prophesied, saying, 68 Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people, 69 And hath raised up an horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David; 70 As he spake by the mouth of his holy prophets, which have been since the world began: 71 That we should be saved from our enemies, and from the hand of all that hate us; 72 To perform the mercy promised to our fathers, and to remember his holy covenant; 73 The oath [shabuw’ah’] which he sware [shaba’] to our father Abraham, 74 That he would grant unto us, that we being delivered out of the hand of our enemies might serve him without fear, 75 In holiness and righteousness before him, all the days of our life.
Galatians 3:16-19
16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. 18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise. 19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
Daniel 9: A Word, Decree, or Commandment?
How many of you can tell me what this verse means?
Jeremiah 29:10
For thus saith YHWH, That after seventy years be accomplished at Babylon I will visit you, and perform my good word toward you, in causing you to return to this place.
Before discussing the meaning of this verse, a bit of context is important. This verse is part of a letter the prophet Jeremiah sent from Jerusalem to the Jewish captives in Babylon. In the letter he tells them to get use to their new home because they will be there for another 70 years. Jeremiah also told them that they were not to lose hope, because after this 70 years captivity YHWH would cause them to return to Jerusalem.
Notice in this passage a couple of key words. In the verse Yahweh promises that He was going to perform his good “word” towards the Jewish captives by causing them to “return” to Jerusalem. The Hebrew for “word” in this passage is dabar. According to my concordance dabar is used 1439 times in the Old Testament. As exemplified in this passage, of the 1439 times the word is used in the Bible, the majority refer to the word, speech, or utterance of Yahweh, the living God of the Bible.
Jeremiah 29:10
For thus saith YHWH, That after seventy years be accomplished at Babylon I will visit you, and perform my good word [dabar] toward you, in causing you to return [shuwb] to this place.
Now let’s look at the word “return” in the passage above. This word “return” is the Hebrew shuwb and it is used over 1000 times in the Scripture. The majority of the time the word is translated return… again, turn…back, etc. The word is most often used in the sense of turning back or returning to something, somewhere, or someone.
As we can see here in Jeremiah 29:10 Yahweh gave His “word” – His dabar that He would cause the Jewish people to “return” – to shuwb to Jerusalem. 70 years later Yahweh’s word was confirmed in 2 Chron. 36:22-23 with the following record:
2 Chronicles 36:22-23
22 Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word [dabar] of YHWH spoken by the mouth of Jeremiah might be accomplished, YHWH stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, that he made a proclamation [abar] throughout all his kingdom, and put it also in writing, saying,
23 Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, All the kingdoms of the earth hath YHWH God of heaven given me; and he hath charged me to build him an house in Jerusalem, which is in Judah. Who is there among you of all his people? YHWH his God be with him, and let him go up.
It’s important to note in this passage that Cyrus’ “proclamation” (abar) was given because Yahweh stirred up the spirit of Cyrus to confirm His (Yahweh’s) “word” (dabar) that the Jewish people would return (shuwb) to Jerusalem after 70 years. As we explore this a bit deeper just remember that Yahweh gave the “word” (dabar) and Cyrus confirmed that word by issuing a proclamation or decree (abar).
Daniel 9 and the Word to Return and Build
You are probably wondering what this has to do with Daniel 9. Let me show you. Based upon what we’ve learned about the dabar (word) of Yahweh which promised that the Jewish people would shuwb (return) to Jerusalem after 70 years, let’s now apply that understanding to Daniel 9:25. Here is the first part of that verse from the KJV as most of you are probably familiar with it:
Daniel 9:25
25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks,….
Now take a look at the same verse with me pointing out the words dabar and shuwb as they appear in the Hebrew text of Daniel 9:25a:
Daniel 9:25
25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the dabar [word] to shuwb [return] and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks,….
Kind of changes how you understand the verse, doesn’t it? If we used our opening verse of this article in Jeremiah 29:10 as a model for understanding Daniel 9:25, then it makes more contextual sense to see the start of the 70 Sevens prophecy begining with a “word” (dabar) of Yahweh that tells the Jewish people to “return” (shuwb) and build Jerusalem.
You’d think, in light of the context of how dabar and shuwb is used in the Hebrew Bible, that at the very least, those who teach on the subject would mention that Daniel 9:25 and the terminus a quo (starting point) of the 70 Seven might refer to the word of the Yahweh. Unfortunately, that has not been the case.
Why are the vast majority of today’s scholars and teachers blind to the possibility that Daniel 9, arguably the most important prophecy in the Bible, begins with the word of Yahweh? Why won’t they at least offer the “word” of Yahweh as one of the options for the fulfillment of Daniel 9:25? I can’t answer that question. It makes absolutely not sense to me.
To drive home the contextual necessity of seeing the “dabar” of Daniel 9:25 as the dabar (word) of Yahweh, take note of the following. In Daniel 9, dabar is used three other times. Each of those occurrences refer to the “dabar” (word) of Yahweh. Here, take a look:
Daniel 9:2
In the first year of his reign I Daniel understood by books the number of the years, whereof the word [dabar] of YHWH came to Jeremiah the prophet, that he would accomplish seventy years in the desolations of Jerusalem.
Daniel 9:12
And he hath confirmed his words [dabar], which he spake against us, and against our judges that judged us, by bringing upon us a great evil: for under the whole heaven hath not been done as hath been done upon Jerusalem.
Daniel 9:23
At the beginning of thy supplications the commandment [dabar] came forth, and I am come to shew thee; for thou art greatly beloved: therefore understand the matter, and consider the vision.
Daniel 9:25
Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment [dabar] to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.
With this contextual light shining on Daniel 9 and its “word to restore and build Jerusalem”, can you explain to me why the authors in the articles below do not even mention the possibility that the very God they exalt and serve is not one of the candidates for giving the word to restore and build Jerusalem – a word that begins a countdown to the fulfillment of the most important messianic prophecy in the Bible?
Even if you didn’t have a clue how the 70 Sevens were meant to be fulfilled, the most plain sense reading of the verse requires us to at least look for a “word” of Yahweh that commanded the Jewish to return and build Jerusalem.
To give you a sense of the disconnect, here are four of my peers who are highly respected for their views on Bible prophecy. As you read through these quotes, try to find any mention that the “word” of Yahweh commanding the Jewish people to “return” and build, might be one of the options worth considering when interpreting the dabar (word) of Daniel 9:25 and its countdown to the Messiah.
David Reagan
The crucial question relates to when the decree was issued “to restore and rebuild Jerusalem.” There are three possible dates:
-
- 538 B.C. — Cyrus, King of Persia, issued a decree to Zerubbabel to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem (2 Chronicles 36:22-23; Ezra 1:1-3; and Ezra 6:1-5).
- 457 B.C. — Artaxerxes, King of Persia, issued a decree to Ezra authorizing him to reinstitute the Temple services, appoint judges and magistrates, and teach the Law (Ezra 7:11-26).
- 445 B.C. — Artaxerxes issued a decree to Nehemiah to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem (Nehemiah 2:1-8). (David Reagan, Daniel’s 70 Weeks of Years – – For the full context of this quote please see the following Link)
Thomas Ice
There are at least three different decrees that are considered in an attempt to “know and discern” the beginning of the seventy weeks of Daniel.
First, there was the decree of Cyrus (Ezra 1:2-4; 6:3-5), issued in 537 B.C., which I will call decree one. Second, the decree of Artaxerxes (Ezra 7:11-26) given in 458 B.C., (decree two). Third, a second decree from Artaxerxes (Neh. 2:5-8, 17, 18) given in 444 B.C., at the time of Nehemiah’s return to Jerusalem, (decree three). I want to note at the outset of the examination of these possibilities that the third decree is the only one that literally fits the exact words of Daniel 9:25, as we shall see….
Artaxerxes’ Decree
It is clear to me that of all the options available, the only decree that specifically fits the statements of Daniel 9:25 is the one by Artaxerxes given in 444 B.C. as recorded in Nehemiah 2:1-8. Why? Because decree one and two relate to rebuilding the Temple. Only decree three speaks specifically of Jerusalem. It is clear that Nehemiah received a decree to “rebuild and restore Jerusalem” from King Artaxerxes. (Thomas Ice – The Seventy Weeks of Daniel – – For the full context of this quote please see the following Link)
Joel Richardson
X. WHAT DECREE? (DAN. 9:25)
25 “So you are to know and discern that from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah the Prince there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks; it will be built again, with plaza and moat, even in times of distress.
-
- The only position that literally fulfills the requirements of the passage seems to be the decree from Artaxerxes as recorded in Nehemiah 2:1-8,17-18 given on March 5, 444 B.C.
- 483 sabbatical years (the first 69 weeks) were fulfilled to the day on March 30, A.D. 33, the date of Christ’s triumphal entry into Jerusalem. (This is 476 years according to the Julian Calendar). Jesus was crucified four days later on April 3, A.D. 33.
- Various “decrees” that have been set forth as the terminus a quo:
- Only one decree matches or fulfills the Scriptural criterion of a decree issued specifically to rebuild the city. (Joel Richardson, Daniel’s 70 Weeks: An Introduction – – For the full context of this quote please see the following Link)
Mark Hitchcock
When the clock starts ticking
-
- The divine prophetic clock for the seventy weeks or 490-year period began ticking on March 5, 444 BC, when the Persian king Artaxerxes issued a decree allowing the Jews to return to rebuild Jerusalem (Nehemiah 2: 1-8). (Hitchcock, Mark. The End: A Complete Overview of Bible Prophecy and the End of Days (p. 68). Tyndale House Publishers. Kindle Edition.)
Ignoring the Context
Let me illustrate how difficult it is to come up with a reasonable interpretation of Scripture when you ignore the context as has been done by the authors above. Each one of the authors above claims that the decree of Artaxerxes Longimanus in 444-445 BC as described in Nehemiah 1-8, 17-18 was the “decree” of Daniel 9:25, a so called “decree” which you now understand is really a dabar (word). I want to reiterate here that I believe each of these authors are well-meaning, sincere, and intelligent brothers in Christ. Yet by ignoring the context of Daniel 9:25 and the “word” to restore and build, they must stretch the credibility of their argument to come up with their terminus a quo (starting point) in 444-445 BC. Here, take a look at the passage, they claim is the “decree” to return and build Jerusalem. As you read this, see if you can ascertain this “decree” and the exact date it was given:
Nehemiah 2:1 – 20
And it came to pass in the month Nisan, in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes the king,…
4 Then the king said unto me, For what dost thou make request? So I prayed to the God of heaven. 5 And I said unto the king, If it please the king, and if thy servant have found favour in thy sight, that thou wouldest send me unto Judah, unto the city of my fathers’ sepulchres, that I may build it. 6 And the king said unto me, (the queen also sitting by him,) For how long shall thy journey be? and when wilt thou return [shuwb]? So it pleased the king to send me; and I set him a time.
7 Moreover I said unto the king, If it please the king, let letters be given me to the governors beyond the river, that they may convey me over till I come into Judah; 8 And a letter unto Asaph the keeper of the king’s forest, that he may give me timber to make beams for the gates of the palace which appertained to the house, and for the wall of the city, and for the house that I shall enter into. And the king granted me, according to the good hand of my God upon me. 9 Then I came to the governors beyond the river, and gave them the king’s letters….
7 Then said I unto them, Ye see the distress that we are in, how Jerusalem lieth waste, and the gates thereof are burned with fire: come, and let us build up the wall of Jerusalem, that we be no more a reproach. 18 Then I told them of the hand of my God which was good upon me; as also the king’s words [dabar] that he had spoken unto me. And they said, Let us rise up and build. So they strengthened their hands for this good work.
20 Then answered I them, and said unto them, The God of heaven, he will prosper us; therefore we his servants will arise and build: but ye have no portion, nor right, nor memorial, in Jerusalem.
Notice in the passage above that exact day when Nehemiah and Artaxerxes talked is not given in the text. It only states that Nehemiah went before Artaxerxes in the 1st month of his 20th year. Nor does the passage above tell use when Artaxerxes gave Nehemiah the letters which granted him the authority to building the walls and gates of Jerusalem. The fact of the matter is that there is no specific word, decree, or commandment given here in Nehemiah 2 that allows us to begin the 70 Sevens countdown without making several assumptions that we cannot prove. Do you really believe that Yahweh, the living God of the Bible gave a countdown to the coming of His Anointed Prince but instead of giving us an exact starting point left it up to us to guess?
We are not just talking some ambiguous prophecy here. We are talking about the definitive proof of Old Testament prophecy, the central thrust upon which the entire history of the Bible pivots, and the best Yahweh could give us was a text that we had to make several critical assumptions about?
Say it isn’t so!
And if that is not enough to stretch the credibility of their interpretations, in order to make the math work, from the reign of Artaxerxes Longimanus in 444-445 BC to the birth of Christ, they then have to use a so called “prophetic year”, which as I’ll try to explain in my next article, has as much basis in Biblical fact and calendric science as those who use the Bible to claim the earth is flat.
Returning to Nehemiah 2, those who’ve read the passage above carefully, I did highlight the Hebrew words shuwb and dabar in the text. Some who read this passage out of desperation might claim the usage of these words fulfills the criteria of Daniel 9:25. This is not the case for several reasons.
-
- First all, the usage of return (shuwb) in verse 6 refers to the king Artaxerxes questioning Nehemiah as to when he will return to Shushan and his service to the king. This is not a statement of when Nehemiah will return to Jerusalem and rebuild its walls.
- Second, the usage of dabar in verse 18 refers to the spoken conversation between Nehemiah and king Artaxerxes and does not specifically tell us what the conversation was about.
- Third, Nehemiah does not provide a specific date for his conversation with Artaxerxes.
Again, even in the most desperate attempt to fit this to the criteria of Daniel 9:25 we must assume several critical pieces of information that the text does not provide us.
A House of Cards
For those who still insist that the Nehemiah’s conversation with Artaxerxes and the letters he was given constitute the “word to return and build Jerusalem” of Daniel 9:25 you still must overcome the chronological impossibility of the position. Here are several real contextual facts that make it impossible to prove Artaxerxes Longimanus and Nehemiah (using and reasonable rending of the facts) were contemporaries.
-
- During the reign of Artaxerxes Longimanus, the palace at Shushan was destroyed by fire.
- Ezra, whose father died in the 19th year of Nebuchadnezzar would have been a minimum of 140+ years old by the reign of Artaxerxes Longimanus. By no reasonable interpretation of the text could he have performed the activities attributed to him in these passages.
- The books of Nehemiah and Ezra show that the priest and Levites who came up with Joshua and Zerubabel in the 1st year of Cyrus (536 BC) were the literal fathers of the priests and Levites who served during the reign of the unnamed Biblical “Artaxerxes” of Nehemiah. In others words, the sons of the priests and Levites who came up under the decree of Cyrus in 536 BC, still served during the reign of “Artaxerxes” of Nehemiah. These priests and Levites were 1st and 2nd generations, not the multi-generational span required by the Artaxerxes Longimanus assumption given by the authors above.
- Mordecai’s presence in both the Biblical and historical record helps date the chronology of Ezra and Nehemiah and thus confirms that the “Artaxerxes” of Ezra 6 & 7 and book of Nehemiah is the Persian king Darius I (the great) son of Hystaspes. The chronological fact related to his service also help explain the identity of the “queen” mentioned in Nehemiah 2:6.
- Ezra 4, 6, & 7 provide compelling evidence to show that the events of Nehemiah and Ezra (Ezra 6 onwards) take place during the reign of Darius ‘the Great’ whom the Bible also identifies as “Artaxerxes”.
For those of you who take your Berean duty seriously, here are several articles that more fully explore the chronology of the 2nd temple era. These articles were part of a response I wrote to an Associate for Biblical Research article by Rick Lanser which was critical of my work on the 2nd temple era chronology related to the Artaxerxes Assumption made by the authors above and most of their peers. They might help you better understand the challenges of assuming the “Artaxerxes” of Nehemiah and Ezra was the Persian king Longimanus.
Introduction – The Associates for Biblical Research Responds to the Artaxerxes Assumption
Part I – Cyrus to Darius: The 2nd Temple Context of Ezra 4
Part II – Darius & Artaxerxes: The Context of the Word to Restore & Build Jerusalem
Part III – Darius the great Persian Artaxerxes: A Contextual Look at the Book of Ezra in the Light of Persian History
Part IV – Darius and the Kingdom of Arta
Part V – Darius, Artaxerxes, & the Bible: Confirming Royal Persian Titulature
Part VI – Mordecai & the Chronological Context of Esther
Part VII – Esther, Ahasuerus, & Artaxerxes: Who was the Persian King of 127 Provinces?
Part VIII – Darius I: A Gentile King at the Crux of Jewish Messianic History
Part IX – The Priests & Levites of Nehemiah 10 & 12: Exploring the Papponymy Assumption
The Word to Return and Build Jerusalem
So, if Artaxerxes didn’t or couldn’t have give the “word to return and build Jerusalem” as described in Daniel 9:25, who gave this word to return and build and what was it?
As I’ll show you there is only one “word” (dabar) to “return” (shuwb) and build that truly fits the contextual requirements of Daniel 9:25. That “word” was given by Yahweh, the living God of the Bible. Fittingly, not only was this word given by our Creator, He made sure it was witnessed not by one, but two prophetic voices in the Biblical record. Further, those voices were confirmed by the witness of Ezra 6.
I opened this article with a quote from Jeremiah 29:10 in order to help you understand the meaning of the Hebrew word dabar and shuwb.
Jeremiah 29:10
For thus saith YHWH, That after seventy years be accomplished at Babylon I will visit you, and perform my good word [dabar] toward you, in causing you to return [shuwb] to this place.
I also used this verse to help you understand that every aspect of Daniel 9 and its related chronology should be seen through a Yahweh centric lens. It was Yahweh’s dabar (word) which was the catalyst that stirred Cyrus to make a decree that allowed the Jewish people to return to Jerusalem and build the city and temple.
There is little question that Yahweh’s “word” began this process. How many of you can tell me though what happened after Cyrus’ decree that allowed the Jewish people to return and build the city of Jerusalem and the temple? Based upon the Biblical record, basically nothing happened for the next 16 years.
Did you know that Joshua the chief priest, Zerubbabel the governor, and the people only got some of the foundation stones laid on the temple before their construction efforts on Yahweh’s house ceased. For those 16 years they were still building Jerusalem, only their priorities had shifted from Yahweh’s house to their own houses, and other construction effort in the city.
Then something happened in the 2nd year of Darius ‘the Great’ that completely changed the dynamics of the 2nd temple era. Yahweh, through the prophets Haggai and Zechariah gave them a “word” which commanded the Jewish people to – return – and build His house, the very beating heart of the city of Jerusalem which they had been neglecting.
As you read the Biblical passages below keep in mind as I demonstrated in my last article Daniel 9: Building Jerusalem the Bible is clear that building the temple (Yahweh’s house) was in fact “building” the city of Jerusalem. Those who claim that building the temple was not building the city of Jerusalem are making a spurious argument that they – have not – and cannot prove with any reasonable rendering of the Biblical record.
Here are the dabar (words) of Yahweh to return and build Jerusalem:
Haggai 1:1-15
In the second year of Darius the king, in the sixth month, in the first day of the month, came the word [dabar] of YHWH by Haggai the prophet unto Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, governor of Judah, and to Joshua the son of Josedech, the high priest, saying, 2 Thus speaketh YHWH of hosts, saying, This people say, The time is not come, the time that the YHWH’S house should be built…
3 Then came the word of YHWH by Haggai the prophet, saying, 4 Is it time for you, O ye, to dwell in your cieled houses, and this house lie waste? 5 Now therefore thus saith YHWH of hosts; Consider your ways…
Thus saith YHWH of hosts; Consider your ways. 8 Go up to the mountain, and bring wood, and build the house; and I will take pleasure in it, and I will be glorified, saith YHWH.
9 Ye looked for much, and, lo, it came to little; and when ye brought it home, I did blow upon it. Why? saith YHWH of hosts. Because of mine house that is waste, and ye run every man unto his own house. …
12 Then Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and Joshua the son of Josedech, the high priest, with all the remnant of the people, obeyed the voice of YHWH their God, and the words of Haggai the prophet, as YHWH their God had sent him, and the people did fear before YHWH. 13 Then spake Haggai YHWH’S messenger in YHWH’S message unto the people, saying, I am with you, saith YHWH.
14 And YHWH stirred up the spirit of Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, governor of Judah, and the spirit of Joshua the son of Josedech, the high priest, and the spirit of all the remnant of the people; and they came and did work in the house of YHWH of hosts, their God, 15 In the four and twentieth day of the sixth month, in the second year of Darius the king.
In the passage above we find the word of Yahweh telling the Jewish people to return, turn back and build His house. Here is the same “word” witnessed by the prophet Zechariah:
Zechariah 1:1-17
In the eighth month, in the second year of Darius, came the word [dabar] of YHWH unto Zechariah, the son of Berechiah, the son of Iddo the prophet, saying, 2 YHWH hath been sore displeased with your fathers. 3 Therefore say thou unto them, Thus saith YHWH of hosts; Turn [shuwb] ye unto me, saith YHWH of hosts, and I will turn [shuwb] unto you,…
12 Then the angel of YHWH answered and said, O YHWH of hosts, how long wilt thou not have mercy on Jerusalem and on the cities of Judah, against which thou hast had indignation these threescore and ten years?
16 Therefore thus saith YHWH; I am returned [shuwb] to Jerusalem with mercies: my house shall be built in it, saith YHWH of hosts, and a line shall be stretched forth upon Jerusalem.
17 Cry yet, saying, Thus saith YHWH of hosts; My cities through prosperity shall yet be spread abroad; and YHWH shall yet comfort Zion, and shall yet choose Jerusalem.
In this passage we have the word of YHWH telling Zechariah that His house would be built and the construction “line shall be stretched forth upon Jerusalem.” Notice in this passage this “word” of Yahweh came at the end of His 70 years of divine indignation. In other words, up to this point, (including the decree of Cyrus), the Jewish people were still under a divine cloud of Yahweh’s anger. That is why (in part) the construction efforts of the Jewish people could not get any traction during the 16 years following the decree of Cyrus in 536 BC. It was only after this divine indignation was lifted, Yahweh had returned to Jerusalem “with mercies”, and commandment the Jewish people to return (shuwb) and build His house that those efforts shifted into high gear. Four yeas later in the 6th year of Darius (516 BC) the temple was completed.
For those who might be wondering it was no accident that Yahweh waited until the 2nd year of Darius to lift his 70 years of Divine anger. The related Biblical chronolgy proves this. As I’ve shown in my book The Jubilee Code: Prophetic Milestones in Yahweh’s Redemptive Plan, (free book download here) the 2nd year of Darius (Hystaspes) marked an important pivot point in the Yahweh’s redemptive plan for mankind. 520 BC was the end of the 71st and the beginning of the 72nd jubilee cycle from Adam. This date also marked the end of the 2nd of three separate 70 year periods of time which all had their origins in the 70th Jubilee.
In other words, you could see this chronology as represented in the Biblical record as 70 jubilee cycles from Adam, then 70 years of Divine anger, at the end of which began Yahweh’s word (dabar) was given that started the 70 Seven’s countdown to the Messiah Yeshua. (70 Jubilees > 70 years > 70 Sevens = Messiah)
And to wrap this all up with the contextual finality that demands we pay attention; we have a third witness in Ezra 6 to the “word” of Yahweh as given through the prophets Haggai and Zechariah. For those of you who must have a “commandment” note in this passage that the “word” of Yahweh through Haggai and Zechariah is described a commandment (ta’am).
Ezra 6:14-15
4 And the elders of the Jews builded, and they prospered through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo. And they builded, and finished it, according to the commandment [ta’am] of the God of Israel, and according to the commandment of Cyrus, and Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia. 15 And this house was finished on the third day of the month Adar, which was in the sixth year of the reign of Darius the king.
This passage then confirms that the dabar of Yahweh was not just a “word” but as seen from the witness of Ezra, this word was also considered a ta’am which is translated in the Bible as a decree or commandment.
Yahweh’s Word begins the Countdown
As you consider the implications of the information, I’ve shared in this article I hope it will challenge you to give Yahweh, the living God of the Bible, the credit He deserves for His part in the Bible’s most important prophecy.
I think it is worth remembering that Revelation 19:10 reminds us that the “spirit of prophecy” is the testimony of Yeshua – that is – Yahweh’s Salvation (Yeshua means Yahweh’s Salvation). Daniel 9 is the Bible’s most detailed testimony of Yahweh’s Salvation, as such why would we expect its countdown (terminus a quo) to begin with anything less than the very word of Him who gave us the prophecy.
Maranatha!
Next Time
Yahweh willing, next time in Daniel 9: What Time is It? we’ll explore how the prophecy of 70 Sevens keeps time. Does Daniel 9 give a specific measure of time to be used in calculating its “sevens”? What about those who claim Gen. 29:27-28 uses the term shabuwa’ to refer to a period of seven years, thus the “sevens” of Daniel 9 should also be understood as periods of 7 years? Or how about a so called “prophetic year” of 360 days? Was there really ever such a year in Biblical history? I hope you’ll join me next time as we put to rest some of these myths about Biblical “time”.
Rebooting a Christian Conspiracy Theory
Every generation has a responsibility to push back against prejudice and ignorance in whichever form it rears its ugly head. This is especially true for those of us who hold to a Biblical world view and call ourselves followers of Christ (Christians). Today I want to push back against a conspiracy theory that seems to be couched in Biblical scholarship but in reality is based upon assumption and error.
What I’m talking about is the disparagement which claims that certain Jewish Rabbis maliciously manipulated the Hebrew Masoretic (MT) text of the Bible to undermine early Christian faith in Yeshua (Jesus) as the Bible’s promised Messiah. The flip side of this theory states that because of these manipulations of the Hebrew text, the Greek Septuagint (LXX) text of the Bible is a more dependable text and should be restored as the primary translation of the Old Testament.
LXX & MT Background (an overly simplified explanation)
For those who are not familiar with the background of the LXX and MT, in short today nearly every translation of the Old Testament (OT) comes from one of these two older translations of the Old Testament. The LXX is a translation of the OT in Greek made by 70 seventy translators beginning in the 3rd century BC from an older Hebrew version of the OT. There is evidence that the LXX or a similar version was quoted from in the New Testament.
The MT is a Hebrew version of the OT copied and edited by Jewish Mesoretes (7th-10th centuries) from an older Hebrew version. The oldest extant copies of the MT text date to roughly the 9th century AD. Today the MT test is the basis for most Bible translations used today.
These two version of the Old Testament differ in certain passages and these differences have been a source of contention amongst Biblical scholars for centuries if not millenniums.
Rebooting a Conspiracy
So let’s look closer at why some scholars believe the MT text of the Old Testament was changed by the Jewish Rabbis after the time of Christ. The manipulation, so the conspiracy theory goes, was undertaken by the Jewish Rabbis beginning nearly 1900 years ago and accomplished in at least two ways:
The first manipulation (the conspiracy theorists claim) was accomplished by the Jewish Rabbis changing the original Hebrew chronology of the Old Testament so as to make it seem that Yeshua (Jesus) did not arrive at the time the Messiah was expected to appear.
The Second manipulation (the conspiracy theorists claim) was accomplished by Jewish Rabbis changing certain Hebrew words in the Messianic passages of the OT used by early Christians to prove that Yeshua was the Messiah. This purposeful change of the Hebrew text (by the Rabbis) was in order to undermine the Messianic nature of those passages and again undermine Christian claims that Yeshua was the Bible’s prophesied messiah.
As we dig into this subject you need to understand why this is so important. Today anti-Semitism is once again raging across our world and the adversary hasn’t changed his methods. Did you know that Nazi Germany’s anti Semitism was born out of a racist form of evolutionary Darwinism that believed the Jewish people were an inferior (less evolved) race than the Aryan race and it was for the good of mankind that they were being exterminated? This “scientific” racism was then supplemented by the still earlier seeds of anti-Semitism sown by Martin Luther and other religious leaders centuries before and then used by Hitler and the Nazi’s a further justification for the extermination of the Jewish people. The result of which we now call the Holocaust.
What many Christians are ignorant of, is that while Martin Luther contributed greatly to the Protestant Reformation, he was a conflicted man and later in life it is evident that he developed a great animosity towards the Jewish people. So much so that he wrote a diatribe against the Jews entitled: The Jews and their Lies. This evil rant by Luther was in fact used centuries later by the Nazi’s as part of the justification for their treatment of the Jews. Here are few of the actions that Luther advised the German Christians to take against the Jewish people of his day: (you can read Luther’s entire vile rant here)
-
-
- Christians should “set fire to their synagogues or schools and bury and cover with whatever will not burn”
- That Jewish houses should be “razed and destroyed”
- That their “Talmudic writings… be taken from them”
- “Their rabbis be forbidden to teach henceforth on pain of loss of life and limb.”
- “safe conduct on the highways be abolished completely for the Jews”
- “…that usury be prohibited to them, and that all cash and treasure of silver and gold be taken from them and put aside for safekeeping…”
- Such a procedure must also be followed in this instance. Burn down their synagogues, forbid all that I enumerated earlier, force them to work, and deal harshly with them, as Moses did in the wilderness, slaying three thousand lest the whole people perish.
-
Honestly, Luther’s words are hard to distinguish from those of Hitler’s and his murderous henchmen. The point of bringing up Luther’s horrific statements above, is that words and the ideas they engender have consequences, even if those sentiments lie dormant for a very long time. Even if you one tries to claim Luther’s words were given in a moment of person weakness and frustration, nevertheless those seeds of malice lay dormant just waiting for the right growing environment. That season came years later in Nazi Germany.
Reseeding the Garden of Prejudice
I believe that claiming the Jewish Rabbis of past centuries manipulated the Hebrew Bible to undermine Christian faith in Yeshua the Messiah is an evil seed that should not be nurtured in the garden of Christian thought. While such a conspiracy theory may not be rooted in any real anti-Semitism by the Christian scholars who propose it today, if left unchallenged such seeds are sure to find fertile grounds, if not in the anti-Semitic passions of our generation, surely in that of one to come.
God forbid we as Christians (by commission or omission) provide any assistance to those who would persecute Yahweh’s chosen people. As a final thought, before doing my best to refute the rabbinic forgeries conspiracy theory, let me remind you what Yahweh has in store for the Jewish people who He considers “the apple of his eye”. These prophecies of Zechariah are just two of many examples found in the Old Testament.
Zechariah 2:8-13
8 For thus saith YHWH of hosts; After the glory hath he sent me unto the nations which spoiled you: for he that toucheth you toucheth the apple of his eye. 9 For, behold, I will shake mine hand upon them, and they shall be a spoil to their servants: and ye shall know that YHWH of hosts hath sent me.
10 Sing and rejoice, O daughter of Zion: for, lo, I come, and I will dwell in the midst of thee, saith YHWH. 11 And many nations shall be joined to YHWH in that day, and shall be my people: and I will dwell in the midst of thee, and thou shalt know that YHWH of hosts hath sent me unto thee. 12 And YHWH shall inherit Judah his portion in the holy land, and shall choose Jerusalem again. 13 Be silent, O all flesh, before YHWH: for he is raised up out of his holy habitation.
Zechariah 8:22-23
Yea, many people and strong nations shall come to seek YHWH of hosts in Jerusalem, and to pray before YHWH. 23 Thus saith YHWH of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you.
Refuting a Christian Conspiracy Theory
“The astonishing story of a 1900-year-old rabbinical conspiracy to corrupt the Bible’s ancient history and thwart belief in Jesus as the Messiah.”
These are the words boldly proclaimed on the cover of Douglas Woodward’s book Rebooting the Bible. In this article and any following articles I’ll be challenging several foundational claims Mr. Woodward makes in his rabbinic conspiracy theory, a theory I might add that is shared by other respected Bible scholars and historian from the past and present.
At the outset I want to make clear that I do not believe Mr. Woodward is a racist. I’ve read and reviewed several of his books over the years and from what I can determine he is a smart and talented author who in my opinion in this instance has gone far afield of sound and reasonable scholarship. I’d encourage each of you to read the fuller context of the quotes I’ll be taking from Mr. Woodward’s book so you can make your own determination about the validity of his claims and my challenges to those claims. His book can be found on Amazon here: Rebooting the Bible
LXX verse MT
To start of with I’d like to address one of the foundational claims made by Mr. Woodward relating the superiority of the Septuagint (LXX) verses the Masoretic (MT) text of the Scripture. Mr. Woodward believes the Septuagint is superior because the Masoretes forged certain passages of the Old Testament in order to obfuscate the identity of Yeshua (Jesus) as the Messiah. I quote Mr. Woodward:
“…the argument this book puts forth is that the King James Version was created using the Masoretic Text (MT), and therefore, was corrupted long before today. It happened nineteen centuries ago. This corruption was intentional. It was carried out by those rabbis who survived the destruction of Herod’s Temple.” (Woodward, S. Douglas, Rebooting the Bible – Preface xii)
“To peek behind the curtains (and to peak your interest), here’s this story in a nutshell: Second-century rabbis deliberately altered the biblical text 1,900 years ago to twist what the original authors wrote.” (Woodward, S. Douglas, Rebooting the Bible – introduction p.11)
Beginning with discussions on Genesis 5 and 11, scholarship reveals what must have been the second-century rabbis’ corrupting principle. If so, it confirms the thesis of this book. And it demonstrates that if they were willing to change the Bible and history in one area, they were equaling willing to change it in another.” (Woodward, S. Douglas, Rebooting the Bible – Chapter 5 Correcting Chronology: The Genesis Timeline Recovered, pp. 217-218, emphasis by Mr. Woodward)
“So why should Christians care? Akiba’s position of authority and interpretive method became the bais for his altering Scripture. You see, if the Bible’s wording didn’t suit Akiba, he (and his disciples) would merely change it to what would. And , as we will document, these unwanted (and unwarranted) changes eventually found their way into the Protestant Bible’s Old Testament.” (Woodward, S. Douglas, Rebooting the Bible – Chapter 2 – Rabbi Akiba & the Bar Kokhba Revolt, p. 90)
“Conclusion
If we seek the most accurate Old Testament available today, the verdict must be the Alexandrian (OG) Septuagint. It was the Church’s Bible for hundreds of years, it has the best textual support, and it offers splendid backing from the affirmation that Jesus Christ is the Messiah. Additionally, it was the intent of Rabbi Akiba ben Josef and the Mamnia Academy to muddle the biblical testimony that God Himself would come In the flesh as our Redeemer. Thus, the most essential attribute of the Messiah was rejected by Rabbinical Judaism – that the Messiah was not just “anointed” – He was a member of the Godhead.” ((Woodward, S. Douglas, Rebooting the Bible – Chapter 2, Rabbi Akiba & the Bar Kokhba Revolt, p. 111, emphasis by Mr. Woodward)
One of the most troubling aspects of Mr. Woodward’s accusations found in the quotes above is that in over 400 pages of arguments and documentation in his book he cannot provide a single verifiable instance where it can be proven that Rabbi Akiba or any other Jewish Rabbi purposely altered the MT text of the Bible to undermine Christian belief in Yeshua as the Bible’s promised redeemer. To the casual reader the quotes above by Mr Woodward appear to be concrete statements of fact. Unfortunately, if you read closely you’ll also find these claims are qualified in other parts of the book with the admission “it appears” and “it is suspected”. Here are a couple of examples:
Suspected but not Proven
The Evolution of the Protestant Bible
At this point, we need to pause and recap how the Protestant Bible was married to the Masoretic Text, while the LXX was “left at the altar.” Given the suspected perfidiousness of the rabbis altering the text, it seems the Septuagint would be preferred.” (Woodward, S. Douglas, Rebooting the Bible –Correcting Chronology: The Genesis Timeline Recovered, p. 202)
“Chapter Three
The Battle for the Septuagint
Inspecting the Scene of the Crime
AS SHOULD BE APPARENT TO THE READER BY THIS POINT, THERE ARE MANY REASONS TO SUSPECT THAT THE TEXT PROTESTANTS AFFIRM AS THE AUTHORITATIVE STANDARD was intentionally corrupted by rabbinical academies in the early second century. In contrast, the Septuagint, whose Pentateuch translation was completed in the middle of the third century B.C. I Alexandria, Egypt, has escaped this textual sabotage.” (Woodward, S. Douglas, Rebooting the Bible – Chapter 3, The Battle for the Septuagint, p. 113, emphasis by Mr. Woodward)
“Finally, as illustrated in the preceding chapter in considerable detail, there are numerous Jewish scholars and textual experts who confirm that the rabbinic school had “method, means, and opportunity” to alter the text”. (Woodward, S. Douglas, Rebooting the Bible – Chapter 3, The Battle for the Septuagint, p. 117)
Underline emphasis added by WS
“Method, Means, and Opportunity”
I don’t know about you, but I’d hate to be judged about something solely upon circumstantial evidence that indicated I had “method, means, and opportunity” to commit a crime. What’s even worse, we are making (unproven) accusations about Jewish Rabbis who can no longer speak in their own defense. The unsettling truth of the matter is, that Mr. Woodward and those who share the Rabbinic forgeries conspiracy theory cannot provid any solid evidence to back up their conspiracy theory, it’s simply conjecture. It is beyond my comprehension why Mr. Woodward or any Christian, would claim 2nd century Jewish Rabbi’s were guilty of an egregious crime without anything more than circumstantial evidence. Sure the textual differences of the MT & LXX are important subjects to be discussed, but libelous accusations about the source of those differences, based upon nothing more than “motive, means, and opportunity”, in my opinion, are not a sound foundation for any serious discussion of the Bible.
Proof of Manipulation
As quoted above Mr. Woodward believes that the LXX is a more trustworthy translation of the Old Testament because he suspects “perfidiousness of the rabbis altering the text” of the MT. As I’ve said, there are some differences between the LXX and the MT, but by Mr. Woodward’s own admission the unintended consequences of these differences did not amount to much until about 200 years ago. I’ll dig into Mr. Woodward’s reasoning for this later because it is importing to the thesis of his book. The bottom line though is the textual differences between the LXX and the MT do not materially impede the overall Messianic redemptive message of either text. No matter which Bible version you read, the message of Yahweh’s Salvation (His Yeshua) is there for any reader to find.
As a layman I can’t give you fancy textual arguments to show you why the Septuagint is not a superior text. It is my opinion that the MT is a more accurate version of the original Hebrew text because despite what the Jewish Rabbis of the 2nd temple era are accused of, we know for a fact that the 70 translators of the Septuagint did in fact change the original Hebrew text in order to make their version more understandable and appealing to the Greek speaking audience of their day. Kind of like a “living Bible” of there day instead of a literal translation. Here are some real examples of Greek words used to replace the original Hebrew:
-
- When translating the original Hebrew words that described the body of water the Israelites crossed when leaving Egypt, the Septuagint authors used the Greek term Erythraean Sea (Red Sea) instead of the Hebrew Yam Suph (Sea of Reeds).
- In Exodus 30:13 the Hebrew Bible describes two weights of measure: the shekel and gerah. The Septuagint changes these weights into the Greek measures of didrachm and oboli. Didrachm is also substituted for shekel in other verses as well. (These Greek measures were not invented until centuries after the book of Exodus was recorded.)
- In Genesis 46:34 the MT gives the location as Goshen. The LXX changes the text to read Gesem of Arabia.
- In Gen. 46:28 the MT tells us that Jacob sent Judah to Joseph in Goshen. The LXX has it as Heroes (Heroopolis) in the land of Ramessses.
- To my mind the example that convinces me that the authors of the Septuagint were comfortable modifying the original Hebrew text to appeal to their Greek audience is their abuse of the most important name in the Bible.
You see the translators of the Septuagint took the proper name of Yahweh and over 6500 times replaced it with the impersonal Greek title Theos which could be applied to any god of the Greek pantheon.
It is an obvious double standard to accuse (with only circumstantial evidence) the Jewish Rabbis of the 2nd century AD of maliciously corrupting the Hebrew MT because it is believed they had the “motive, means, and ” to modify the original Hebrew text to fit their anti-Christian agenda, yet many of these accusers ignore the patently obvious changes to the text by the authors of the Septuagint. To give you a sense of just how extensive the modification made by the authors of the Septuagint, here is nearly every instance where the personal name of Yahweh was removed from the Septuagint text and replaced with the impersonal title used by the Greeks to identify any “god”.
Genesis
2:4f, 7ff, 15f, 18f, 21f; 3:1, 8f, 13f, 21ff; 4:1, 3f, 6, 9, 13, 15f, 26; 5:29; 6:3, 6ff; 7:1, 5, 16; 8:20f; 9:26; 10:9; 11:5f, 8f; 12:1, 4, 7f, 17; 13:4, 10, 13f, 18; 14:22; 15:1f, 4, 6ff, 18; 16:2, 5, 7, 9ff, 13; 17:1; 18:1, 3, 12ff, 17, 19f, 22, 26f, 30ff; 19:2, 13f, 16, 18, 24, 27; 20:4, 18; 21:1, 33; 22:11, 14ff; 23:6, 11, 15; 24:1, 3, 7, 12, 18, 21, 26f, 31, 35, 40, 42, 44, 48, 50ff, 56; 25:21ff; 26:2, 12, 22, 24f, 28f; 27:7, 20, 27, 29, 37; 28:13, 16, 21; 29:31ff, 35; 30:24, 27, 30; 31:3, 35, 49; 32:4f, 9, 18; 33:8, 13ff; 38:7, 10; 39:2f, 5, 16, 21, 23; 40:1, 7; 42:10, 30, 33; 44:5, 7ff, 16, 18ff, 22, 24, 33; 45:8f; 47:18, 25; 49:18;
Exodus
3:2, 4, 7, 15f, 18; 4:1f, 4ff, 10f, 13f, 19, 21f, 24, 27f, 30f; 5:1ff, 17, 21f; 6:1f, 6ff, 10, 12f, 26, 28ff; 7:1, 5f, 8, 10, 13f, 16f, 19f, 22, 25; 8:1, 5, 8, 10, 12f, 15f, 19f, 22, 24, 26ff; 9:1, 3ff, 8, 12f, 20ff, 27ff, 33, 35; 10:1ff, 7ff, 16ff, 24ff; 11:1, 3f, 7, 9f; 12:1, 11f, 14, 23, 25, 27ff, 31, 36, 41ff, 48, 50f; 13:1, 3, 5f, 8f, 11f, 14ff, 21; 14:1, 4, 8, 10, 13ff, 18, 21, 24ff, 30f; 15:1ff, 6, 11, 16ff, 21, 25f; 16:3f, 6ff, 15f, 23, 25, 28f, 32ff; 17:1f, 4f, 7, 14, 16; 18:1, 8ff; 19:3, 7ff, 18, 20ff; 20:2, 5, 7, 10ff, 22; 22:11, 20; 23:17, 19, 25; 24:1ff, 7f, 12, 16f; 25:1; 27:21; 28:12, 29f, 35f, 38; 29:11, 18, 23ff, 28, 41f, 46; 30:8, 10ff, 20, 22, 34, 37; 31:1, 12f, 15, 17; 32:5, 7, 9, 11, 14, 22, 26f, 29ff, 33, 35; 33:1, 5, 7, 9, 11f, 17, 19, 21; 34:1, 4ff, 9f, 14, 23f, 26ff, 32, 34; 35:1f, 4f, 10, 21f, 24, 29f; 36:1f, 5; 38:22; 39:1, 5, 7, 21, 26, 29ff, 42f; 40:1, 16, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 32, 34f, 38;
Leviticus
1:1ff, 5, 9, 11, 13f, 17; 2:1ff, 8ff, 14, 16; 3:1, 3, 5ff, 9, 11f, 14, 16; 4:1ff, 6f, 13, 15, 17f, 22, 24, 27, 31, 35; 5:6f, 12, 14f, 17, 19; 6:1f, 6ff, 14f, 18ff, 24f; 7:5, 11, 14, 20ff, 25, 28ff, 35f, 38; 8:1, 4f, 9, 13, 17, 21, 26ff, 34ff; 9:2, 4ff, 10, 21, 23f; 10:1ff, 6ff, 11ff, 15, 17, 19; 11:1, 44f; 12:1, 7; 13:1; 14:1, 11f, 16, 18, 23f, 27, 29, 31, 33; 15:1, 14f, 30; 16:1f, 7ff, 12f, 18, 30, 34; 17:1f, 4ff, 9; 18:1f, 4ff, 21, 30; 19:1ff, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21f, 24f, 28, 30ff, 34, 36f; 20:1, 7f, 24, 26; 21:1, 6, 8, 12, 15f, 21, 23; 22:1ff, 8f, 15ff, 21f, 24, 26f, 29ff; 23:1ff, 8f, 11ff, 16ff, 20, 22f, 25ff, 33f, 36ff, 43f; 24:1, 3f, 6ff, 11ff, 16, 22f; 25:1f, 4, 17, 38, 55; 26:1f, 13, 44ff; 27:1f, 9, 11, 14, 16, 21ff, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34;
Numbers
1:1, 19, 48, 54; 2:1, 33f; 3:1, 4f, 11, 13f, 16, 39ff, 44f, 51; 4:1, 17, 21, 37, 41, 45, 49; 5:1, 4ff, 8, 11, 16, 18, 21, 25, 30; 6:1f, 5f, 8, 12, 14, 16f, 20ff, 24ff; 7:3f, 11; 8:1, 3ff, 10ff, 20ff; 9:1, 5, 7ff, 13f, 18ff, 23; 10:1, 9f, 13, 29, 32ff; 11:1ff, 10f, 16, 18, 20, 23ff, 28f, 31, 33; 12:2, 4ff, 8f, 11, 13f; 13:1, 3; 14:3, 8ff, 13f, 16ff, 20f, 26, 28, 35, 37, 40ff; 15:1, 3f, 7f, 10, 13ff, 17, 19, 21ff, 28, 30f, 35ff, 39, 41; 16:3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15ff, 19f, 23, 28ff, 35f, 38, 40ff, 44, 46; 17:1, 7, 9ff, 13; 18:1, 6, 8, 12f, 15, 17, 19f, 24ff, 28f; 19:1f, 13, 20; 20:3f, 6f, 9, 12f, 16, 23, 27; 21:2f, 6ff, 14, 16, 28, 34; 22:8, 13, 18f, 22ff, 31f, 34f; 23:3, 5, 8, 12, 15ff, 21, 26; 24:1, 6, 11, 13; 25:3f, 10, 16; 26:1, 4, 9, 52, 61, 65; 27:3, 5f, 11f, 15ff, 21ff; 28:1, 3, 6ff, 11, 13, 15f, 19, 24, 26f; 29:2, 6, 8, 12f, 36, 39f; 30:1ff, 5, 8, 12, 16; 31:1, 3, 7, 16, 21, 25, 28ff, 37ff, 47, 50, 52, 54; 32:4, 7, 9f, 12ff, 20ff, 25, 27, 29, 31f; 33:2, 4, 38, 50; 34:1, 13, 16, 29; 35:1, 9, 34; 36:2, 5f, 10, 13;
Deuteronomy
1:3, 6, 8, 10f, 19ff, 25ff, 30ff, 34, 36f, 41ff, 45; 2:1f, 7, 9, 12, 14f, 17, 21, 29ff, 33, 36f; 3:2f, 18, 20ff, 26; 4:1ff, 7, 10, 12, 14f, 19ff, 23ff, 27, 29ff, 34f, 39f; 5:2ff, 9, 11f, 14ff, 22, 24f, 27f, 32f; 6:1ff, 10, 12f, 15ff, 24f; 7:1f, 4, 6ff, 12, 15f, 18ff, 25; 8:1ff, 5ff, 10f, 14, 18ff; 9:3ff, 16, 18ff, 22ff, 28; 10:1, 4f, 8ff, 17, 20, 22; 11:1f, 4, 7, 9, 12f, 17, 21ff, 25, 27ff, 31; 12:1, 4f, 7, 9ff, 14f, 18, 20f, 25ff, 31; 13:3ff, 10, 12, 16ff; 14:1f, 21, 23ff, 29; 15:2, 4ff, 9f, 14f, 18ff; 16:1f, 5ff, 10f, 15ff, 20ff; 17:1f, 8, 10, 12, 14ff, 19; 18:1f, 5ff, 9, 12ff, 21f; 19:1ff, 8ff, 14, 17; 20:1, 4, 13f, 16ff; 21:1, 5, 8ff, 23; 22:5; 23:1ff, 5, 8, 14, 18, 20f, 23; 24:4, 9, 13, 15, 18f; 25:15f, 19; 26:1ff, 7f, 10f, 13f, 16ff; 27:2f, 5ff, 9f, 15; 28:1f, 7ff, 15, 20ff, 24f, 27f, 35ff, 45, 47ff, 52f, 58f, 61ff, 68; 29:1f, 4, 6, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20ff, 27ff; 30:1ff, 16, 20; 31:2ff, 11ff, 25ff, 29; 32:3, 6, 9, 12, 19, 27, 30, 36, 48; 33:2, 7, 11ff, 21, 23, 29; 34:1, 4f, 9ff;
Joshua
1:1, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17; 2:9ff, 14, 24; 3:3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17; 4:1, 5, 7f, 10f, 13ff, 18, 23f; 5:1f, 6, 9, 14f; 6:2, 6ff, 11ff, 16f, 19, 24, 26f; 7:1, 6ff, 10, 13ff, 19f, 23, 25f; 8:1, 7f, 18, 27, 30f, 33; 9:9, 14, 18f, 24, 27; 10:8, 10ff, 14, 19, 25, 30, 32, 40, 42; 11:6, 8f, 12, 15, 20, 23; 12:6; 13:1, 3, 8, 14, 33; 14:2, 5ff, 12, 14; 15:13; 17:4, 14; 18:3, 6ff, 10; 19:50f; 20:1; 21:2f, 8, 43ff; 22:2ff, 9, 16ff, 22ff, 27ff, 31, 34; 23:1, 3, 5, 8ff, 13ff; 24:2, 7, 14ff, 26f, 29, 31;
Judges
1:1f, 4, 19, 22; 2:1, 4f, 7f, 10ff, 20, 22f; 3:1, 3f, 7ff, 12, 15, 25, 28; 4:1ff, 6, 9, 14f, 18; 5:2ff, 9, 11, 13, 23, 25, 31; 6:1, 6ff, 10ff, 21ff, 34; 7:2, 4f, 7, 9, 15, 18, 20, 22; 8:7, 19, 23, 34; 10:6f, 10f, 15f; 11:9ff, 21, 23f, 27, 29ff, 35f; 12:3; 13:1, 3, 8, 13, 15ff, 23ff; 14:4, 6, 19; 15:14, 18; 16:5, 8, 18, 20, 23, 27f, 30; 17:2f, 13; 18:6; 19:18, 26f; 20:1, 18, 23, 26ff, 35; 21:3, 5, 7f, 15, 19;
Ruth
1:6, 8f, 13, 17, 21; 2:4, 12f, 20; 3:10, 13; 4:11ff;
1 Samuel
1:3, 5ff, 9ff, 15, 19ff, 26ff; 2:1ff, 6ff, 10ff, 17f, 20f, 24ff, 30; 3:1, 3f, 6ff, 15, 17ff; 4:3ff; 5:3f, 6, 8f, 11; 6:1f, 4, 8, 11f, 14ff; 7:1ff, 12f, 17; 8:6f, 10, 18, 21f; 9:15, 17; 10:1, 6, 17ff, 22, 24f; 11:7, 13, 15; 12:3, 5ff, 22ff; 13:12ff; 14:3, 6, 10, 12, 23, 33ff, 39, 41, 45; 15:1f, 10f, 13, 15ff, 28, 30f, 33, 35; 16:1f, 4ff, 12ff, 16, 18; 17:37, 45ff; 18:12, 14, 17, 28; 19:5f, 9; 20:3, 8, 12ff, 21ff, 42; 21:6f; 22:10, 12, 17, 21; 23:2, 4, 10ff, 18, 21; 24:4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 18f, 21; 25:24ff, 34, 38f, 41; 26:9ff, 15ff, 23f; 28:6, 10, 16ff; 29:2, 6ff; 30:6, 8, 23, 26;
2 Samuel
1:10, 12, 14, 16; 2:1, 5f; 3:9, 18, 21, 28, 39; 4:8f; 5:2f, 10, 12, 19f, 23ff; 6:2, 5, 7ff, 21; 7:1, 3ff, 8, 11, 18ff, 22, 24ff; 8:6, 11, 14; 9:11; 10:3, 12; 11:9, 11, 13, 27; 12:1, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13ff, 20, 24f; 13:32f; 14:9, 11f, 15, 17ff, 22; 15:7f, 15, 21, 25, 31; 16:4, 8ff, 18; 17:14; 18:19, 28, 31f; 19:7, 19ff, 26ff, 30, 35, 37; 20:6, 19; 21:1, 3, 6f, 9; 22:1f, 4, 7, 14, 16, 19, 21f, 25, 29, 31f, 42, 47, 50; 23:2, 10, 12, 16f; 24:1, 3, 10ff, 14ff, 21ff;
1 Kings
1:2, 11, 13, 17f, 20f, 24, 27, 29ff, 33, 36f, 43, 47f; 2:3f, 8, 15, 23f, 26ff, 32f, 38, 42ff; 3:1ff, 5, 7, 10, 15, 17, 26; 5:3ff, 7, 12; 6:1f, 11, 19, 37; 7:12, 40, 45, 48, 51; 8:1, 4, 6, 9ff, 15, 17f, 20ff, 25, 28, 44, 53f, 56f, 59ff; 9:1ff, 8ff, 15, 25; 10:1, 5, 9, 12; 11:2, 4, 6, 9ff, 14, 23, 31; 12:15, 24, 27; 13:1ff, 5f, 9, 17f, 20ff, 26, 32; 14:5, 7, 11, 13ff, 18, 21f, 24, 26, 28; 15:3ff, 11, 14f, 18, 26, 29f, 34; 16:1, 7, 12f, 19, 25f, 30, 33f; 17:1f, 5, 8, 12, 14, 16, 20ff, 24; 18:1, 3f, 7f, 10ff, 18, 21f, 24, 30ff, 36ff, 46; 19:4, 7, 9ff, 14f; 20:4, 9, 13f, 28, 35f, 42; 21:3, 17, 19f, 23, 25f, 28; 22:5ff, 11f, 14ff, 19ff, 28, 38, 43, 52f;
2 Kings
3f, 6, 15ff; 2:1ff, 14, 16, 19, 21, 24; 3:2, 10ff; 4:1, 16, 27f, 30, 33, 43f; 5:1, 3f, 11, 16ff, 20; 6:12, 17f, 20, 26f, 33; 7:1f, 6, 16f, 19; 8:1, 5, 8, 10, 12f, 18f, 27; 9:3, 6f, 11f, 25f, 36; 10:10, 16f, 23, 30ff; 11:3f, 7, 10, 13, 15, 17ff; 12:2, 4, 9ff, 16, 18; 13:2ff, 11, 17, 23; 14:3, 6, 14, 24ff; 15:3, 5, 9, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34f, 37; 16:2f, 8, 14, 18; 17:2, 7ff, 11ff, 23, 25, 28, 32ff, 39, 41; 18:3, 5ff, 12, 15f, 22f, 25, 30, 32, 35; 19:1, 4, 6, 14ff, 19ff, 23, 31ff, 35; 20:1ff, 8f, 11, 16f, 19; 21:2, 4ff, 9f, 12, 16, 20, 22; 22:2ff, 8f, 13, 15f, 18f; 23:2ff, 6f, 9, 11f, 16, 19, 21, 23ff, 32, 37; 24:2ff, 9, 13, 19f; 25:9, 13, 16;
1 Chronicles
2:3; 6:15, 31f; 9:19f, 23; 10:13f; 11:2f, 9f, 14, 18; 12:19, 23; 13:2, 6, 10f, 14; 14:2, 10, 17; 15:2f, 12ff, 25f, 28f; 16:2, 4, 7f, 10f, 14, 23, 25f, 28f, 31, 33f, 36f, 39ff; 17:1, 4, 7, 10, 16f, 19f, 22ff, 26f; 18:6, 11, 13; 19:13; 21:3, 9ff, 22ff, 26ff; 22:1, 5ff, 11ff, 16, 18f; 23:4f, 13, 24f, 28, 30ff; 24:19; 25:3, 6f; 26:12, 22, 27, 30; 27:23; 28:2, 4f, 8ff, 12f, 18ff; 29:1, 5, 8ff, 16, 18, 20ff, 25;
2 Chronicles
1:1, 3, 5f, 9; 2:1, 4, 11f, 14f; 3:1; 4:16; 5:1f, 7, 10, 13f; 6:1, 4, 7f, 10ff, 14, 16f, 19, 41f; 7:1ff, 6f, 10ff, 21f; 8:1, 11f, 16; 9:4, 8, 11; 10:15; 11:2, 4, 14, 16; 12:1f, 5ff, 9, 11ff; 13:5f, 8ff, 14, 18, 20; 14:2, 4, 6f, 11ff; 15:2, 4, 8f, 11ff; 16:2, 7ff, 12; 17:3ff, 9f, 16; 18:4, 6f, 10f, 13, 15f, 18ff, 27, 31; 19:2, 4, 6ff; 20:3ff, 13ff, 17ff, 26ff, 32, 37; 21:6f, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18; 22:4, 7, 9; 23:3, 5f, 12, 14, 16, 18ff; 24:2, 4, 6ff, 12, 14, 18ff, 24; 25:2, 4, 7, 9, 15, 27; 26:4f, 16ff; 27:2f, 6; 28:1, 3, 5f, 9ff, 13, 19, 21f, 24f; 29:2f, 5f, 8, 10f, 15ff, 25, 27, 30ff, 35; 30:1, 5ff, 12, 15, 17ff; 31:2ff, 6, 8, 10f, 14, 16, 20; 32:8, 11, 16f, 21ff, 26; 33:2, 4ff, 9ff, 15ff, 22f; 34:2, 8, 10, 14f, 17, 21, 23f, 26f, 30f, 33; 35:1ff, 6, 12, 16, 26; 36:5, 7, 9f, 12ff, 18, 21ff;
Ezra
1:1ff, 5, 7; 2:68; 3:3, 5f, 8, 10f; 4:1, 3; 6:21f; 7:6, 10f, 27f; 8:25, 28f, 35; 9:5, 8, 15; 10:3, 11;
Nehemiah
1:5, 11; 3:5; 4:14; 5:13; 8:1, 6, 9f, 14; 9:3ff; 10:29, 34f; Job 1:6ff, 12, 21; 2:1ff, 6f; 12:9; 28:28; 38:1; 40:1, 3, 6; 42:1, 7, 9ff;
Psalms
1:2, 6; 2:2, 4, 7, 11; 3:1, 3ff, 7f; 4:3, 5f, 8; 5:1, 3, 6, 8, 12; 6:1ff, 8f; 7:1, 3, 6, 8, 17; 8:1, 9; 9:1, 7, 9ff, 13, 16, 19f; 10:1, 3, 12, 16f; 11:1, 4f, 7; 12:1, 3ff; 13:1, 3, 6; 14:2, 4, 6f; 15:1, 4; 16:2, 5, 7f; 17:1, 13f; 18:1ff, 6, 13, 15, 18, 20f, 24, 28, 30f, 41, 46, 49; 19:7ff, 14; 20:1, 5ff, 9; 21:1, 7, 9, 13; 22:8, 19, 23, 26ff, 30; 23:1, 6; 24:1, 3, 5, 8, 10; 25:1, 4, 6ff, 10ff, 14f; 26:1f, 6, 8, 12; 27:1, 4, 6ff, 10f, 13f; 28:1, 5ff; 29:1ff, 7ff; 30:1ff, 7f, 10, 12; 31:1, 5f, 9, 14, 17, 21, 23f; 32:2, 5, 10f; 33:1f, 4ff, 8, 10ff, 18, 20, 22; 34:1ff, 6ff, 15ff, 22; 35:1, 5f, 9f, 17, 22ff, 27; 36:1, 5f; 37:3ff, 7, 9, 13, 17f, 20, 23f, 28, 33f, 39f; 38:1, 9, 15, 21f; 39:4, 7, 12; 40:1, 3ff, 9, 11, 13, 16f; 41:1ff, 10, 13; 42:8; 44:23; 45:11; 46:7f, 11; 47:2, 5; 48:1, 8; 50:1; 51:15; 54:4, 6; 55:9, 16, 22; 56:10; 57:9; 58:6; 59:3, 5, 8, 11; 62:12; 64:10; 66:18; 68:11, 16ff, 22, 26, 32; 69:6, 13, 16, 31, 33; 70:1, 5; 71:1, 5, 16; 72:18; 73:20, 28; 74:18; 75:8; 76:11; 77:2, 7, 11; 78:4, 21, 65; 79:5, 12; 80:4, 19; 81:10, 15; 83:16; 84:1ff, 8, 11f; 85:1, 7f, 12; 86:1, 3ff, 8f, 11f, 15, 17; 87:2, 6; 88:1, 9, 13f; 89:1, 5f, 8, 15, 18, 46, 49ff; 90:1, 13, 17; 91:2, 9; 92:1, 4f, 8f, 13, 15; 93:1, 3ff; 94:1, 3, 5, 7, 11f, 14, 17f, 22f; 95:1, 3, 6; 96:1f, 4f, 7ff, 13; 97:1, 5, 8ff, 12; 98:1f, 4ff, 9; 99:1f, 5f, 8f; 100:1ff, 5; 101:1, 8; 102:1, 12, 15f, 18f, 21f; 103:1f, 6, 8, 13, 17, 19ff; 104:1, 16, 24, 31, 33ff; 105:1, 3f, 7, 19, 21, 45; 106:1f, 4, 16, 25, 34, 40, 47f; 107:1f, 6, 8, 13, 15, 19, 21, 24, 28, 31, 43; 108:3; 109:14f, 20f, 26f, 30; 110:1f, 4f; 111:1f, 4, 10; 112:1, 7; 113:1ff, 9; 114:7; 115:1, 9ff; 116:1, 4ff, 9, 12ff; 117:1f; 118:1, 4ff, 23ff, 29; 119:1, 12, 31, 33, 41, 52, 55, 57, 64f, 75, 89, 107f, 126, 137, 145, 149, 151, 156, 159, 166, 169, 174; 120:1f; 121:2, 5, 7f; 122:1, 4, 9; 123:2f; 124:1f, 6, 8; 125:1f, 4f; 126:1ff; 127:1, 3; 128:1, 4f; 129:4, 8; 130:1ff, 5ff; 131:1, 3; 132:1f, 5, 8, 11, 13; 133:3; 134:1ff; 135:1ff, 13f, 19ff; 136:1, 3; 137:4, 7; 138:4ff, 8; 139:1, 4, 21; 140:1, 4, 6ff, 12; 141:1, 3, 8; 142:1, 5; 143:1, 7, 9, 11; 144:1, 3, 5, 15; 145:3, 8ff, 14, 17f, 20f; 146:1f, 5, 7ff; 147:1f, 5ff, 11f, 20; 148:1, 5, 7, 13f; 149:1, 4, 9; 150:1, 6;
Proverbs
1:7, 29; 2:5f; 3:5, 7, 9, 11f, 19, 26, 32f; 5:21; 6:16; 8:13, 22, 35; 9:10; 10:3, 22, 27, 29; 11:1, 20; 12:2, 22; 14:2, 26f; 15:3, 8f, 11, 16, 25f, 29, 33; 16:1ff, 9, 11, 20, 33; 17:3, 15; 18:10, 22; 19:3, 14, 17, 21, 23; 20:10, 12, 22ff, 27; 21:1ff, 30f; 22:2, 4, 12, 14, 19, 23; 23:17; 24:18, 21; 25:22; 28:5, 25; 29:13, 25f; 30:9; 31:30;
Isaiah
1:2, 4, 9ff, 18, 20, 24, 28; 2:2f, 5, 10ff, 17, 19, 21; 3:1, 8, 13ff; 4:2, 4f; 5:7, 9, 12, 16, 24f; 6:1, 3, 5, 8, 11f; 7:3, 7, 10ff, 14, 17f, 20; 8:1, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17f; 9:7f, 11, 13f, 17, 19; 10:12, 16, 20, 23f, 26, 33; 11:2f, 9, 11, 15; 12:1f, 4f; 13:4ff, 9, 13; 14:1ff, 5, 22ff, 27, 32; 16:8, 13f; 17:3, 6; 18:4, 7; 19:1, 4, 12, 14, 16ff, 25; 20:2f; 21:6, 8, 10, 16f; 22:5, 12, 14f, 17f, 25; 23:9, 11, 17f; 24:1, 3, 14f, 21, 23; 25:1, 6, 8ff; 26:4, 8, 10ff, 15ff, 21; 27:1, 3, 12f; 28:2, 5, 13f, 16, 21f, 29; 29:6, 10, 13, 15, 19, 22; 30:1, 9, 15, 18, 20, 26f, 29ff; 31:1, 3ff, 9; 32:6; 33:2, 5f, 10, 21f; 34:2, 6, 8, 16; 35:2, 10; 36:7, 10, 15, 18, 20; 37:1, 4, 6, 14ff, 20ff, 24, 32ff, 36; 38:1ff, 7, 11, 14, 16, 20, 22; 39:5f, 8; 40:2f, 5, 7, 10, 13, 27f, 31; 41:4, 13f, 16f, 20f; 42:5f, 8, 10, 12f, 19, 21, 24; 43:1, 3, 10ff, 14ff; 44:2, 5f, 23f; 45:1, 3, 5ff, 11, 13f, 17ff, 21, 24f; 47:4; 48:1f, 14, 16f, 20, 22; 49:1, 4f, 7f, 13f, 18, 22f, 25f; 50:1, 4f, 7, 9f; 51:1, 3, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 20, 22; 52:3ff, 8ff; 53:1, 6, 10; 54:1, 5f, 8, 10, 13, 17; 55:5ff, 13; 56:1, 3f, 6, 8; 57:19; 58:5, 8f, 11, 13f; 59:1, 13, 15, 19ff; 60:1f, 6, 9, 14, 16, 19f, 22; 61:1ff, 6, 8ff; 62:2ff, 6, 8f, 11f; 63:7, 14, 16f; 64:8f, 12; 65:7f, 11, 13, 15, 23, 25; 66:1f, 5f, 9, 12, 14ff, 20ff;
Jeremiah
1:2, 4, 6ff, 11ff, 19; 2:1ff, 8f, 12, 17, 19, 22, 29, 31, 37; 3:1, 6, 10ff, 16f, 20ff, 25; 4:1ff, 8ff, 17, 26f; 5:2ff, 9ff, 14f, 18f, 22, 24, 29; 6:6, 9ff, 15f, 21f, 30; 7:1ff, 11, 13, 19ff, 28ff, 32; 8:1, 3f, 7ff, 12ff, 17, 19; 9:3, 6f, 9, 12f, 15, 17, 20, 22ff; 10:1f, 6, 10, 16, 18, 21, 23f; 11:1, 3, 5f, 9, 11, 16ff, 20ff; 12:1, 3, 12ff, 16f; 13:1ff, 5f, 8f, 11ff, 25; 14:1, 7, 9ff, 13ff, 20, 22; 15:1ff, 6, 9, 11, 15f, 19f; 16:1, 3, 5, 9ff, 14ff, 19, 21; 17:5, 7, 10, 13ff, 19ff, 24, 26; 18:1, 5f, 11, 13, 19, 23; 19:1, 3, 6, 11f, 14f; 20:1ff, 7f, 11ff, 16; 21:1f, 4, 7f, 10ff; 22:1ff, 5f, 8f, 11, 16, 18, 24, 29f; 23:1f, 4ff, 11f, 15ff, 23f, 28ff; 24:1, 3ff, 7f; 25:3ff, 7ff, 12, 15, 17, 27ff, 36f; 26:1f, 4, 7ff, 12f, 15f, 18ff; 27:1f, 4, 8, 11, 13, 15f, 18f, 21f; 28:1ff, 9, 11ff; 29:4, 7ff, 14ff, 19ff, 25f, 30ff; 30:1ff, 8ff, 17f, 21, 23f; 31:1ff, 6f, 10ff, 14ff, 20, 22f, 27f, 31ff, 40; 32:1, 3, 5f, 8, 14ff, 25ff, 30, 36, 42, 44; 33:1f, 4, 10ff, 16f, 19f, 23ff; 34:1f, 4f, 8, 12f, 17, 22; 35:1f, 4, 12f, 17ff; 36:1, 4ff, 26f, 29f; 37:2f, 6f, 9, 17, 20; 38:2f, 9, 14, 16f, 20f; 39:15ff; 40:1ff; 41:5; 42:2ff, 9, 11, 13, 15, 18ff; 43:1f, 4, 7f, 10; 44:2, 7, 11, 16, 21ff, 29f; 45:2ff; 46:1, 5, 10, 13, 15, 18, 23, 25f, 28; 47:1f, 4, 6f; 48:1, 8, 10, 12, 15, 25f, 30, 35, 38, 40, 42ff, 47; 49:1f, 5ff, 12ff, 16, 18, 20, 26, 28, 30ff, 34f, 37ff; 50:1, 4f, 7, 10, 13ff, 18, 20f, 24f, 28ff, 33ff, 40, 45; 51:1, 5ff, 10ff, 14, 19, 24ff, 29, 33, 36, 39, 45, 48, 50ff, 55ff, 62; 52:2f, 13, 17, 20;
Lamentations
1:5, 9, 11f, 14f, 17f, 20; 2:1f, 5ff, 17ff, 22; 3:18, 22, 24ff, 31, 36f, 40, 50, 55, 58f, 61, 64, 66; 4:11, 16, 20; 5:1, 19, 21;
Ezekiel
1:3, 28; 2:4; 3:11f, 14, 16, 22f, 27; 4:13f; 5:5, 7f, 11, 13, 15, 17; 6:1, 3, 7, 10f, 13f; 7:1f, 4f, 9, 19, 27; 8:1, 12, 14, 16; 9:4, 8f; 10:4, 18f; 11:1, 5, 7f, 10, 12ff, 21, 23, 25; 12:1, 8, 10, 15ff, 19ff, 23, 25f, 28; 13:1ff, 5ff, 13f, 16, 18, 20f, 23; 14:2, 4, 6ff, 11f, 14, 16, 18, 20f, 23; 15:1, 6ff; 16:1, 3, 8, 14, 19, 23, 30, 35f, 43, 48, 58f, 62f; 17:1, 3, 9, 11, 16, 19, 21f, 24; 18:1, 3, 9, 23, 25, 29f, 32; 20:1ff, 5, 7, 12, 19f, 26f, 30f, 33, 36, 38ff, 42, 44f, 47ff; 21:1, 3, 5, 7ff, 13, 17f, 24, 26, 28, 32; 22:1, 3, 12, 14, 16f, 19, 22f, 28, 31; 23:1, 22f, 28, 32, 34ff, 46, 49; 24:1, 3, 6, 9, 14f, 20f, 24, 27; 25:1, 3, 5ff, 11ff; 26:1, 3, 5ff, 14f, 19, 21; 27:1, 3; 28:1f, 6, 10ff, 20, 22ff; 29:1, 3, 6, 8f, 13, 16f, 19ff; 30:1ff, 6, 8, 10, 12f, 19f, 22, 25f; 31:1, 10, 15, 18; 32:1, 3, 8, 11, 14ff, 31f; 33:1, 11, 17, 20, 22f, 25, 27, 29f; 34:1f, 7ff, 15, 17, 20, 24, 27, 30f; 35:1, 3f, 6, 9ff, 14f; 36:1ff, 11, 13ff, 20, 22f, 32f, 36ff; 37:1, 3ff, 9, 12ff, 19, 21, 28; 38:1, 3, 10, 14, 17f, 21, 23; 39:1, 5ff, 10, 13, 17, 20, 22, 25, 28f; 40:1, 46; 41:22; 42:13; 43:4f, 18f, 24, 27; 44:2ff, 9, 12, 15, 27; 45:1, 4, 9, 15, 18, 23; 46:1, 3f, 9, 12ff, 16; 47:13, 23; 48:9f, 14, 29, 35;
Daniel
1:2, 10; 2:10, 47; 4:19, 24, 36; 5:1, 9f, 23; 6:17; 9:2ff, 7ff, 13ff, 19f; 10:16f, 19; 12:8;
Hosea
1:1f, 4, 7; 2:13, 16, 20f; 3:1, 5; 4:1, 10, 15f; 5:4, 6f; 6:1, 3; 7:10; 8:1, 13; 9:3ff, 14; 10:3, 12; 11:10f; 12:2, 5, 9, 13f; 13:4, 15; 14:1f, 9;
Joel
1:1, 9, 14f, 19; 2:1, 11ff, 17ff, 21, 23, 26f, 31f; 3:8, 11, 14, 16ff, 21;
Amos
1:2f, 5f, 8f, 11, 13, 15; 2:1, 3f, 6, 11, 16; 3:1, 6ff, 10ff, 15; 4:2f, 5f, 8ff, 13; 5:3f, 6, 8, 14ff, 20, 27; 6:8, 10f, 14; 7:1ff, 15ff; 8:1ff, 7, 9, 11f; 9:1, 5ff, 12f, 15;
Obadiah
1:1, 4, 8, 15, 18, 21;
Jonah
1:1, 3f, 9f, 14, 16f; 2:1f, 6f, 9f; 3:1, 3; 4:2ff, 6, 10;
Micah
1:1ff, 12; 2:3, 5, 7, 13; 3:4f, 8, 11; 4:1f, 4ff, 10, 12f; 5:4, 7, 10; 6:1f, 5ff; 7:7ff, 17;
Nahum
1:2f, 7, 9, 11f, 14; 2:2, 13; 3:5;
Habakkuk
1:2, 12; 2:2, 13f, 16, 20; 3:2, 8, 18f;
Zephaniah
1:1ff, 5ff, 10, 12, 14, 17f; 2:2f, 5, 7, 9ff; 3:2, 5, 8f, 12, 15, 17, 20;
Haggai
1:1ff, 5, 7ff, 12ff; 2:1, 4, 6ff, 14f, 17f, 20, 23;
Zechariah
1:1ff, 6f, 9ff, 16f, 20; 2:5f, 8ff; 3:1f, 5ff, 9f; 4:4ff, 8ff, 13f; 5:4; 6:4f, 9, 12ff; 7:1ff, 7ff, 12f; 8:1ff, 6f, 9, 11, 14, 17ff; 9:1, 4, 14ff; 10:1, 3, 5ff, 12; 11:4ff, 11, 13, 15; 12:1, 4f, 7f; 13:2f, 7ff; 14:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12f, 16ff, 20f;
Malachi
1:1f, 4ff; 2:2, 4, 7f, 11ff, 16f; 3:1, 3ff, 10ff, 16f; 4:1, 3, 5;
An Obvious Double Standard
In light of this clear evidence, I have a question for you to consider. If the 70 translators of the Septuagint believed they had license to replace Yahweh’s name, arguably the single most important word in the Old Testament Hebrew Scriptures, with an impersonal Greek title more than 6,500 times, what other changes would they have felt justified in making? Would lengthening the chronology of the Old Testament by 1300 years in order to make it align more closely with the Ptolemaic Egyptian chronology of their day also fit under this purview?
I admit that I’m baffled by the logic of Mr. Woodward and those who hold the Rabbinic manipulation conspiracy theory. Are we really to believe that the Hebrew MT of the Bible cannot be trusted because (based upon only circumstantial evidence) the Jewish Rabbis are accused of changing certain passages of the original Hebrew text of the Bible to obfuscate the messianic identity of Yeshua (Jesus). Yet astoundingly, the very act (modifying the original Hebrew text of the OT) for which the Jewish Rabbis are libelously accused, we know in fact was committed by the translators of the Septuagint.
I mean come on. Sure it is important to talk about the differences in chronology and words between the LXX and MT versions of the OT, but why the need to throw the Jewish Rabbis of the 2nd century AD under the bus with inflammatory rhetoric based only upon circumstantial evidence? What real purpose does it serve other than to inflame passions and provide fertile ground for the seeds of anti-Semitism to be reborn?
I want to repeat something here. I believe both the Septuagint (LXX) and Masoretic (MT) texts of the Old Testament provide more than enough evidence to prove that Yeshua (Jesus) was the Jewish Messiah promised in the Scriptures. Sure the chronology of the Old Testament is roughly 1300 years longer in the LXX than the MT text. But as I’ll demonstrate in Part II of this series, far from the MT undermining the case for Yeshua as the promised Messiah (as is argued by the Rabbinic conspiracy theorists), the MT chronology of the Old Testament provides compelling proof of the opposite. In fact, it can be demonstrated that the MT of the Scriptures shows that Yeshua came at the beginning of what the Jewish people considered the Messianic age. Further it can be shown that the major milestones in Yahweh’s redemptive plan for mankind, and Yeshua’s pivotal part in that plan, can only be seen in its intended magnificence within the chronological framework of the Old Testament as given in the MT text of the Old Testament.
Yahweh willing I’ll do my best to demonstrate this in Part II of this series.
Maranatha!
The Mystery of Immanuel
In many ways it seems unfathomable to me that Yahweh, our Creator, and creator of the physical world around us, desires fellowship with His Creation. If we were to step back and look at the Biblical story with a wider angle lens one could say that the overreaching theme of the Bible is the story of mankind’s lost fellowship with Yahweh (due to our sin) and His merciful efforts to reestablish that fellowship at all costs. For whatever unfathomable reason, Yahweh desires Immanuel, that is, He desires to be with us, to dwell with His creation.
Isaiah 7:13-14
13 And he said, Hear ye now, O house of David; Is it a small thing for you to weary men, but will ye weary my God also? 14 Therefore YHWH himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
Matthew 1:20-23
20 But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of YHWH appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost. 21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins. 22
Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of YHWH by the prophet, saying, 23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
In this week’s article I’d like to give you another way of looking at the mystery of Immanuel. We’ll start by stepping back in time to the first Immanuel (God with Us), back to the time when Adam and Eve walked with God in Eden. We briefly look at the consequences of their fall and then moving forward in Biblical history, the thrilling efforts of Yahweh to reestablish that lost fellowship with mankind. Along the way, I’ll mark these events for you within the context of Bible chronology (found in the Hebrew (MT) of the Scriptures) and the Jubilee cycles. This exploration, I believe, will leave you with the profound realization that Yahweh is indeed actively engaged in the affairs of mankind in an effort to reconcile us to Himself. That reconciliation, that salvation, we will see is realized in Yeshua (Jesus) – that is – Yahweh’s Salvation. (Remember it is no accident that Yeshua (Jesus) is the Hebrew word meaning Yahweh’s Salvation)
Eden – The 1st Immanuel
So let’s start in the beginning with the word of Yahweh:
John 1:1-14
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. 7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. 8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. 9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. 10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. 11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not. 12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. 14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Genesis 3:7-8
7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons. 8 And they heard the voice of YHWH God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of YHWH God amongst the trees of the garden.
I think it is fair to say, that as with Adam and Eve so too with us today, sin (no matter the promised benefits) causes separation from our Creator. From that initial act of Edenic rebellion, mankind (in general) fell out of fellowship with Yahweh, and that fall brought death upon the human race. Thankfully, the story didn’t end with Adam and Eve’s death and the demise of the human race. Yahweh graciously offered mankind a seed of hope! That hope came in the form of a promise that Adam and Eve’s own “seed” would someday “bruise” the serpent’s head:
Sinai – The 2nd Immanuel
Our next stop in our quest to follow Yahweh’s meeting with mankind – His Immanuel (God with Us) comes after Israel’s Exodus from Egypt. 2500 years after Eden Yahweh once more chose to meet with mankind. Indeed there were other instances when Yahweh or his messengers spoke with individuals but it wasn’t until Sinai that the Bible records Yahweh once more choosing a specific location to meet with mankind. That meeting place was a mountain where Yahweh spoke to all of the children of Israel. After this initial meeting with Israel, Yahweh charged Moses to build Him a tabernacle where He could temporarily dwell in the midst of Israel.
Exodus 29:42-46 42 This shall be a continual burnt offering throughout your generations at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation before YHWH: where I will meet you, to speak there unto thee. 43 And there I will meet with the children of Israel, and the tabernacle shall be sanctified by my glory.44 And I will sanctify the tabernacle of the congregation, and the altar: I will sanctify also both Aaron and his sons, to minister to me in the priest’s office. 45 And I will dwell among the children of Israel, and will be their God. 46 And they shall know that I am YHWH their God, that brought them forth out of the land of Egypt, that I may dwell among them: I am YHWH their God.
Exodus 33:8-11 8 And it came to pass, when Moses went out unto the tabernacle, that all the people rose up, and stood every man at his tent door, and looked after Moses, until he was gone into the tabernacle. 9 And it came to pass, as Moses entered into the tabernacle, the cloudy pillar descended, and stood at the door of the tabernacle, and YHWH talked with Moses. 10 And all the people saw the cloudy pillar stand at the tabernacle door: and all the people rose up and worshipped, every man in his tent door. 11 And YHWH spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend. And he turned again into the camp: but his servant Joshua, the son of Nun, a young man, departed not out of the tabernacle.
A couple things strike me here from this passage above. First of all, the passage here tells us that Moses spoke “face to face” with Yahweh like someone talks to their friend. This type of intimacy between God and mankind was last recorded in Eden.
Second, Joshua remained in the tabernacle after Moses finished talking to Yahweh. I can’t help but think there is some added significance here as Joshua is but the English version of the Hebrew Yeshua or as the name is commonly known by us today as Jesus – the name meaning Yahweh’s Salvation.
So it was in the wilderness of Sinai in the 52nd (13×4) jubilee cycle after Eden that Yahweh once more chose a dwelling place to meet with mankind. This new dwelling place was temporary and by its nature created a barrier between God and man.
This barrier was necessary because of mankind’s fallen state. I think it fair to say, that the tabernacle was not constructed to contain Yahweh but rather to protect mankind (in our fallen state) from the righteousness of Yahweh. For the next several centuries the tabernacle made by Yahweh’s instruction in the 2nd year of the Exodus became the meeting place between God and man.
Jerusalem – The 3rd Immanuel in Solomon’s Temple
Almost 500 years later during the 62nd Jubilee cycle from Adam, Yahweh chose a more permanent location to meet with mankind. Gone was the wilderness animal skin covered tent (tabernacle) of Sinai and in its place the gold plated temple of Solomon was built. This new dwelling place, where Yahweh met with mankind was built after a pattern shown to king David and then constructed by David’s son Solomon.
Deuteronomy 12:10-11
10 But when ye go over Jordan, and dwell in the land which YHWH your God giveth you to inherit, and when he giveth you rest from all your enemies round about, so that ye dwell in safety; 11 Then there shall be a place which YHWH your God shall choose to cause his name to dwell there; thither shall ye bring all that I command you; your burnt offerings, and your sacrifices, your tithes, and the heave offering of your hand, and all your choice vows which ye vow unto YHWH:
1 Kings 8:1-29
Then Solomon assembled the elders of Israel, and all the heads of the tribes, the chief of the fathers of the children of Israel, unto king Solomon in Jerusalem, that they might bring up the ark of the covenant of YHWH out of the city of David, which is Zion.
2 And all the men of Israel assembled themselves unto king Solomon at the feast in the month Ethanim, which is the seventh month. 3 And all the elders of Israel came, and the priests took up the ark. 4 And they brought up the ark of YHWH, and the tabernacle of the congregation, and all the holy vessels that were in the tabernacle, even those did the priests and the Levites bring up…
6 And the priests brought in the ark of the covenant of YHWH unto his place, into the oracle of the house, to the most holy place, even under the wings of the cherubims…
9 There was nothing in the ark save the two tables of stone, which Moses put there at Horeb, when YHWH made a covenant with the children of Israel, when they came out of the land of Egypt. 10 And it came to pass, when the priests were come out of the holy place, that the cloud filled the house of YHWH,…
To give you a little bit of the back story about our next Immanuel, just over 400 years after the completion of Solomon’s temple in the 70th jubilee from Adam, the book of Ezekiel chapters 8-10 records the departure of Yahweh’s presence from Solomon’s temple. This departure of His shekinah (glory) from His holy temple was due to the abominations committed by Israel. 6 years after Yahweh’s departure, Solomon’s temple was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar’s armies.
It is worth further noting here that the 70th jubilee from Adam was particularly pivotal in Yahweh’s plans for Israel and the coming Messiah. As the following chart shows, the 70th jubilee originated three separate 70 years periods of time that played a particularly important role in the chronology of the 2nd temple era.
Those 70 year periods were as follows:
70 years captivity of Judah (Jer. 25:12; 29:10)
70 years of Divine anger (Zech. 1:12)
70 year between the 1st & 2nd temple (2 Kings 25:8-9; Ezra 6:14-17)
Jerusalem – The 4th Immanuel
Just 70 years after Yahweh’s departure from Solomon’s temple, the book of Zechariah tells us that Yahweh had returned to Jerusalem “with mercy”. What’s so important to understand here is that 16 years earlier in 536 BC Cyrus of Persia had allowed the Jewish people to return and build the temple. This return ended the 70 years captivity of Judah. (see chart). Having been granted permission to rebuilt the temple in 536 BC, by 520 BC in the 2nd year of Darius I (16 years later) the Jewish people had not even completed the temple foundation.
Then as Zechariah 1 and Haggai 1 both describe, Yahweh gave a divine command to the Jewish people to return and build His sanctuary. As you’ll read in the following excerpted passages, Yahweh had “returned to Jerusalem with mercies” and reassured the Jewish people that “I am with you”. Yahweh’s divine anger had ended and He wanted the Jewish people to finish rebuilding His house. Please take a moment to read these passages, so you get a sense of what is going on here in the 2nd year of Darius.
Zechariah 1:2-17 7 Upon the four and twentieth day of the eleventh month, which is the month Sebat, in the second year of Darius, came the word of YHWH unto Zechariah….
12Then the angel of YHWH answered and said, O YHWH of hosts, how long wilt thou not have mercy on Jerusalem and on the cities of Judah, against which thou hast had indignation these threescore and ten years? 13 And YHWH answered the angel that talked with me with good words and comfortable words…
16 Therefore thus saith YHWH; I am returned to Jerusalem with mercies: my house shall be built in it, saith YHWH of hosts, and a line shall be stretched forth upon Jerusalem. 17 Cry yet, saying, Thus saith YHWH of hosts; My cities through prosperity shall yet be spread abroad; and YHWH shall yet comfort Zion, and shall yet choose Jerusalem.
Haggai 1:1 – 15
In the second year of Darius the king, in the sixth month, in the first day of the month, came the word of YHWH by Haggai the prophet unto Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, governor of Judah, and to Joshua the son of Josedech, the high priest, saying, 2 Thus speaketh YHWH of hosts, saying, This people say, The time is not come, the time that YHWH’S house should be built. 3 Then came the word of YHWH by Haggai the prophet, saying, 4 Is it time for you, O ye, to dwell in your cieled houses, and this house lie waste?…
7 Thus saith YHWH of hosts; Consider your ways. 8 Go up to the mountain, and bring wood, and build the house; and I will take pleasure in it, and I will be glorified, saith YHWH….
12 Then Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and Joshua the son of Josedech, the high priest, with all the remnant of the people, obeyed the voice of YHWH their God, and the words of Haggai the prophet, as YHWH their God had sent him, and the people did fear before YHWH. 13 Then spake Haggai YHWH’S messenger in YHWH’S message unto the people, saying, I am with you, saith YHWH.
14And YHWH stirred up the spirit of Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, governor of Judah, and the spirit of Joshua the son of Josedech, the high priest, and the spirit of all the remnant of the people; and they came and did work in the house of YHWH of hosts, their God, 15 In the four and twentieth day of the sixth month, in the second year of Darius the king.
The Temple was the Dwelling Place of Yahweh
I love this part of the Immanuel story, it is so wonderful to see the rich context of Yahweh’s redemptive plan for mankind and ordered manner in which He carries it out. Yahweh had returned to Jerusalem and told the people that he was with them in their efforts to rebuild His dwelling place.
Leading the reconstruction efforts were Joshua (Yeshua in Hebrew) the high priest and Zerubbabel the governor. In the book of Haggai and Zechariah a messianic aura is woven around both these men. At the bottom of this article I’ve provided some of the more clearly messianic and prophetic passages for your review. It is so worth your time to read through them and then the fuller passages to get the complete context.
In any case, as here in what I’m calling the 4th Immanuel, Yahweh had returned to Jerusalem with mercy and desired to once again dwell with His people.
Yeshua – The 5th Immanuel
In the midst of the window of time in which Yahweh gave His divine command to restore and build Jerusalem to the Jewish people through Haggai and Zechariah, a profoundly important statement is made which had direct bearing on the coming of Messiah. Consider the progressive revelation of the following excerpted passages from Haggai 2:
Haggai 2:5-7 According to the word that I covenanted with you when ye came out of Egypt, so my spirit remaineth among you: fear ye not. 6 For thus saith YHWH of hosts; Yet once, it is a little while, and I will shake the heavens, and the earth, and the sea, and the dry land; 7 And I will shake all nations, and the desire of all nations shall come: and I will fill this house with glory, saith YHWH of hosts.
Haggai 2:9 The glory of this latter house shall be greater than of the former, saith YHWH of hosts: and in this place will I give peace, saith YHWH of hosts.
Haggai 2:15-23 And now, I pray you, consider from this day and upward, from before a stone was laid upon a stone in the temple of YHWH:..
18 Consider now from this day and upward, from the four and twentieth day of the ninth month, even from the day that the foundation of YHWH’S temple was laid, consider it…
from this day will I bless you.
As I’ve shared with you in my book and articles over the years, if you count forward from 24th day of the 9th month in the 2nd year of Darius I (520 BC) there were 515.05 Biblical lunar/solar years until Hanukah in the year 5 BC. These 515 years fulfill 70 Seven periods of time as prophesied in Daniel 9. (For more details see my article Seven, 70, & Sevens: Daniel 9 & the Bible’s Messianic Symbolism)
A reasonable Biblical and historical case can be made that Yeshua of Nazareth was conceived in the winter of 5 BC and 9 months later was born during the Feast of Tabernacles in 4 BC.
Today the birth of the Yeshua (Jesus) gets is honored as the miracle of the season, but in reality the true miracle of Immanuel was that moment when the divine spark of Yahweh became flesh in the human incarnation of Yeshua – that moment when the hopeless darkness of mankind existence was pierced by the light of God and Yahweh took on the temple of human flesh.
John 8:12 2 Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.
John 9:5 As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.
John 10:22-23 22 And it was at Jerusalem the feast of the dedication, and it was winter. 23 And Jesus walked in the temple in Solomon’s porch.
Do you realize that Yeshua made the above statements at the Feast of Dedication (Hanukkah) – a festival where the Jewish people commemorated the cleansing and rededication of the temple by Judas Maccabaeus? Can you picture Yeshua standing in the brilliant light of the temple mount candelabra telling His audience that He was “the light of the world”? Do you understand how congruent this picture is?
John 1:1-5
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
Isaiah 9:2-7
2 The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined….
6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. 7 Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of YHWH of hosts will perform this.
As we’ve followed Yahweh’s Immanuel appointments with mankind through the Biblical ages I hope that I’ve strengthened your faith in the Biblical case for Yahweh’s love for you and His willingness to humble Himself and take on humans flesh so that He could stand in our place when the righteous penalty for our sins was carried out. Yeshua conception and birth in the 82nd jubilee cycle from Adam fits precisely in Yahweh’s ongoing redemptive plan for mankind. It is my hope that this year as you remember the reason for the season you’ll consider the conception and birth of Yeshua in light of Yahweh’s desire to restore mankind to their intended state.
Maranatha!
Acts 3:25 – 4:1 Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed. 26 Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.
Isaiah 9:6-7 6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. 7 Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of YHWH of hosts will perform this.
Revelation 21:10-16 0 And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God, 11 Having the glory of God: and her light was like unto a stone most precious, even like a jasper stone, clear as crystal; 12 And had a wall great and high, and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel: 13 On the east three gates; on the north three gates; on the south three gates; and on the west three gates. 14 And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb. 15 And he that talked with me had a golden reed to measure the city, and the gates thereof, and the wall thereof.
16 And the city lieth foursquare, and the length is as large as the breadth: and he measured the city with the reed, twelve thousand furlongs. The length and the breadth and the height of it are equal.
The Promised Seed
For those who would like to explore another thread of this wonderful story. Here is some symmetry to the jubilee cycles and their relationship to the promised seed.
The Birth of Seth Confirms the Promise of the Seed
In Adam’s 130th year (13×10) the line of the promised seed was keep alive in the birth of Seth. Seth’s birth took place in the 3rd jubilee of Adam’s life.
Noah’s Flood – the Consequence of Unrestrained Sin
Sin has profound consequences. We only need to move forward roughly 1656 years from Adam and Eve’s sin to see that the darkness, that Satan’s deception wrought, far from elevating mankind to the status of gods, it had metastasized to the point that it had nearly brought about mankind’s demise.
Genesis 6:11-13
11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence. 12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth. 13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.
Genesis 9:1
And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.
Sobering, isn’t it? After 1656 years from Adam’s sin only 8 souls where left who were thought worthy to escape the judgment of the flood.
Abraham and the Covenant of the Seed
Yahweh’s promise concerning the “seed” of Adam and Eve was confirmed after the flood with the birth of Isaac in Abraham’s 100th year which was 40 jubilee cycles from birth of Adam’s seed Seth in the 3rd Jubilee from Adam.
Genesis 17:17-22 17 Then Abraham fell upon his face, and laughed, and said in his heart, Shall a child be born unto him that is an hundred years old? and shall Sarah, that is ninety years old, bear? 18 And Abraham said unto God, O that Ishmael might live before thee! 19 And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him.
20 And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee: Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation. 21 But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time [mow’ed] in the next year. 22 And he left off talking with him, and God went up from Abraham.
A few years later, when Isaac was still a boy or young man, in Genesis 22 Yahweh unfolds a bit more of His redemptive plan by swearing (shaba) an oath (shebuw’ah) with Abraham which explained that through Abraham’s “seed” all nations of the earth would be blessed. (For more on this see Seven, 70, Sevens: Daniel 9 & the Bible’s Messianic Symbolism)
This oath swearing with Abraham by Yahweh was in response to Abraham’s demonstration of faith in his willingness to offer up Isaac as Yahweh commanded and Abraham’s unwavering faith that he and Isaac would come back down from that mountain together. Don’t forget it was Isaac who was Abraham and Sarah’s son of their old age and Yahweh had already promised that in Isaac, Yahweh would establish His covenant of the seed.
Genesis 22:11-18 11 And the angel of YHWH called unto him out of heaven, and said, Abraham, Abraham: and he said, Here am I. 12 And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me.
13 And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold behind him a ram caught in a thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in the stead of his son. 14 And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh: as it is said to this day, In the mount of YHWH it shall be seen. 15 And the angel of YHWH called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time, 16 And said, By myself have I sworn [shaba], saith YHWH, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son: 17 That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;
18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice.
One of the fascinating aspects of this subject is the symmetry with which these events were fulfilled when seen within a continuous jubilee cycle originating with the creation of Adam. From the birth of Seth to the birth of Isaac there was an interval of 40 jubilee cycles. 40 jubilee cycles after the birth of Isaac the oath Yahweh sworn with Abraham concerning his “seed” blessing all nations of the earth was fulfilled when Yeshua reconciled all mankind to Yahweh by His death and resurrection.
Romans 5:8-12
8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. 9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. 10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. 11 And not only so, but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement. 12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
Also worth noting is that Seth was born in the 3rd jubilee of Adams life, Isaac was born in 2nd jubilee of Abraham’s life, and Yeshua fulfilled His destiny as the lamb of God which taketh away the sins of the world in the 1st jubilee of His life.
Here are some verses related to the Messianic theme of Haggai and Zechariah
Zechariah 2:1-5
I lifted up mine eyes again, and looked, and behold a man with a measuring line in his hand. 2 Then said I, Whither goest thou? And he said unto me, To measure Jerusalem, to see what is the breadth thereof, and what is the length thereof. 3 And, behold, the angel that talked with me went forth, and another angel went out to meet him, 4 And said unto him, Run, speak to this young man, saying, Jerusalem shall be inhabited as towns without walls for the multitude of men and cattle therein: 5 For I, saith YHWH, will be unto her a wall of fire round about, and will be the glory in the midst of her.
Zechariah 2:10-13
10 Sing and rejoice, O daughter of Zion: for, lo, I come, and I will dwell in the midst of thee, saith YHWH. 11 And many nations shall be joined to YHWH in that day, and shall be my people: and I will dwell in the midst of thee, and thou shalt know that YHWH of hosts hath sent me unto thee. 12 And YHWH shall inherit Judah his portion in the holy land, and shall choose Jerusalem again. 13 Be silent, O all flesh, before YHWH: for he is raised up out of his holy habitation.
Zechariah 3:8-10
8 Hear now, O Joshua the high priest, thou, and thy fellows that sit before thee: for they are men wondered at: for, behold, I will bring forth my servant the BRANCH. 9 For behold the stone that I have laid before Joshua; upon one stone shall be seven eyes: behold, I will engrave the graving thereof, saith YHWH of hosts, and I will remove the iniquity of that land in one day. 10 In that day, saith YHWH of hosts, shall ye call every man his neighbour under the vine and under the fig tree.
Zechariah 4:6-10
6 Then he answered and spake unto me, saying, This is the word of YHWH unto Zerubbabel, saying, Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, saith YHWH of hosts. 7 Who art thou, O great mountain? before Zerubbabel thou shalt become a plain: and he shall bring forth the headstone thereof with shoutings, crying, Grace, grace unto it. 8 Moreover the word of YHWH came unto me, saying, 9 The hands of Zerubbabel have laid the foundation of this house; his hands shall also finish it; and thou shalt know that YHWH of hosts hath sent me unto you. 10 For who hath despised the day of small things? for they shall rejoice, and shall see the plummet in the hand of Zerubbabel with those seven; they are the eyes of YHWH, which run to and fro through the whole earth.
Zechariah 6:11-13
11 Then take silver and gold, and make crowns, and set them upon the head of Joshua the son of Josedech, the high priest; 12 And speak unto him, saying, Thus speaketh YHWH of hosts, saying, Behold the man whose name is The BRANCH; and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the temple of YHWH: 13 Even he shall build the temple of YHWH; and he shall bear the glory, and shall sit and rule upon his throne; and he shall be a priest upon his throne: and the counsel of peace shall be between them both.
Zechariah 8:1-3
Again the word of YHWH of hosts came to me, saying, 2 Thus saith YHWH of hosts; I was jealous for Zion with great jealousy, and I was jealous for her with great fury. 3 Thus saith YHWH; I am returned unto Zion, and will dwell in the midst of Jerusalem: and Jerusalem shall be called a city of truth; and the mountain of YHWH of hosts the holy mountain.
Zechariah 8:22-23
Yea, many people and strong nations shall come to seek YHWH of hosts in Jerusalem, and to pray before YHWH. 23 Thus saith YHWH of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you.
Zechariah 11:10-14
10 And I took my staff, even Beauty, and cut it asunder, that I might break my covenant which I had made with all the people. 11 And it was broken in that day: and so the poor of the flock that waited upon me knew that it was the word of YHWH. 12 And I said unto them, If ye think good, give me my price; and if not, forbear. So they weighed for my price thirty pieces of silver. 13 And YHWH said unto me, Cast it unto the potter: a goodly price that I was prised at of them. And I took the thirty pieces of silver, and cast them to the potter in the house of YHWH. 14 Then I cut asunder mine other staff, even Bands, that I might break the brotherhood between Judah and Israel.
Zechariah 12:2-10
2 Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against Jerusalem. 3 And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it. 4 In that day, saith YHWH, I will smite every horse with astonishment, and his rider with madness: and I will open mine eyes upon the house of Judah, and will smite every horse of the people with blindness. 5 And the governors of Judah shall say in their heart, The inhabitants of Jerusalem shall be my strength in YHWH of hosts their God. 6 In that day will I make the governors of Judah like an hearth of fire among the wood, and like a torch of fire in a sheaf; and they shall devour all the people round about, on the right hand and on the left: and Jerusalem shall be inhabited again in her own place, even in Jerusalem. 7 YHWH also shall save the tents of Judah first, that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem do not magnify themselves against Judah. 8 In that day shall YHWH defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem; and he that is feeble among them at that day shall be as David; and the house of David shall be as God, as the angel of YHWH before them. 9 And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem. 10 And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn.
Zechariah 13:1-2
In that day there shall be a fountain opened to the house of David and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem for sin and for uncleanness. 2 And it shall come to pass in that day, saith YHWH of hosts, that I will cut off the names of the idols out of the land, and they shall no more be remembered: and also I will cause the prophets and the unclean spirit to pass out of the land.
Zechariah 14:1-9
Behold, the day of YHWH cometh, and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee. 2 For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city. 3 Then shall YHWH go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle. 4 And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south. 5 And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and YHWH my God shall come, and all the saints with thee. 6 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the light shall not be clear, nor dark: 7 But it shall be one day which shall be known to YHWH, not day, nor night: but it shall come to pass, that at evening time it shall be light. 8 And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem; half of them toward the former sea, and half of them toward the hinder sea: in summer and in winter shall it be. 9 And YHWH shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD, and his name one.
Zechariah 14:20 0 In that day shall there be upon the bells of the horses, HOLINESS UNTO YHWH; and the pots in YHWH’S house shall be like the bowls before the altar.
The Priests & Levites of Ezra & Nehemiah: Exploring the Papponymy Assumption
If I told you that today in this article I was going to set aside the most natural plain sense reading of the books of Ezra and Nehemiah and instead adjust their chronology because this specific era in Biblical history doesn’t jive with what we know from secular sources, what would your reaction be?
My hope is that such an approach would raise all sorts of red flags to you as it should all of us when someone takes such liberties with the Biblical record. I believe the Bible should be read with the assumption that it is an accurate and reasonable rendering of real history. When it makes a historical statement, I believe our primary response should be to take it at face value and in good faith. Only after we have clear guidance from the context and related passages should we look for an alternative interpretation. This is what many call the Golden Rule of Biblical Interpretation as most eloquently described by Dr. David Cooper:
“When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense; therefore, take every word at its primary, ordinary, usual, literal meaning unless the facts of the immediate context, studied in the light of related passages and axiomatic and fundamental truths, indicate clearly otherwise.” –Dr. David L. Cooper (1886-1965),
I can tell you that the times I’ve made the greatest interpretational errors have been when I’ve ignored this Rule of Biblical Interpretation.
While most scholars believe this rule is a valuable guild when interpreting the Scripture, I can tell you it is easier said than done. Which brings me to today’s subject. There is one place in the Biblical record where even some of the most notable Biblical scholars of our day still stumble over this rule. That place is the 2nd temple era chronology of Ezra and Nehemiah in general and more particularly the chronology of the priests and Levites mentioned in these books.
The more I’ve studied this subject the more disconcerting it is to see the length many of my peers go to discount a common sense reading of Ezra and Nehemiah. Case in point, the following quote comes from Mr. Lanser’s (of Associates for Biblical Research) article The Seraiah Assumption where he takes my writings on the 2nd temple era to task. In the following quote I’ve excerpted from Mr. Lanser’s article so I’d encourage you to read the entire article to get the full context. As you’ll see Mr. Lanser starts out on the right foot, but then abandons his own criteria without actually applying the context he admits is necessary to ascertain an accurate understanding of the passage. Please note, as I’ll explain more fully below, Mr. Lanser is explaining why the priests and Levites as enumerated in Nehemiah 10 & 12 cannot be taken in their most natural and plain sense understanding, but must be read papponymically (i.e. common names do not necessary refer to the same person but can refer to an ancestor by the same name).
Some—notably Jeshua, Seraiah, Azariah, Meshullam and Shallum—demonstrate the phenomenon of papponymy, where a man’s name skips a generation and shows up again in a grandson. This phenomenon means keying on name repetitions alone is not a reliable way to construct a chronology. There is also the ambiguity raised by the repeated use of culturally common names among unrelated people. Anyone who has paid any attention to genealogies in Scripture has noticed that the same names are used for many different individuals. (The Seraiah Assumption by Rick Lanser)
With such examples before us, how can we possibly use name matching alone to claim that Sir Robert Anderson erred in understanding “Artaxerxes” in Ezra 6:14 as Artaxerxes I Longimanus? Confronted with biblical evidence that using the same names in multiple generations was a common thing, we cannot simply find the same names in different lists of priests, Levites or gatekeepers, and claim that this repetition proves they were the same person. The only way to tell if a given name refers to the same person is by context and tying in at least some other names in an ancestral line. (The Seraiah Assumption by Rick Lanser)
Regarding Ezra’s and Nehemiah’s relationship to the priests and Levites of Nehemiah 10 and 12, Mr. Lanser concludes with the following summary in his section on Answering Struse’s Six Biblical Challenges:
-
- The priests and Levites of Nehemiah 10 are from the third post-exilic generation, when Ezra read the Law to the people when Nehemiah was governor and Eliashib was high priest, while those listed in Nehemiah 12:1–9 were from the original post-exilic generation under Zerubbabel and Jeshua. The name repetitions must be attributed to papponymy and the use of culturally common names—identical names, but not identical individuals. (The Seraiah Assumption by Rick Lanser)
I again I encourage each of you to go back and read Mr. Lanser’s entire article again (here) to get the full context of his words. You’ll find his fuller thoughts on the subject under the heading Examining the Eliashib Assumption.
The Papponymy Assumption
Here is the crux of the problem. Many of the priests and Levites who came up with Joshua and Zerubbabel in the 1st year of Cyrus (536 BC) appear in the list of priests and Levites who were sealed with Nehemiah in the 20/21st year of a Persian “Artaxerxes”. If the Artaxerxes of Nehemiah be the Persian king Longimanus (as Mr. Lanser and many of our peers claim) then many of those priests and Levites would have been 120+ years old. This proposition nearly all Biblical scholars (including Mr. Lanser) agree is untenable.
To get around this difficult problem Mr. Lanser and most of his peers resort to some variation of a Papponymy Assumption. What that means, is Mr. Lanser must assume that same names given in the lists of Nehemiah 10 and 12 are not the same men but rather one of their descendants who bore the same name generations later.
Mr. Lanser is correct that the Bible often uses the same name in succeeding generations but having said that, this in no way gives us license to automatically assume papponymy and discount the most natural reading of the text. What is most disconcerting about Mr. Lanser’s conclusion above is that in his article he didn’t even take the time to show why he believes the names found in Nehemiah 10 and 12 were used papponymically.
In this week’s article I’ll show you why the priests and Levites of Nehemiah 10 and 12 are not papponymic lists separated by decades but rather straight forward chronological statements that prove Ezra and Nehemiah were contemporaries of Jeshua and his son Joiakim, the high priests, as well as contemporaries of Darius I ‘The Great’ whom the Bible identifies as “Artaxerxes”.
Who Returned with Joshua and Zerubbabel?
Our exploration of the subject begins with the decree of Cyrus and the first group of priests and Levites repatriated to Judea and Jerusalem. We start with the accounts of Ezra and Nehemiah:
Ezra 2:1-2 Now these are the children of the province that went up out of the captivity, of those which had been carried away, whom Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon had carried away unto Babylon, and came again unto Jerusalem and Judah, every one unto his city; 2 Which came with Zerubbabel: Jeshua, Nehemiah, Seraiah, Reelaiah, Mordecai, Bilshan, Mispar, Bigvai, Rehum, Baanah…
Nehemiah 7:5-7 5 And my God put into mine heart to gather together the nobles, and the rulers, and the people, that they might be reckoned by genealogy. And I found a register of the genealogy of them which came up at the first, and found written therein,
6 These are the children of the province, that went up out of the captivity, of those that had been carried away, whom Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon had carried away, and came again to Jerusalem and to Judah, every one unto his city; 7 Who came with Zerubbabel, Jeshua, Nehemiah, Azariah, Raamiah, Nahamani, Mordecai, Bilshan, Mispereth, Bigvai, Nehum, Baanah.
Taken at face value these two passages give us a list of a group of core leading men who returned with Joshua and Zerubbabel after Cyrus allowed the Jewish captives to return in 536 BC. As I demonstrated in my last couple of articles (here & here) the Mordecai listed in these two passages is most likely the Mordecai of the book of Esther. After evaluating the evidence presented in this article I believe you’ll find a compelling reason to conclude that the Nehemiah mentioned in these passages is in fact the same man who nearly thirty-six years later would become the governor of Jerusalem as described in the book that bears his name.
The 2nd Year of the Return
Year two of the Jewish people’s return to Jerusalem was marked by the auspicious effort of rebuilding Yahweh’s desolate sanctuary. The following passage is especially worthy of note because it introduces us to some of the leading men and their families who were responsible for the commencement of the rebuilding efforts.
Ezra 3:8-9 8 Now in the second year [535 BC] of their coming unto the house of God at Jerusalem, in the second month, began Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and the remnant of their brethren the priests and the Levites, and all they that were come out of the captivity unto Jerusalem; and appointed the Levites, from twenty years old and upward, to set forward the work of the house of YHWH.
9 Then stood Jeshua with his sons and his brethren, Kadmiel and his sons, the sons of Judah, together, to set forward the workmen in the house of God: the sons of Henadad, with their sons and their brethren the Levites.
The reconstruction efforts on the temple were begun with Jeshua (the high priest – a.k.a Joshua) and his sons, Kadmiel and his sons, the sons of Judah, and the sons of Henadad and their brethren the Levites. These are important people who are mentioned throughout the books of Ezra and Nehemiah so mark them carefully. Worthy of note is that the text seems to indicate that neither Judah nor Henadad were present but only their “sons”. As you’ll see this distinction is congruent as the history of Ezra and Nehemiah unfolds.
Ezra Reads the Law to Israel
After the wall of Jerusalem had been built and the gates restored in the 7th month of that year, all Israel gathered in Jerusalem to read the law of Yahweh during the Feast of Sukkoth as is commanded in the 7th year of the Sabbath cycle (Shemitah). On the following 24th day of that month as Israel was fasting and praising Yahweh we once again meet men named Jeshua and Kadmiel.
Now it is true that there was the high priest Jeshua (Joshua) and two Levites named Jeshua. But in the passages that mention them if read carefully most of the time they can be distinguished from one another. Of the two Levites named Jeshua, one was the son of Azaniah (Neh. 10:9) and the other was the son of Kadmiel (Nehemiah 12:24). In fact Nehemiah 10:9 mentions “both” Jeshua, son of Azaniah and mentions Kadmiel in the same verse. Remember in the passage above where the “sons of Henadad” were mentioned? Well, Nehemiah 10:1-13 also mentions both Jeshua’s, Kadmiel as well as Binnui the son of Henadad. For context sake keep in mind here that Nehemiah 10 is in the 20th year of a Persian “Artaxerxes”.
As you read the following passages remember that they describe events that take place in roughly the 21st year of a Persian king “Artaxerxes” if this Persian king is Darius I then the following passages can be read in the straight forward manner in which they are given.
If on the other hand the Persian king “Artaxerxes” is Longimanus as Mr. Lanser suggests then these passages cannot be taken at face value and we must assume that even though the men and their relationships to each other are nearly identical they cannot be father and son relationships but rather papponymic and an unknown number of generations separates both groups of men. What do you think is the most reasonable reading of these passages?
Ezra 3:9 9 Then stood Jeshua with his sons and his brethren, Kadmiel and his sons, the sons of Judah, together, to set forward the workmen in the house of God: the sons of Henadad, with their sons and their brethren the Levites.
Nehemiah 3:24 24 After him repaired Binnui the son of Henadad another piece,
Nehemiah 9:1-5 Now in the twenty and fourth day of this month the children of Israel were assembled with fasting,….
4 Then stood up upon the stairs, of the Levites, Jeshua, and Bani, Kadmiel, Shebaniah, Bunni, Sherebiah, Bani, and Chenani, and cried with a loud voice unto YHWH their God.
5 Then the Levites, Jeshua, and Kadmiel, Bani, Hashabniah, Sherebiah, Hodijah, Shebaniah, and Pethahiah, said, Stand up and bless YHWH your God for ever and ever: and blessed be thy glorious name, which is exalted above all blessing and praise.
Nehemiah 10:1-13 Now those that sealed were, Nehemiah,…
… 9 And the Levites: both Jeshua the son of Azaniah, Binnui of the sons of Henadad, Kadmiel; (excerpted)
Nehemiah 12:1-8 Now these are the priests and the Levites that went up with Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and Jeshua:..
…Moreover the Levites: Jeshua, Binnui, Kadmiel, Sherebiah, Judah, and Mattaniah, which was over the thanksgiving, he and his brethren. (excerpted)
Nehemiah 12:24-25 24 And the chief of the Levites: Hashabiah, Sherebiah, and Jeshua the son of Kadmiel, with their brethren over against them, to praise and to give thanks, according to the commandment of David the man of God, ward over against ward.
Now it is pretty obvious, unless you are really trying not to see it, that these are not papponymic relationships but real first and second generation Levites who worked, prayed and gave thanks together from the 1st year of Cyrus until at least the 20th year of the Persian king the Bible identifies as “Artaxerxes”. For clarity I repeat if this “Artaxerxes” of Ezra and Nehemiah be Darius I then these passages give an incredibly congruent picture of the temple rebuilding efforts, its dedication, the building of the wall, and resumption of Torah observance.
If the Artaxerxes mentioned is the Persian king Longimanus then we are left with a hopeless chronological muddle which undermines the credibility of the Bible.
Chief of Thanksgiving in the Days of Jeshua
But let’s drill down a bit to see if there is any other supporting passages which might shed light on this chronology. In Nehemiah 12 a Levite named Mattaniah is identified who was “over the thanksgiving”. In modern terms you might call him a worship leader. This Mattaniah is identified as one of the Levites who officiated during the days of Jeshua, the high priest.
Nehemiah 12:8 8 Moreover the Levites: Jeshua, Binnui, Kadmiel, Sherebiah, Judah, and Mattaniah, which was over the thanksgiving,…
After the wall was completed in the 21st year of “Artaxerxes” Nehemiah asked the children of Israel to cast lots in order that they might find inhabitants to dwell in the newly fortified city of Jerusalem. One of the men mentioned was Mattaniah who was the “principal to begin the thanksgiving in prayer”. Further this Mattaniah Neh. 11:22 tells us had a son named Hashabiah who we find in Nehemiah 12:24 as one of the chief Levites whose job it was to “praise and give thanks” and who the text identifies as a contemporary of Joiakim (son of Jeshua, the high priest).
This provides confirming evidence that the Mattaniah of Cyrus’ and Jeshua’s day was the same Mattaniah who was present in Jerusalem at the dedication of the wall when the city was resettled and who’s son’s were also a contemporaries of Joiakim. In no reasonable way could these events have taken place in the 21st year of “Artaxerxes” Longimanus
Nehemiah 11:15-17 15 Also of the Levites:….
17 And Mattaniah the son of Micha, the son of Zabdi, the son of Asaph, was the principal to begin the thanksgiving in prayer:
Nehemiah 11:22 The overseer also of the Levites at Jerusalem was Uzzi the son of Bani, the son of Hashabiah, the son of Mattaniah, the son of Micha. Of the sons of Asaph, the singers were over the business of the house of God.
Nehemiah 12:24 24 And the chief of the Levites: Hashabiah, Sherebiah, and Jeshua the son of Kadmiel, with their brethren over against them, to praise and to give thanks, according to the commandment of David the man of God, ward over against ward.
A Chronological Reading of Nehemiah 12
The above evidence is further confirmed with a chronological reading of Nehemiah 12. I challenge you to see for yourself in the following passage I’ve arranged the verses as they were given but in a way to emphasize their natural relationship to each other. Please note that Nehemiah 12:1-7 gives a list of the “chief of the priests” in the days of Jeshua, the high priest. This is followed by a listing of the “Levites” during the days of Jeshua. This list is arranged first by priest and then Levites.
Important Key to Understanding these Passages:
Please note that the distinction made between priests and Levites is one of the ways the author of Nehemiah helps the reader understand specifically who he is talking about. When you arrange these priests and Levites of Nehemiah chapters 7 -12 according to these designations, it removes much of the confusion as to who is meant and how each name is related to each other, especially when some of the priests or Levites share the same name.
Following this list of Levites in verses 8-9, Neh. 12:10-11 establishes the lineage of Jeshua and his sons so that there is no confusion about the chronological context he is describing and that which follows. In other words he links chronologically these priests and Levites with Jeshua the high priest and then shows the reader how these men are chronologically related to Jeshua’s descendants.
After this summary of the lineage of the high priests, the author in verses 12-21 then provides a list of priests who officiated during the high priesthood of Joiakim, son of Jeshua. To further emphasize the first and second generation relationship, most of the chief priests who were contemporaries of Jeshua (verses 1-7) are listed again along with the name of their offspring and the text then identifies these offspring as contemporaries of Joiakim the son of Jeshua the high priest.
Verses 22-23 once again provide an overview of the high priesthood lineage, only this time it synchronizes this lineage with Darius the Persian.
Verses 24-25 provide a list of some of the Levites who officiated during the days of Joiakim. (Thus balancing the list of priests and Levites who served during the days of Jeshua the high priest with a similar list of priests and Levites who served during the days of Jeshua son, Joiakim. In other words this passage presents the priests and Levites during the days of Jeshua and then priests and Levites during the days of Joiakim.
Finally verse 26 removes all doubt about the chronological relationship between the priest and Levites listed during the priesthood of Jeshua and Joiakim. It concludes:
26 These were in the days of Joiakim the son of Jeshua, the son of Jozadak, and in the days of Nehemiah the governor, and of Ezra the priest, the scribe.
As you will be able to see for yourself below, this passage in its most natural and plain sense reading proves that the priests and Levites in the days of Joiakim were contemporaries with Nehemiah’s governorship and Ezra’s service as priest and scribe.
Here is the Nehemiah 12 with verse numbers:
Nehemiah 12:1-26
1 Now these are the priests and the Levites that went up with Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and Jeshua:
Seraiah, Jeremiah, Ezra, 2 Amariah, Malluch, Hattush, 3 Shechaniah, Rehum, Meremoth, 4 Iddo, Ginnetho, Abijah, 5 Miamin, Maadiah, Bilgah, 6 Shemaiah, and Joiarib, Jedaiah, 7 Sallu, Amok, Hilkiah, Jedaiah.
These were the chief of the priests and of their brethren in the days of Jeshua.
8 Moreover the Levites:
Jeshua, Binnui, Kadmiel, Sherebiah, Judah, and Mattaniah, which was over the thanksgiving, he and his brethren. 9 Also Bakbukiah and Unni, their brethren, were over against them in the watches.
10 And Jeshua begat Joiakim, Joiakim also begat Eliashib, and Eliashib begat Joiada, 11 And Joiada begat Jonathan, and Jonathan begat Jaddua.
12 And in the days of Joiakim were priests, the chief of the fathers:
of Seraiah, Meraiah;
of Jeremiah, Hananiah;
of Ezra, Meshullam
of Amariah, Jehohanan;
of Melicu, Jonathan;
of Shebaniah, Joseph
of Harim, Adna
of Meraioth, Helkai
of Iddo, Zechariah
of Ginnethon, Meshullam
of Abijah, Zichri
of Miniamin
of Moadiah, Piltai
of Bilgah, Shammua
of Shemaiah, Jehonathan
of Joiarib, Mattenai
of Jedaiah, Uzzi
of Sallai, Kallai
of Amok, Eber
of Hilkiah, Hashabiah
of Jedaiah, Nethaneel.
22 The Levites in the days of Eliashib, Joiada, and Johanan, and Jaddua, were recorded chief of the fathers: also the priests, to the reign of Darius the Persian. 23 The sons of Levi, the chief of the fathers, were written in the book of the chronicles, even until the days of Johanan the son of Eliashib.
24 And the chief of the Levites:
Hashabiah, Sherebiah, and Jeshua the son of Kadmiel, with their brethren over against them, to praise and to give thanks, according to the commandment of David the man of God, ward over against ward.
25 Mattaniah, and Bakbukiah, Obadiah, Meshullam, Talmon, Akkub, were porters keeping the ward at the thresholds of the gates.
26 These were in the days of Joiakim the son of Jeshua, the son of Jozadak, and in the days of Nehemiah the governor, and of Ezra the priest, the scribe.
As you can see from reading this passage in its most natural sense, the 1st and 2nd generational relationship of the priests and Levites is emphasized by the author. In this passage there are only room for two generations from the decree of Cyrus and Joshua and Zerubbabel’s return until the events described in the book of Ezra and Nehemiah.
This 1st and 2nd generational relationship is further confirmed when the priests and Levites of Nehemiah 12 are compared to the priests and Levites of Nehemiah 10 who were present when the wall was completed under the direction of Nehemiah in the 20-21st year of the Persian king “Artaxerxes”. As you’ll see demonstrated in the chart below the same priests and Levites are listed and for the most part they are even listed in the same order as given in Nehemiah 12.
In other words, these lists demonstrate that many of the priests and Levites who came up with Joshua and Zerubbabel in 536 BC (Neh. 12) were still alive and active when the wall was completed and dedicated in the 20-21st year of a Persian “Artaxerxes”.
To try and break this 1st and 2nd generational connection undermines the specific chronology and detailed account and throws the entire books of Ezra and Nehemiah into chronological confusion.
Please see the chart at the bottom of this page for a complete visual representation of the priest and Levites of Nehemiah 12 relative to priests and Levites of Nehemiah 7, 8, 9, and 10.
Zechariah the Trumpeter
An additional piece of evidence that puts the nail into the coffin of the Pappanymy Assumption is the lineage of a trumpeter named Zechariah. In Nehemiah 12:35 it tells us that Zechariah was one of the priests who played music upon the wall when it was dedicated in the 20-21st year of Artaxerxes.
Nehemiah 12:35 35 And certain of the priests’ sons with trumpets; namely, Zechariah the son of Jonathan, the son of Shemaiah, the son of Mattaniah, the son of Michaiah, the son of Zaccur, the son of Asaph:
What is so cool about this lineage is that this passage identifies Zechariah as a priest and the son and grandson of Jonathan and Shemaiah respectively. If we then turn to Nehemiah 12:12-18 we find that Shemaiah’s son Jonathan listed as contemporaries of Joiakim. Proceeding back in time we find that Nehemiah 12:18 lists Shemaiah as one of the original priests who came up with Joshua and Zerubbabel in the 1st year of Cyrus (536 BC).
Because Nehemiah 12:35 provides a continuous lineage from Zechariah to Shemaiah it provides reasonable if not conclusive proof that priests listed in Nehemiah 12 were first and second generation contemporaries of Joshua and Zerubbabel. Because these same priests and Levites are given in Nehemiah 10 and elsewhere as real live contemporaries of Ezra and Nehemiah we must accept that the “Artaxerxes” of Ezra and Nehemiah could not have been Artaxerxes Longimanus but must have been the Persian king Darius I ‘The Great’ whom the Bible identifies by the title of Artaxerxes decades before that Medo-Persian administrative title was taken as a throne name by his grandson Longimanus.
Nehemiah 10 and the Sealing of Israel
For those of you who really love to search these things out I challenge you to read the chronological history of Nehemiah 8-10 & 12 and see if you can identify the priests and Levites who took part in those momentous events. For your convenience in the chart below I’ve color coded the names of the priests and Levites found in those chapters. With the information I’ve provided you in this article I sincerely believe you’ll find that there is no other reasonable option but to see the events of Ezra and Nehemiah and the priests and Levites who partook in those events as contemporaries of the Persian king Darius. Rather than an uncertain chronological muddle proposed by Mr. Lanser and many of our peers on account of their Papponymy Assumption, instead we have straight forward chronological generational statements that prove the Bible to be a reliable account of real history.
As you pursue the chart below keep in mind that the priests and Levites of Nehemiah 12 are those who came up with Joshua and Zerubbabel in the 1st year of Cyrus (536 BC). The priest and Levites of Nehemiah 8, 9, 10, and 11 are those who the Bible specifically tells us were contemporaries of Joshua’s son Joiakim (the high priest), Nehemiah (the governor), and Ezra (the priest and scribe).
Click on Image to Enlarge
Ezra the Priest and Scribe
This brings us to the history of Ezra, the priest and scribe. Our exploration of this subject wouldn’t be complete unless including this man who was one of the most pivotal people of that era.
Let’s start by looking at the lineage of Ezra. Ezra 7 opens with Ezra’s lineage as a “son of Seraiah”. Here take a look:
Now after these things, in the reign of Artaxerxes king of Persia, Ezra the son of Seraiah, the son of Azariah, the son of Hilkiah,… (Ezra 7:1)
Again according to our interpretive method, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise we must assume the most plain sense ordinary reading of the text. Such a reading of this text unequivocally indicates that Seraiah was Ezra’s father. Not everyone agrees with such a plain reading of the text. This is not how Mr. Lanser sees the text. I quote from his article The Seraiah Assumption:
Genealogical Lists Can be Incomplete
However, it is essential to realize that genealogies in Scripture often do not include every name in a family tree. Names of certain individuals are sometimes left out when their mention does not further the writer’s purpose. The possibility of missing ancestors is demonstrated in Ezra 7, where we are presented with this genealogy:
1Now after these things, in the reign of Artaxerxes king of Persia, there went up Ezra son of Seraiah, son of Azariah, son of Hilkiah, 2son of Shallum, son of Zadok, son of Ahitub, 3son of Amariah, son of Azariah, son of Meraioth…
A superficial comparison of 1 Chronicles 6:14–15 with Ezra 7:1 might lead some to think Ezra was one of the exiles taken to Babylon in 587 BC, but this does not take the full picture into account. By focusing on “Ezra son of Seraiah, son of Azariah” in Ezra 7:1 to claim the existence of an Artaxerxes Assumption, another assumption is being made: that Seraiah ben- (“son of”) Azariah was the literal father of Ezra. This assumption is not nearly as firmly grounded as the English translation may make it seem, for the Hebrew prefix ben– (which the KJV archaically renders “begat”) encompasses not only direct father-son relationships but also ancestor-descendant relationships, where some intervening names between two significant people are left unmentioned.
It is true that generational lists don’t always include every generation in a family tree. As Ezra’s own genealogy demonstrates he did leave out several generations in the middle of his lineage when compared to 1 Chron. 6:3-25. This omission though does not provide any grounds to assume that there were also names missing between Ezra and his father Seraiah.
If we allow ourselves to take such liberties with the text without contextual support then all lists would then be fair game to insert additional generations as we arbitrarily deem necessary to adjust Biblical history to meet our own criteria. Quite frankly such an approach undermines the credibility of the Scripture. Ezra was a scribe, that means he was well versed in the Torah. If he left names out in the middle of his lineage he could have simply done so for brevities sake. To use this omission as some sort of spring board to assume further missing name between his lineage and his father Seraiah is simply unsupported speculation, necessitated by a desire to stretch the chronology of the 2nd temple era.
The reason Mr. Lanser needs to seen missing generations between Seraiah and Ezra is because Ezra’s father Seraiah was the last high priest of Solomon’s temple and he was killed in Babylon in the 19th year of Nebuchadnezzar (2 Kings 25:18-20). By no reasonable interpretive method can Mr. Lanser’s chronology justify Ezra as the son of Seraiah in its most natural sense because taking this passage in its most plain sense would make Ezra over 140 years old by the time 21st year of the Persian king Longimanus.
The following chart shows the age of Ezra relative to the Persian kings Darius and Longimanus. Without inserting arbitrary generations in the lineage of Ezra this chart shows why Ezra and “Artaxerxes” Longimanus could in no reasonable way be considered contemporaries.
Interestingly, one might argue that Ezra may have returned to Jerusalem with Zerubbabel for a short period of time. In Nehemiah 12:1 a priest by the name of Ezra did in fact return to Jerusalem. The text does not tell us who this Ezra was, but we cannot say definitively that it was not our Ezra the priest and scribe. And lest you think it unusual to find Ezra back in Persia by the 6th year of Darius, consider that the Scriptures tells us Nehemiah, as an officer of the king, traveled back and forth between Jerusalem and Shushan in Persia. If we are going to speculate here, we could assume a high likelihood that there was much traffic between the Jewish community in Judah and those still in Persia, including those Hebrew men who were officiating on king Darius Artaxerxes’ behalf.
Now these are the priests and the Levites that went up with Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and Jeshua: Seraiah, Jeremiah, Ezra, Amariah, Malluch,… Nehemiah 12:1-2
Ezra In the Historical Records
Ezra really is important to fixing the chronology of the 2nd temple period. In this article I’ve given you several reasonable pieces of Biblical evidence that show Ezra was a contemporary of Darius “Artaxerxes”. Now let me give you several historical references which also indicate Ezra was the literal son of Seraiah just as the Bible describes. These sources are not scriptural, but represent Jewish oral and written traditions as well as two references from the apocryphal books of Esdras. At the very least these references show that Ezra’s contemporaneous relationship to Darius “Artaxerxes” was well understood by the Jewish people.
-
- Daniel now received the Divine charge to urge Cyrus to rebuild the Temple. To this end he was to introduce Ezra and Zerubbabel to the king. Ezra then went from place to place and called upon the people to return to Palestine. Sad to say, only a tribe and a half obeyed his summons. Indeed, the majority of the people were so wroth against Ezra that they sought to slay him. He escaped the peril to his life only by a Divine miracle. (LOUIS GINZBERG. THE LEGENDS OF THE JEWS VOL. I – IV (Kindle Locations 18416-18420). Kindle Edition.)
- The complete resettlement of Palestine took place under the direction of Ezra, or, as the Scriptures sometimes call him, Malachi. He had not been present at the earlier attempts to restore the sanctuary, because he could not leave his old teacher Baruch, who was too advanced in years to venture upon the difficult journey to the Holy Land. …. (LOUIS GINZBERG. THE LEGENDS OF THE JEWS VOL. I – IV (Kindle Locations 18523-18530). Kindle Edition.)
- … for it is written [Ezra, vi. 15]: “And this house was finished on the third day of the month Adar, which was in the sixth year of the reign of Darius the King.” And we have learned in a Boraitha: At the same time in the following year Ezra and the children of the captivity went up from Babylon, and the Bible says about this [Ezra, vii. 8]:(The Babylonian Talmud Kindle Edition)
- The second book of the prophet Esdras, the son of Saraias….which was captive in the land of the Medes, in the reign of Artexerxes king of the Persians.(4 Esdras 1:1-3)
- In the thirtieth year after the ruin of the city I was in Babylon [554 BC], and lay troubled upon my bed, and my thoughts came up over my heart:(4 Esdras 3:1)
- Jewish Encyclopedia —– The Babylonian captivity lasted seventy years. Ezra sanctified Palestine in the seventh year of the second entrance, after the sixth year of Darius, when the Temple was dedicated (Ezra vi. 15, 16; vii. 7). The first cycle of shemiṭṭah began with the sanctification of Ezra. The Second Temple stood 420 years, and was destroyed, like the First, in the 421st year, on the closing of the shemiṭṭah (‘Ar. 13a).
In this article I’ve given you several vectors of contextual Biblical evidence which all show that Ezra was the son of Seraiah and that he was a contemporary of Darius Artaxerxes. This evidence combined with what we’ve learned about the 1st and 2nd generational relationship of the priests and Levites of Nehemiah 10 & 12 provides compelling evidence that the events described in the book of Ezra and Nehemiah took place during the reign of Darius I ‘The Great’ Persian king whom the Bible also identifies as “Artaxerxes” decades before that title was taken as a throne name by Darius’ grandson Longimanus.
The Sanballat Double Standard
There is one last aspect of Mr. Lanser’s Seraiah Assumption that I believe needs to be addressed because it illustrates the lengths to which so many decent scholars are willing to go to find evidence for their belief that the “Artaxerxes” of Ezra and Nehemiah was the Persian king Longimanus.
As you read the following passage keep in mind that Mr. Lanser and many of his peers when reading the names of the priests and Levites of Nehemiah 10 and 12 cannot accept that these men are 1st and 2nd generations because some of the priests and Levites have the same name (the papponymy assumption).
Yet when it comes to the Bible’s mention of Sanballat the Horonite in Nehemiah 2, Biblical scholarship lauds this Sanballat as the very same Sanballat the governor of Samaria because he is mentioned in the Elephantine Papyri dated to the 407 BC. This despite the fact that at no point does the Bible tell us that Sanballat the Horonite was the governor of Samaria, despite the fact that Sanballat was a very common name in the 2nd temple era, and despite the fact that historians to this day have no real clarity as to how many Sanballat governors of Samaria there actually were. Mr. Lanser explains it this way:
Sanballat in the Elephantine Papyri
Lastly, I would point out the mention of Sanballat, the local leader Nehemiah contended with, in Elephantine papyri that place him alive in 407 BC. As described at https://theosophical.wordpress.com/2011/09/07/biblical-archaeology-31-the-elephantine-papyri/:
One letter is of particular note. The “Petition to Bagoas” is a letter written by Yedaniah bar-Gemariah on November 25, 407 BC (the 17th year of King Darius) to Bagoas, the Persian governor of Judea, asking for assistance in the rebuilding of a Jewish temple in Elephantine that had been damaged by Egyptian priests in the community. On the reverse side at the very end it mentions another letter that had been sent to the sons of Sanballat, governor of Samaria:
“We have also set forth the whole matter in a letter in our name to Delaiah and Shelemiah, the sons of Sanballat, the governor of Samaria. Furthermore, Arsames (the Persian satrap) knew nothing of all that was perpetrated on us. On the twentieth of Marheshwan, the seventeenth year of Darius the King.”
The precise dating of this letter, in the seventeenth year of the reign of Darius II Nothus who succeeded Artaxerxes I Longimanus, together with the explicit naming of Sanballat alongside his two sons who were old enough to be the primary recipients of a second official letter, should make it clear that Nehemiah’s arrival in Jerusalem must be placed in the twentieth year of an “Artaxerxes” compatible with that date. Only Artaxerxes I Longimanus meets the dating requirements; placing Nehemiah’s arrival in the twentieth year of Darius I (502/501 BC) is far too early for Sanballat to have been a middle-aged man at that time. When I pointed this out to Mr. Struse in a private email, he replied:
The fact that a Sanballat was mentioned in the Elephantine papyri is not proof that this was the Sanballat of Nehemiah’s day. In fact Sanballat was a very common name especially during the reigns of Nebuchadnezzar and Darius. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia has this to say about Sanballat:
Sanballat is the Babylonian Sin-uballit, “may Sin give him life,” a name occurring a number of times in the contract tablets from the time of Nebuchadnezzar, Nabonidus, and Darius Hystaspis. (See Tallquist, Neubabylonisches Namenbuch, 183) (emphasis added by Struse).
The problem here is that Mr. Struse has jumped to a conclusion that overlooks a key point made by Robert Dick Wilson in the aforementioned ISBE article, online at https://biblehub.com/topical/s/sanballat.htm. It is this: the Sanballat in question was clearly not only a governor of Samaria, he was also the father of two sons named Delaiah and Shelemiah. These are men who were rulers of the Samaritans and are known from the Elephantine papyri to have lived in the late fifth century BC. These further identifiers make this Sanballat a very specific person that stands out from any others who may have borne that name, and only this particular Sanballat matters to us. Certainly, the name may have been found at other times and in other contexts, just like the multiple examples of papponymy given in the previous article. But how many of them were governors who also fathered sons named Delaiah and Shelemiah?
Summarizing the Sanballat Double Standard
To put this Sanballat double standard a bit more bluntly, it claims that we can’t accept Nehemiah 10 and 12 as straight forward accounts of chronological history because some of the priests and Levites have the same names and this somehow proves, without any deference to the context, that those names must have been used papponymically. Yet we must accept that “Sanballat the Horonite” mentioned in the Bible is the very same “Sanballat the governor” of Samaria of the Elephantine Papyri because these two individuals have the same name.
In Conclusion
I hope this series of articles has helped you wrap your mind around the chronology of the 2nd temple era. I also hope that I’ve illustrated the dangers of making assumptions that the Bible cannot be taken at face value in its most natural and reasonable sense. So much confusion has been introduced into the subject because scholars have looked passed the most natural reading of the text and made unwarranted assumptions. The Biblical account really is straight forward. Only when the reader steps outside a chronological reading of the text and imposes a so called “thematic” or other arbitrary framework around the text do the books of Ezra and Nehemiah become a hopelessly confusing chronological mess.
It is my belief that a straight forward and chronological reading of the texts of Nehemiah and Ezra provides the clearest and most compelling understanding of these books and it shows just how accurate the Biblical record is when it describes the history of the 2nd temple era.
If you’ve followed these series of articles closely then some of you realize the real root cause of the chronological confusion surrounding the 2nd temple era is a well meaning but misguided attempt to stretch the chronology of the 2nd temple era so that most interpretations of the prophecy of Daniel 9 find their fulfillment in Yeshua of Nazareth. That is the only reason compelling enough for scholars to turn a blind eye towards a contextual and plain sense reading of the history described in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah.
But this need not be the case. The chronology of the 2nd temple era can be read in a straight forward and plain sense way without sacrificing the credibility of the prophecy of 70 Sevens and its fulfillment in Yeshua. I’ve demonstrated this in multiple articles at this blog and in my book Daniel’s 70 Seven: The Keystone of Bible Prophecy. Those of you who take your stewardship of Yahweh’s wonderful word seriously I encourage you to do your own due diligence and “see if these things be so.”
Maranatha!
Articles related to this series:
The Seraiah Assumption by Rick Lanser of Associates for Biblical Research
The Seraiah Assumption: Wrapping up Loose Ends by Rick Lanser
My response to Rick Lansers – The Seraiah Assumption:
Introduction – The Associates for Biblical Research Responds to the Artaxerxes Assumption
Part I – Cyrus to Darius: The 2nd Temple Context of Ezra 4
Part II – Darius & Artaxerxes: The Context of the Word to Restore & Build Jerusalem
Part III – Darius the great Persian Artaxerxes: A Contextual Look at the Book of Ezra in the Light of Persian History
Part IV – Darius and the Kingdom of Arta
Part V – Darius, Artaxerxes, & the Bible: Confirming Royal Persian Titulature
Part VI – Mordecai & the Chronological Context of Esther
Part VII – Esther, Ahasuerus, & Artaxerxes: Who was the Persian King of 127 Provinces?
Part VIII – Darius I: A Gentile King at the Crux of Jewish Messianic History
Part IX – The Priests & Levites of Nehemiah 10 & 12: Exploring the Papponymy Assumption
Darius I: A Gentile King at the Crux of Jewish Messianic History
My last several articles have looked at the Persian king Darius and his important role in the return and restoration of the Jewish people to their land. This effort by Darius also included moral and financial support in rebuilding the temple, reestablishment of the temple service, and most importantly (I believe), the restoration of Torah observance.
The last seven articles have been a book’s worth of Biblical and historical details spread out over a period of months. So in this article I’ll attempt to summarize the important highlights of the information so that you’ll will be able have the big picture of how Yahweh, the living God of the Bible, used a the Persian king Darius to prepare the way of the coming of Israel’s (and the world’s) promised Redeemer. If these highlights challenge or intrigue you then I encourage you to read the underlying articles which show the Biblical foundations for my arguments.
In response to The Seraiah Assumption by Rick Lanser, which was a critical review of my work on the 2nd temple era as posted on the Associates for Biblical Research website, I started this series of articles with the premise that the Bible is a trustworthy and accurate account of history. As the Biblical history has unfolded in these articles we’ve seen in fact that taking the Biblical account in its most natural and plain sense provides us with a clearer picture of Biblical history and its chronology than if we try to rearrange the Bible’s chronology using a thematic approach as proposed by Rick Lanser.
In the following paragraphs let me show you just how incredibly important Darius I was in Jewish history. And so that you will have the clearest context of the events described, I will giving them in the same chronological order as they appear in the Biblical record. As a sort of prologue we will start with Cyrus and his decree which allowed the Jewish people to return and build the temple and Jerusalem.
Keep in mind here that in this series of articles I provided evidence to show that the Biblical authors of Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther used the Medo-Persian administrative titles of Ahasuerus and Artaxerxes to describe the Persian king Darius I (and others) long before those titles were take as throne names by his descendants in the decades that followed.
As I’ve demonstrated in these article and others over the years, Old Testament Biblical history in terms of an Bible chronology ends here in the reign of Darius I ‘The Great’, the only thing connecting the next five centuries of Biblical history to the coming of the Messiah Yeshua (Jesus) and the New Testament record of Yeshua’s birth, death, and resurrection is the prophecy of Daniel 9 and its 70 Sevens. Daniel 9 and its 70 Seven prophecy is the bridge that connects the Old Testament and New Testament,. In essences it is the cord that binds them into a congruent and complete chronological whole.
Why is This Even Important?
The reason I’ve spent so much time going over the chronology of the 2nd temple era in this series and over the years at this blog is because the Bible is a congruent whole with specific redemptive message to share with mankind. That message is Yahweh’s atoning love through His Yeshua – His Salvation worked out through Biblical history according to His preordained calendar as measured in what we understand as time – past, present, and future. When we misidentify chronological fixing points Yahweh has recorded for us in the Bible, these errors can’t help but influence the interpretational matrix of how we understand what happened at Yeshua’s first coming as well as what Yahweh’s word predicts about what will take place at Yeshua’s return.
Think about the implications of an inaccurate understanding of Biblical history as it relates to Daniel 9 and the prophecy of 70 Sevens. Because the vast majority of evangelical Biblical scholars of the past and present believe that chronology of Ezra is a jumbled up mess that cannot be taken in a straightforward and chronological manner, they place the start of 70 Seven’s countdown to the Messiah nearly 60 years later in Biblical history than is chronologically justifiable by a plain reading of the text. Having done this, their view of Biblical history then influences how they understand what that prophecy says about the Messiah and the purpose of his first coming. Then upon that weak foundation they make conclusions about what the Bible says about the Messiah Yeshua’s second coming.
Instead of an amazingly congruent prophecy which primarily speaks to the covenantal and redemptive nature of Yahweh’s redemptive plan for all mankind at Yeshua’s first coming, the 70 Sevens becomes a dispensational hybrid prophecy in which its covenantal and redemptive message for all mankind (the 69 Sevens = 98.6% of the prophecy) is left hanging and instead the focus shifts to the Anti-Christ and a final period of the 7 year tribulation (1.4%) in which Yahweh’s wrath towards the Jewish people reaches is fateful climax.
Chronological Errors Have Theological Significance
Let me give you a few examples of what has happened to most evangelical interpretations of the prophecy of 70 Sevens because Biblical chronologists have erroneously reconstructed the chronology of the 2nd temple era as it relates to Ezra, Nehemiah, Darius, and “Artaxerxes”.
- Instead of the most congruent and wonderful testimony of Yahweh’s redemptive love for the Jewish people and all mankind through the promised Messiah, the messianic redemptive nature of the prophecy of 70 Sevens ends with the death of Yeshua and then shifts to the work of the Anti-Christ. (The resurrection is missing in most interpretations.)
- Instead of a covenantal fulfillment of the oath (shebuw’ah) Yahweh swore (shaba) with Abraham, that “covenant and mercy” held up by Daniel in his prayer to Yahweh, (Dan 9:4)), the covenant of the prophecy of 70 (Shib’iym) Sevens (Shabuwa) is stripped of its context and becomes a covenant with the Anti-Christ.
- Instead of providing the covenantal template by which the Jewish people can fully realize their promised restoration to the land sworn (shaba) by Yahweh in the an oath (shebuw’ah) made with Abraham, (that template which shows that the Jewish peoples temporal fortunes come only after their spiritual fortunes are restored through faith in Yeshua), the prophecy of 70 Sevens becomes a dark ugly thing which tells the Jewish people only of the Messiah’s death without the resurrection (after 69 Sevens), then tells of 7 years of punishment, and tells of yet another unknown period of desolation without hope. (And we wonder why Jewish anti-missionaries are so resistant to evangelical interpretations of Daniel 9)
- Instead of confirming the multiple New Testament witnesses which tell us that Yeshua, by His death and resurrection, confirmed (strengthen) the oath (shebuw’ah) Yahweh swore (shaba) with Abraham, the messianic covenantal nature of the prophecy of 70 Sevens is transformed into a covenant made with the Anti-Messiah.
Today the vast majority of my evangelical peers tell us the prophecy of Daniel 9 and its 70 Sevens is a prophecy given by Yahweh to the Jewish people. With this I agree because it is through the Jewish people that a Jewish Messiah came and through the Jewish people (the seed of Abraham) that we received prophetic record which tells of Yahweh’s wonderful redemptive plan for all of us.
With this wonderful messianic covenantal heritage, I for the life of me cannot understand why we then disassociate this prophecy with its covenantal messianic roots in the oath (Shebuw’ah) swore (shaba) with Abraham, an oath that Moses described as the “covenant and mercy” made with the “fathers” Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. I cannot understand how my evangelical peers then further deconstruct this wonderful covenant and mercy made with Abraham, that oath (shebuw’ah) which tells of the coming Yeshua Messiah and instead turn the prophecy and its promised covenantal restoration (spiritual & physical) through the Messiah into the darkest chapter in Jewish history.
Deuteronomy 7:9 Know therefore that YHWH thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations;
Deuteronomy 7:12 12 Wherefore it shall come to pass, if ye hearken to these judgments, and keep, and do them, that YHWH thy God shall keep unto thee the covenant and the mercy which he sware [shaba] unto thy fathers:
Galatians 3:16-17 16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. 17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
Genesis 22:16-18 16 And said, By myself have I sworn, saith YHWH, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son: 17 That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;
18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice.
Luke 1:68-73 68 Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people, 69 And hath raised up an horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David; 70 As he spake by the mouth of his holy prophets, which have been since the world began: 71 That we should be saved from our enemies, and from the hand of all that hate us; 72 To perform the mercy promised to our fathers, and to remember his holy covenant; 73 The oath [shebuw’ah] which he sware[shaba] to our father Abraham,
Acts 3:25-26 25 Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed. 26 Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.
Daniel 9:4 4 And I prayed unto the LORD my God, and made my confession, and said, O Lord, the great and dreadful God, keeping the covenant and mercy to them that love him, and to them that keep his commandments;
Shame on us!
I know many of you that read this blog long for the return of Yeshua as I do. I have sobering news for you though. Yeshua unequivocally told His Jewish brethren that He will not return again until they (the Jewish people) acknowledge him as their promised Messiah.
Luke 13:34-35 34 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee; how often would I have gathered thy children together, as a hen doth gather her brood under her wings, and ye would not! 35 Behold, your house is left unto you desolate: and verily I say unto you, Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.
Daniel 9:27 27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
I believe now is the time to remove the chronological stumbling block we have placed upon the Bible’s single most important Messianic prophecy given specifically to the Jewish people, a stumbling block that undermines its clearly OT covenantal and messianic context, a context that proves that Yeshua is the fulfillment (or if you prefer a confirmation) of the oath (shebuw’ah) that Yahweh swore (shaba) with Abraham.
The Covenant and Messianic congruency of Daniel 9 and the 70 Sevens can only be properly understood if it is placed in the chronological context given by Yahweh as recorded in Bible. That is the reason I’ve spent so much time showing you why the 2nd temple context of the Bible is the crux of Biblical Messianic history as it relates to the Jewish people and the prophecy of 70 Sevens.
Please don’t take my word for it. Do your own Berean duty and see if these things be so.
With that being said, here is the summary of the chronology we’ve explored to date as it relates to Ezra, Nehemiah, Darius, and “Artaxerxes” place in the 2nd temple era. Yahweh willing, in my final article in this series I’ll show you why accepting the lineage of the priests and Levites as recorded in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah in its most natural and plain sense reading provides us with further evidence that the reign of Darius I ‘The Great’ is truly and accurately described as the crux of Jewish Messianic history as it relates to the Daniel 9, the Bible’s greatest Messianic prophecy.
536 BC
Cyrus Decrees that the Jewish People can Return to Building Jerusalem
At the end of the 70 years captivity prophesied by Jeremiah, Yahweh raised up Cyrus of Persia to allow the Jewish people to return and build Jerusalem. This return was lead by Joshua, the high priest, and Zerubbabel, the governor.
21 To fulfil the word of the YHWH by the mouth of Jeremiah, until the land had enjoyed her sabbaths: for as long as she lay desolate she kept sabbath, to fulfil threescore and ten years. 22 Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of the YHWH spoken by the mouth of Jeremiah might be accomplished, the YHWH stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom, and put it also in writing, saying, 23 Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, All the kingdoms of the earth hath the YHWH God of heaven given me; and he hath charged me to build him an house in Jerusalem, which is in Judah. Who is there among you of all his people? The YHWH his God be with him, and let him go up. 2 Chronicles 36:21
536 BC
Mordecai Returns to Jerusalem
After Cyrus’ decree that allowed the Jewish people to return and rebuild Jerusalem, this repatriation was lead by Joshua, the high priest, and Zerubbabel, the governor. Amongst those who lead this return was a man named Mordecai. For further explanation as to why this is important to the subject of Darius and Artaxerxes please see my article Mordecai and the Chronological Context of Esther.
Now these are the children of the province that went up out of the captivity, of those which had been carried away, whom Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon had carried away unto Babylon, and came again unto Jerusalem and Judah, every one unto his city; 2 Which came with Zerubbabel: Jeshua, Nehemiah, Seraiah, Reelaiah, Mordecai, Bilshan, Mispar, Bigvai, Rehum, Baanah. Ezra 2:1-2
522-521 BC
Darius I Squelches the Lobbying Efforts of the Jewish People’s Enemies
Today much is written about king Cyrus of Persia and his decree which allowed the Jewish people to return and build the temple of Jerusalem. What is often left unsaid is that after Cyrus’s decree and the Jewish people’s return, they were only able to lay some of the temple foundation stones before their construction efforts on Yahweh’s house were interrupted.
4 Then the people of the land weakened the hands of the people of Judah, and troubled them in building, 5 And hired counsellors against them, to frustrate their purpose, all the days of Cyrus king of Persia, even until the reign of Darius king of Persia. Ezra 4:4-5
For the next roughly 16 years any serious effort to rebuild Yahweh’s sanctuary were interrupted and instead the Jewish people worked on their own dwellings. After Cyrus died and his son Cambyses (a.k.a. the Ahasuerus of Ezra 4:6) took the throne, the enemies of the Jewish people sent lobbyists to the Persian court to ensure that any reconstruction efforts of the Jewish people were blocked. These efforts by the Jewish people’s enemies seemed to have fallen on a deaf ear by the Persian king Cambyses.
After Cambyses a new Persian king identified in the Bible as “Artaxerxes” (a.k.a. Bardis the Magian Usurper) took the throne and the lobbying efforts of the Jewish people’s enemies found a willing ear in this new Persian king’s court. “Artaxerxes” countermanded the original decree by Cyrus of Persia and by force of arms the enemies of the Jewish people stopped the meager efforts of the Jewish people to rebuild Yahweh’s house. According to Persian history written by Darius I on the granite cliffs of Behistun, the Usurper’s reign only lasted a short time before he was deposed by Darius I (son of Hystaspes).
Shimshai the Scribe
One of those lobbyists who tried to thwart the Jewish people’s reconstruction efforts the Bible identifies as Shimshai the Scribe. Intriguingly, there is a tablet from the reign of Cambyses which names such an individual. This provides intriguing confirmation that the events of Ezra 4 are contemporaneous with the era of Cambyses and Darius I. For more on this see my article: Darius, Artaxerxes, & the Bible: Confirming Royal Persian Titulature
520 BC – Yahweh and the Divine Command to Restore and Build
Then in 520 BC when the divine clock in Yahweh’s redemptive plan struck a preordained hour, He personally reached down into the affairs of mankind and commanded that the Jewish people “return” and build His desolate sanctuary.
Zechariah 1:16
Therefore thus saith YHWH; I am returned to Jerusalem with mercies: my house shall be built in it, saith YHWH of hosts, and a line shall be stretched forth upon Jerusalem.
3 Then came the word of the YHWH by Haggai the prophet, saying, 4 Is it time for you, O ye, to dwell in your cieled houses, and this house lie waste? 5 Now therefore thus saith the YHWH of hosts;….
Haggai 1:3-9
Thus saith the YHWH of hosts; Consider your ways. 8 Go up to the mountain, and bring wood, and build the house; and I will take pleasure in it, and I will be glorified, saith the YHWH. 9 Ye looked for much, and, lo, it came to little; and when ye brought it home, I did blow upon it. Why? saith the YHWH of hosts. Because of mine house that is waste, and ye run every man unto his own house.
Ezra 6:14
14 And the elders of the Jews builded, and they prospered through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo. And they builded, and finished it, according to the commandment of the God of Israel, and according to the commandment of Cyrus, and Darius, and [even] Artaxerxes king of Persia.
Remember the Messianic Context!
Keep the big picture in mind here. In order for the Messiah to come and fulfill the many prophecies written about Him, Yahweh’s house had to be restored. That is the reason Satan used the enemies of the Jewish people to block the reconstruction of the temple. No temple – no Messiah, no Torah observance – no Messiah.
Related articles:
Cyrus to Darius: The 2nd Temple Context of Ezra 4
Darius & Artaxerxes: The Context of the Word to Restore & Build Jerusalem
Darius, Artaxerxes, & the Bible: Confirming Royal Persian Titulature
(521 BC)- Darius I – Helps Restores the Jewish Temple
After Yahweh’s divine command to restore and build Jerusalem, the enemies of the Jews approached king Darius in his 2nd year of reign (521 BC) to stop the Jewish people’s divinely mandated construction efforts. Darius had no sympathy for their cause of obstruction. In fact, as we know from Persian history that Darius favored the restoration of the religious institutions and their service of the people in his kingdom. This is what Darius told the enemies of the Jewish people:
Ezra 6:6-7, 11
6 Now therefore, Tatnai, governor beyond the river, Shetharboznai, and your companions the Apharsachites, which are beyond the river, be ye far from thence: 7 Let the work of this house of God alone; let the governor of the Jews and the elders of the Jews build this house of God in his place….
11 Also I have made a decree, that whosoever shall alter this word, let timber be pulled down from his house, and being set up, let him be hanged thereon; and let his house be made a dunghill for this.
Ezra 6:13-15
13 Then Tatnai, governor on this side the river, Shetharboznai, and their companions, according to that which Darius the king had sent, so they did speedily.
14 And the elders of the Jews builded, and they prospered through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo. And they builded, and finished it, according to the commandment of the God of Israel, and according to the commandment of Cyrus, and Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia.
15 And this house was finished on the third day of the month Adar, which was in the sixth year of the reign of Darius the king.
Related articles:
Cyrus to Darius: The 2nd Temple Context of Ezra 4
Darius & Artaxerxes: The Context of the Word to Restore & Build Jerusalem
521 BC & 515 BC – Darius the “Huckster” supports the Temple Service
One of those unusual statements of history that has stuck to Darius I was the appellation of “huckster” that Herodotus bestowed upon him. This term was given to Darius I because he was the Persian king who instituted a commodities based form of tribute in lieu of Gold and Silver. This historical fact is confirmed in the Bible when Darius I gave the Jewish people (in days of Joshua and Zerubbabel) from the king’s treasury in support of the temple service. This interesting historical fact is further confirmed when “Artaxerxes” a.k.a. Darius also gave to Nehemiah in support of the same:
Ezra 6:8-10
8 Moreover I make a decree what ye shall do to the elders of these Jews for the building of this house of God: that of the king’s goods, even of the tribute beyond the river, forthwith expenses be given unto these men, that they be not hindered.
9 And that which they have need of, both young bullocks, and rams, and lambs, for the burnt offerings of the God of heaven, wheat, salt, wine, and oil, according to the appointment of the priests which are at Jerusalem, let it be given them day by day without fail: 10 That they may offer sacrifices of sweet savours unto the God of heaven, and pray for the life of the king, and of his sons.
Ezra 7:21-23
21 And I, even I Artaxerxes the king, do make a decree to all the treasurers which are beyond the river, that whatsoever Ezra the priest, the scribe of the law of the God of heaven, shall require of you, it be done speedily, 22 Unto an hundred talents of silver, and to an hundred measures of wheat, and to an hundred baths of wine, and to an hundred baths of oil, and salt without prescribing how much. 23 Whatsoever is commanded by the God of heaven, let it be diligently done for the house of the God of heaven: for why should there be wrath against the realm of the king and his sons?
519 BC
Darius Holds Court for Officials of his 127 Provinces
By the 2rd year of his reign Darius had put down the rebellions in his kingdom and consolidated his power. According to the Persian records and historians of that day only Darius I could rightly be distinguished as the Persian Ahasuerus who ruled over “127 provinces”. It was he who achieved this distinction. While Darius’ son Xerxes did indeed inherit the full extent of Darius’ kingdom, by his 7th year he had lost part of the kingdom and no longer could he rightly be distinguished as such as is described in the book of Esther in the 13th year of “Ahasuerus”. Further, only Darius could rightly be said to have “laid tribute upon the land and the isles of the sea” as described in the book of Esther.
This evidence suggest then that in his 3rd year it was Darius, also known in the book of Esther by the title Ahasuerus, that held a grand banquet for the rulers of his 127 provinces. The following Biblical and historical sources confirm this:
Ester (Greek) 16:1
The great king Artexerxes unto the princes and governors of an hundred and seven and twenty provinces from India unto Ethiopia, and unto all our faithful subjects, greeting.
KJA 1 Esdras 3:1
Now when Darius reigned, he made a great feast unto all his subjects, and unto all his household, and unto all the princes of Media and Persia, 2 And to all the governors and captains and lieutenants that were under him, from India unto Ethiopia, of an hundred twenty and seven provinces.
KJV Esther 1:1
Now it came to pass in the days of Ahasuerus, (this is Ahasuerus which reigned, from India even unto Ethiopia, over an hundred and seven and twenty provinces:)
516 BC – The Temple Completed in the 6th year of Darius I
Ezra 6:14-15
14 And the elders of the Jews builded, and they prospered through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo. And they builded, and finished it, according to the commandment of the God of Israel, and according to the commandment of Cyrus, and Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia.
15 And this house was finished on the third day of the month Adar, which was in the sixth year of the reign of Darius the king.
515 BC – Darius I Commands the Restoration of Torah Observance
From historical sources we know that Darius I, who the Bible also identifies by the title “Artaxerxes” had a passion for restoring the laws and religious practices of the people he ruled. This is evidenced in the Bible in his 7th year when he granted Ezra the legislative and judicial power to institute Torah observance.
Ezra 7:25-26
25 And thou, Ezra, after the wisdom of thy God, that is in thine hand, set magistrates and judges, which may judge all the people that are beyond the river, all such as know the laws of thy God; and teach ye them that know them not. 26 And whosoever will not do the law of thy God, and the law of the king, let judgment be executed speedily upon him, whether it be unto death, or to banishment, or to confiscation of goods, or to imprisonment.
Encyclopedia Britannica – Darius as An Administrator
While measures were thus taken to unite the diverse peoples of the empire by a uniform administration, Darius followed the example of Cyrus in respecting native religious institutions. In Egypt he assumed an Egyptian titulary and gave active support to the cult. He built a temple to the god Amon in the Kharga oasis, endowed the temple at Edfu, and carried out restoration work in other sanctuaries. He empowered the Egyptians to reestablish the medical school of the temple of Sais, and he ordered his satrap to codify the Egyptian laws in consultation with the native priests. In the Egyptian traditions he was considered as one of the great lawgivers and benefactors of the country. In 519 bc he authorized the Jews to rebuild the Temple at Jerusalem, in accordance with the earlier decree of Cyrus.
Darius’ Behistun Inscription
(Column 2 – 14) King Darius says: The kingdom that had been wrested from our line I brought back and I reestablished it on its foundation. The temples which Gaumâta, the Magian, had destroyed, I restored to the people, and the pasture lands, and the herds and the dwelling places, and the houses which Gaumâta, the Magian, had taken away. I settled the people in their place, the people of Persia, and Media, and the other provinces. I restored that which had been taken away, as is was in the days of old. This did I by the grace of Ahuramazda, I labored until I had established our dynasty in its place, as in the days of old; I labored, by the grace of Ahuramazda, so that Gaumâta, the Magian, did not dispossess our house.
515 BC
Esther Becomes the Queen of Persia
Towards the end of his third year of reign (519 BC)Ahasuerus requested Queen Vashti to present herself at the banquet which he held for the rulers of his 127 provinces. After Vashti refused king Ahasuerus’ (Darius I) asked the advice of his 7 “wise men” as to what her punishment should be.
Four years later in Darius’ 7th year (a.k.a. Darius even “Artaxerxes”) we find these 7 wise men as part of the royal benefactors who send Ezra to Judah and Jerusalem along with those other willing Judeans who wanted to return.
Esther 1:13-15
Then the king said to the wise men, which knew the times, (for so was the king’s manner toward all that knew law and judgment: 14 And the next unto him was Carshena, Shethar, Admatha, Tarshish, Meres, Marsena, and Memucan, the seven princes of Persia and Media, which saw the king’s face, and which sat the first in the kingdom;) 15 What shall we do unto the queen Vashti according to law, because she hath not performed the commandment of the king Ahasuerus by the chamberlains?
Ezra 7:12-14
12 Artaxerxes, king of kings, unto Ezra the priest, a scribe of the law of the God of heaven, perfect peace, and at such a time. 13 I make a decree, that all they of the people of Israel, and of his priests and Levites, in my realm, which are minded of their own freewill to go up to Jerusalem, go with thee. 14 Forasmuch as thou art sent of the king, and of his seven counsellors, to enquire concerning Judah and Jerusalem, according to the law of thy God which is in thine hand;
It is in this same 7th year of Darius (Esther’s Ahasuerus & Ezra’s Darius “even” Artaxerxes) that Esther became the Queen of 127 provinces.
510 BC
Haman Sets Out to Destroy the Jewish People
In the 12th year of Darius, a man named Haman lays plans to kill the Jews in the kingdom of Persia. After casting Pur (lots) for nearly a year in an effort to determine the best day to exterminate the Jewish people, Haman was given permission to fulfill his evil machinations. It was that infamous day, on the 13th month after casting his first pur (lot), on the 13th day of the month in the 13th year of king Darius that the evil plan was set. Esther intervened and what was intended to be the day which ended the Jewish race instead became one of their greatest deliverances.
In one of the great ironies of the Bible, what the evil Haman had intended for Mordecai and the Jewish people, instead fell upon him and his family. After Haman’s death in the 13th year of Darius, Mordecai became a VIP in the kingdom of Persia. Four years later we find this confirmed in the Persian historical record where a man named Mordecai (Marduka) appears in the cuneiform tables. See the follow article for more details Mordecai & the Chronological Context of Esther.
505-490 BC
Mordecai the Persian Administrator
According to Persian cuneiform tables a man named Mordecai (Marduka) was a high official in Persian government from the 17th to the 32nd year of Darius I.
501-490 BC
Nehemiah Becomes Governor of Jerusalem
Roughly 4 years after we have the first evidence of Mordecai in the Persian records we learn from the Biblical record that Nehemiah was granted the governorship of Jerusalem from the 20th/21st year to the 32nd year of king Artaxerxes. It is fascinating to note that Nehemiah brings to his readers attention that at his audience with the king of Persia “the Queen” was sitting beside him.
Also worth noting, both Nehemiah and the Mordecai of the Persian cuneiform records seem to end their respective administrations in the 32nd year of Darius I.
Nehemiah 5:14
14 Moreover from the time that I was appointed to be their governor in the land of Judah, from the twentieth year even unto the two and thirtieth year of Artaxerxes the king, that is, twelve years, I and my brethren have not eaten the bread of the governor.
Nehemiah 2:6
6 And the king said unto me, (the queen also sitting by him,) For how long shall thy journey be? and when wilt thou return? So it pleased the king to send me; and I set him a time.
Did Mordecai and Esther leave traces in the Neo-Babylonian documents? The name “Mordecai (Mar-duk-ka)” is relatively rare; it is sometimes found during the reigns of Nebuchadnezzar and Nabonidus32, unlike the name “Marduk”, typically Babylonian (always written dAMAR.UTU “calf-sun”, originally pronounced amarutuk)33, which was widely used. For example, a contract dated 16/XI/8 of Nebuchadnezzar (February 596 BCE) reads34:
Adi’ilu, son of Nabu-zer-iddina, and Ḫuliti, his wife (the divine Ḫulitum) have sold Marduka, their son, for the price agreed upon, to Šula, son of Zer-ukin. The liability to defeasor and pre-emptor, which is upon Marduka, Adi’ilu and Addaku respond for.
Among the cuneiform sources dating to the period of the Neo-Babylonian empire, of which 16,000 have been published35, there are only 2 individuals bearing the name Marduka: an entrepreneur36 who did business under Nabonidus until the year 5 of Cyrus (534 BCE), and a administrative superintendent37 who worked under Darius I from his years 17 to 32 (505-490 BCE), exactly the same period as Mordecai worked38. (Queen Esther wife of Xerxes Chronological, Historical and Archaeological Evidence by Gerard Gertoux p. 13-14)
Summary
In order to ensure the fulfillment of His redemptive plan for mankind, Yahweh, the living God of the Bible, rose up the Persian king Darius I, who in his 2nd year (520 BC) gave moral, legal, and material support for the reestablishment of Yahweh’s desolate sanctuary. By Darius’s 6th year (516 BC) the temple was completed. The following year (515 BC) Darius sent Ezra to Jerusalem with a mandate to reestablish Torah observance and the authority to adjudicate its observance. That same year (515 BC) Esther (Haddasah) became the Queen of Persia. In the 13th year Haman and his coconspirators were destroyed and Mordecai became an important administrator in the Persian empire. In the 20/21st year of Darius, Nehemiah was appointed governor and the walls of Jerusalem had been restored. By the 32nd year of Darius both Mordecai and Nehemiah’s administrations for the king of Persia seem to come to an end.
This Temple and the Torah observance encouraged by Darius I lasted for nearly 5 centuries until the coming of the promised Messiah Yeshua. After Yeshua’s death and resurrection, the temple and its sacrificial service only lasted for 40 more years.
It was here then, in the reign of Darius I of Persia that Yahweh, the living God of the Bible brought together various threads of His divine redemptive plan and set in motion His countdown to the Messiah Yeshua. That countdown, begun in the 2nd year of Darius with Yahweh’s divine command, and that divine countdown bridged nearly 5 centuries of divine silence and precisely on time (515 years later) brought forth the Messiah Yeshua.
Maranatha!
Articles related to this series:
The Seraiah Assumption by Rick Lanser of Associates for Biblical Research
The Seraiah Assumption: Wrapping up Loose Ends by Rick Lanser
My response to Rick Lanser’s – The Seraiah Assumption:
Introduction – The Associates for Biblical Research Responds to the Artaxerxes Assumption
Part I – Cyrus to Darius: The 2nd Temple Context of Ezra 4
Part II – Darius & Artaxerxes: The Context of the Word to Restore & Build Jerusalem
Part III – Darius the great Persian Artaxerxes: A Contextual Look at the Book of Ezra in the Light of Persian History
Part IV – Darius and the Kingdom of Arta
Part V – Darius, Artaxerxes, & the Bible: Confirming Royal Persian Titulature
Part VI – Mordecai & the Chronological Context of Esther
Part VII – Esther, Ahasuerus, & Artaxerxes: Who was the Persian King of 127 Provinces?
Part VIII – Darius I: A Gentile King at the Crux of Jewish Messianic History
Part IX – The Priests & Levites of Nehemiah 10 & 12: Exploring the Papponymy Assumption
A favor to ask.
If you are a regular reader of this blog, you know that you can download all of my books and articles free of charge. I don’t ask for donations or allow advertisements on this blog. This effort is a labor of love for me as a testimony to Yahweh’s wonderful redemptive plan for mankind through Yeshua. I don’t want your money but if you would take a moment to share the articles you read on this blog with your friends and family on Facebook, Twitter, and other social media I would greatly appreciate your help. Together we can share the Biblical evidence for Yahweh’s wonderful redemptive plan for mankind. Thank you for your help in this effort!
* * *
FREE Book Download:
If you would like to learn more about Biblical history and Bible prophecy, you might also appreciate my books in the Prophecies and Patterns series.
At the following link you may download one of the three books shown below. If you like the book and would like to download the other two, all I ask is that you subscribe to my blog. I won’t share your email or spam you with advertisements or other requests. Just every couple of weeks I’ll share with you my love of Biblical history and Bible Prophecy. Should you decide you no longer wish to be a subscriber you can unsubscribe at any time.
Click the following link to download your Free book: Book Download
I hope you’ll join the adventure!
The Exodus & Reed Sea Crossing: Symbols of the Bible’s Redemptive Message
To my Jewish, Messianic, and Christian brethren who remember Yeshua’s death and resurrection in the Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread, I wish you a blessed and meaningful week. And to my Christian brethren who celebrate Easter in remembrance of Yeshua, I also wish you blessed and meaningful celebration.
This week, I’d like to share with you why all of us who remember Yeshua’s death and resurrection during this time of year find common grounds in the Messianic symbolism of the Exodus story. What is awesome about this subject is that we serve a living God who choose the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as a special people, whose lives and history would be living testimony to Yahweh’s redemptive plan for mankind, through Yeshua (Jesus). This living witness to Yahweh’s redemptive plan is no place better demonstrated than in the story of Israel’s Exodus from Egypt. It is this story that provides the template upon which Jewish, Messianic, and Christian believers find common ground upon which to view the living God of the Bible at work redeeming His people, in the past, present, and future.
So today I want to tell you about the Spirit of Prophecy, I want to tell you about Yahweh’s Salvation (His Yeshua) and how He is so awesomely and beautifully symbolized in the Exodus story.
In the New Testament we learn that Yeshua was understood by the early church to be represented in Passover as the “lamb of God which taketh away the sins of the world”. Thankfully the story of our redemption didn’t end with the death of Yeshua. It was His miraculous resurrection that made His death relevant as the means to our salvation.
I’ve spent the last couple of months looking at the Exodus story as it relates to the Reed Sea crossing and the location of Mount Sinai. With this foundation in Biblical history let me ask you a question. If the killing of the Passover lambs represented Yeshua’s death and mankind’s atonement for sin, then what part of the Exodus story do you believe represents the resurrection? For those who might not be sure, here are a few verses which provide us with the answer:
Our fathers understood not thy wonders in Egypt; they remembered not the multitude of thy mercies; but provoked him at the sea, even at the Red sea. Nevertheless he saved them for his name’s sake, that he might make his mighty power to be known. He rebuked the Red sea also, and it was dried up: so he led them through the depths, as through the wilderness. And he saved them from the hand of him that hated them, and redeemed them from the hand of the enemy. (Psalm 106:7-10)
Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people, And hath raised up an horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David; As he spake by the mouth of his holy prophets, which have been since the world began: That we should be saved from our enemies, and from the hand of all that hate us; To perform the mercy promised to our fathers, and to remember his holy covenant; The oath which he sware [Shaba] to our father Abraham, (Luke 1:68-73)
But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. (Romans 5:8-9)
Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ. (1 Corinthians 10:1-4)
Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection: (Romans 6:3-5)
They forgat God their savior [yasha], which had done great things in Egypt; Wondrous works in the land of Ham, and terrible things by the Red sea. (Psalm 106:21-22)
But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared, Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour. (Titus 3:4-6)
Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead. (Colossians 2:12)
Pretty compelling, isn’t it? Israel’s redemption, yeah their salvation was wrought through the waters of the Reed Sea crossing. As evidenced in the New Testament passages above that symbol of salvation and redemption was the prophetic template upon which Yeshua’s resurrection was themed. In the Old Testament those events were immortalized in the Biblical holy days of Passover, Feast of Unleavened Bread, and Firstfruits. We’ll explore some of the wonderful threads of these prophetic shadows and types of the Exodus and the Reed Sea crossing in more detail below but I have another question for you related to the location of Reed Sea crossing.
If Passover sacrifices represent Yeshua’s death for the sins of mankind in the Exodus events’ chronology and the Reed Sea crossing represents the resurrection, rebirth, and the salvation of mankind, then why are those events separated by 3-4 weeks in the Aqaba crossing theory? In other words, if we are to believe the Reed Sea crossing took place in the Gulf of Aqaba such an itinerary inadvertently separates the messianic redemptive symbolism of the Exodus events from the Feast of Unleavened Bread, the very Biblical mow’ed (divine appointment) given to represent mankind’s restoration and redemption. How is this possible?
I don’t believe it is possible. As I will demonstrate in the rest of this article, the congruency of the Bible’s messianic symbolism makes the Aqaba theory untenable for reasons besides those I’ve explored in my articles the last several weeks. The most compelling reason (as it relates to our faith in Yeshua and Yahweh’s redemptive plan), is described by the apostle Paul to the Corinthians:
For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:… (1 Corinthians 15:3-4)
Now if Christ be preached that he rose from the dead, how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not risen: And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain. Yea, and we are found false witnesses of God; because we have testified of God that he raised up Christ: whom he raised not up, if so be that the dead rise not….. (1 Corinthians 15:12-15)
But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept. For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming. (1 Corinthians 15:20-23)
Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead? (1 Corinthians 15:29)
Pretty powerful and sobering words, aren’t they? You see by taking the Reed Sea crossing out of the Passover week we in effect make the Feast of Unleavened Bread and Firstfruits, the Bible’s premier symbols of Yahweh’s redemptive plan, worthless and vain. If we try to claim this 7 day feast, this divine mow’ed, is prophetic picture of the Messiah, according to Paul’s judgment, we are bearing false witness. Without the Reed Sea crossing, the Exodus is only a symbol of death and thus irrelevant to the Bible’s overall redemptive message.
Today, I want to reassure you regarding the congruency of the Bible’s redemptive message. I want to give you new confidence that in fact the Passover, the Feast of Unleavened Bread, and Firstfriuts are one of the most important, if not the most important, of the Bible’s prophetic pictures of Yahweh’s redemptive plan for mankind through His Yeshua.
As we explore this important subject I want to stress that my goal here is to strengthen your faith in the credibility of the Bible’s redemptive message. That message is that Yahweh loves each of you and from the foundation of the world he set in motion a redemptive plan for all of us which is beautifully and a congruently witnessed in the collection of 66 books we know today as the Bible.
The Water of Judgment and Redemption
To start off with, let’s look at the symbolism of water in the Bible. As we will see it is a powerful agent, both literally and metaphorically, in Yahweh’s redemptive plan. First let me take you to the book of Job, one of the oldest books in the Bible where we find a fascinating description of water and its regenerative nature in what could be argued is a messianic redemptive context:
For there is hope of a tree, if it be cut down, that it will sprout again, and that the tender branch thereof will not cease. Though the root thereof wax old in the earth, and the stock thereof die in the ground; Yet through the scent of water it will bud, and bring forth boughs like a plant. But man dieth, and wasteth away: yea, man giveth up the ghost, and where is he?
As the waters fail from the sea, and the flood decayeth and drieth up: So man lieth down, and riseth not: till the heavens be no more, they shall not awake, nor be raised out of their sleep. O that thou wouldest hide me in the grave, that thou wouldest keep me secret, until thy wrath be past, that thou wouldest appoint me a set time, and remember me! If a man die, shall he live again? all the days of my appointed time will I wait, till my change come. Thou shalt call, and I will answer thee: thou wilt have a desire to the work of thine hands. For now thou numberest my steps: dost thou not watch over my sin? My transgression is sealed up in a bag, and thou sewest up mine iniquity. (Job 14:7-17)
Behold, God is my salvation; I will trust, and not be afraid: for the YA – YHWH is my strength and my song; he also is become my salvation. Therefore with joy shall ye draw water out of the wells of salvation. (Isaiah 12:2-3)
Mankind’s 911 Moment
Water is not just used in a regenerative and life giving sense as described by the passage in Job. Sometimes, like in Genesis 9, water is used as a form of judgment and deliverance.
And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed after you; And with every living creature that is with you, of the fowl, of the cattle, and of every beast of the earth with you; from all that go out of the ark, to every beast of the earth. And I will establish my covenant with you; neither shall all flesh be cut off [karath] any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth. (Genesis 9:9-11)
Here is Genesis 9:11 we find the first occurrence of the Hebrew word karath (to cut or cut off) used to describe the destruction of mankind by the waters of the flood. It is here, where we also find that Yahweh makes a covenant with Noah and his “seed” for all their generations. This covenant promised that Yahweh would never again destroy all mankind with a flood of water. The token of this covenant was the rainbow.
So in this instance we see water used as an agent of judgment and redemption (deliverance). For those with the faith of Noah and his family, water was the means of their deliverance. For those without faith the water condemned them to death.
The apostle Peter describes the redemptive nature of water in the days of Noah and relates it to the redemptive and regenerative symbolism of baptism and the resurrection of Yeshua. Carefully notice in this passage that the “figure” of baptism is directly related to the “resurrection” of Christ.
For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison; 20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water. The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ: (1 Peter 3:18-21)
What powerful symbolism!
Daniel 9 & the Covenant and Mercy of Yahweh
To further elucidate the wonderful symbolism of water and the symbolic relationship to Yahweh’s redemptive plan, let’s turn to the most important messianic prophecy in the Bible found in Daniel chapter 9. In Daniel is recorded the only prophetic passage in the Bible which tells us specifically when Yahweh’s redeemer would come to save mankind from their sins. As I’ve explained in my article Seven, 70, & Sevens: Daniel 9 & the Bible’s Messianic Symbolism and in my book Daniel’s 70 Weeks: The Keystone of Bible Prophecy, Daniel 9 opens with Daniel’s plea to Yahweh to remember His “covenant and mercy”. That covenant we learned was in fact a call for Yahweh to remember the oath he sware (shaba) with Abraham which promised through his “seed” all nations of the earth would be blessed. As Daniel 9 unfolds Yahweh goes on to reveal to Daniel when that promised Seed would come and the redemptive nature of the messiah’s mission:
Seventy weeks [sevens] are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to:
-
- finish the transgression
- and to make an end of sins
- and to make reconciliation for iniquity
- and to bring in everlasting righteousness
- and to seal up the vision and prophecy
- and to anoint the most Holy.
Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment [dabar-word] to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks [sevens/70], … (Daniel 9:24-25)
It’s in Daniel 9:26 though that we find a connection to the flood of Noah and redemptive purpose of Yahweh. Here take a look:
And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off [karath], but not for himself: (Daniel 9:26)
After telling us when the Messiah would come and what He would accomplish, Daniel 9:26 tells us that the Messiah would be karath “cut off” but not for himself. To a reader steeped in the Hebrew Scriptures the use of karath here in Daniel 9:26 might naturally lead one to think of destruction of mankind by their being karath (cut off) by the waters of the flood. Notice in Daniel 9:26 it implies that the Messiah was cut off but not for himself. (He made reconciliation for the sins of others). Contrast that with the days of Noah where mankind was indeed karath (cut off) for their own sins.
But there is an even more thrilling connection between the waters of Noah’s flood and the deliverance of mankind. You see the ark rested and mankind (Noah and his family) was delivered from the waters of the flood on 17th day of the 1st month. As I’ve explained in my articles The Story of Halloween and Part II of that series The Flood, the Exodus of Israel, and the Coming of the Messiah, a reasonable case can be made that 17th day of the 7th month of the calendar used in Noah’s day would have equated to the 17th day of the 1st month of the post Exodus calendar. (In Noah’s day the calendar year began in the fall.)
In other words mankind’s deliverance from Yahweh’s judgment (by the waters of the flood) took place during the same week and month of the year (possibly the very same day of the week) that Israel crossed the Reed Sea as well as the same week and month that Yeshua of Nazareth died for our sins and then rose again from the grave. How is that for a congruent Biblical redemptive theme!
The Waters of Baptism
Let’s dig into the subject of baptism and its redemptive symbolism. In the following passage we see that there is no question that the waters of baptism symbolize the washing away of sin, and the restoration and rebirth of mankind by Yeshua’s death and resurrection. Let’s start by looking at Yeshua’s own words where he talks about his baptism and then the words of Paul were he explains Yeshua’s baptism was a symbol of His death.
But Jesus answered and said, Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with? They say unto him, We are able. And he saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of my cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not mine to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father. (Matthew 20:22-23)
Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection: (Romans 6:3-5)
And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood, (Revelation 1:5)
And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord. (Acts 22:16)
But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. (Romans 5:8-9)
For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison; Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water. The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ: (1 Peter 3:18-21)
And finally let’s complete the picture by once again letting the apostle Paul lead the way as he explains how Israel’s crossing of the Reed Sea was a picture of their baptism accomplished by the leading and power of Christ.
Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ. (1 Corinthians 10:1-4)
Our fathers understood not thy wonders in Egypt; they remembered not the multitude of thy mercies; but provoked him at the sea, even at the Red sea. Nevertheless he saved them for his name’s sake, that he might make his mighty power to be known. He rebuked the Red sea also, and it was dried up: so he led them through the depths, as through the wilderness. And he saved them from the hand of him that hated them, and redeemed them from the hand of the enemy. (Psalm 106:7-10)
This Moses whom they refused, saying, Who made thee a ruler and a judge? the same did God send to be a ruler and a deliverer by the hand of the angel which appeared to him in the bush. He brought them out, after that he had shewed wonders and signs in the land of Egypt, and in the Red sea, and in the wilderness forty years. This is that Moses, which said unto the children of Israel, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear. (Acts 7:35-37)
But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot: Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you, Who by him do believe in God, that raised him up from the dead, and gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God. (1 Peter 1:19-21)
He is not here, but is risen: remember how he spake unto you when he was yet in Galilee, Saying, The Son of man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again. (Luke 24:6-7)
Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils. (Mark 16:9)
The Reed Sea Crossing and the Resurrection
By these (and other) marvelously congruent witnesses we can reasonably claim that Israel’s crossing over the Reed Sea was means by which Yahweh the living God of the Bible saved His people. This “baptism” through the waters of the sea saved Israel and delivered them from Pharaoh’s hatred and their servitude to Egypt. Israel entered the waters of the Reed Sea slaves to Pharaoh and they came out of those waters born again as the servants of the living God of the Bible. The Reed Sea crossing broke the power Pharaoh had over the children of Israel.
The witnesses above also inform us that the Exodus story was a type or shadow which was fulfilled in Yeshua of Nazareth. Yeshua’s death and resurrection were the means by which Yahweh saved mankind from their sins. These verses further explain that baptism is a symbol of Yahweh’s redemptive work at Calvary. Just as the waters of the Reed Sea delivered Israel from the hand of Pharaoh in Egypt, Yeshua’s death and resurrection were the means by which mankind was delivered from the hate of Satan (the god of this world) and certain death wrought by our sins. These pictures are the underlying theme of Yahweh’s redemptive plan for mankind. Let’s now look at that plan in terms of the Bible’s prophetic words.
The Spirit of Prophecy and the Feast of Unleavened Bread
The book of Revelation provides us with an often overlooked key that helps us understand the Bible’s prophetic redemptive message. In Revelation 19:10 it tells us that the “spirit of prophecy is the testimony of Jesus” (Yeshua). As I’ve often repeated at this blog, the Hebrew word for Jesus is Yeshua. Yeshua is a combination of two Hebrew words. The first is the proper name of Yahweh the living God of the Bible and the second part of the name of Yeshua comes from the Hebrew word Yasha (salvation). So when Revelation tells us the “spirit” of prophecy is the testimony of Yeshua, it is literally telling us that the spirit of prophecy is Yahweh’s Salvation.
This spirit of prophecy then is Yahweh’s Salvation (Yeshua) – His redemptive plan for restoring mankind to their intended state. This is the underlying thread which congruently binds the entire prophetic message of the Bible. So any time you have a prophetic passage, you’ll find within that prophecy a thread of Yahweh’s redemptive plan for mankind.
One of the best panoramic summations of Yahweh’s redemptive plan (and one of my favorite) was given by the apostle Peter in Acts 3 after he had healed the lame man in Solomon’s porch in the Temple. Absorb these wonderful words for a moment and I’ll do my best to explain how they relate to the Spirit of Prophecy and the Exodus:
And when Peter saw it, he answered unto the people, Ye men of Israel, why marvel ye at this? or why look ye so earnestly on us, as though by our own power or holiness we had made this man to walk?
13 The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his Son Jesus; whom ye delivered up, and denied him in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to let him go. 14 But ye denied the Holy One and the Just, and desired a murderer to be granted unto you; 15 And killed the Prince of life, whom God hath raised from the dead; whereof we are witnesses.
….But those things, which God before had shewed by the mouth of all his prophets, that Christ should suffer, he hath so fulfilled. 19 Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; 20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you: 21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.
For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you. 23 And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people. 24 Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after, as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days. 25 Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed. 26 Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities. (Acts 3:12-26)
As Peter understood it, Yahweh’s redemptive plan through Yeshua was preached by all the prophets since the world began. This prophet Yeshua, (likened unto Moses), was also the fulfillment of Yahweh’s shaba (oath) – His oath of sevens – which he swore with Abraham that through his “seed” all nations of the earth would be blessed . Peter further explains it was through the resurrection of Yeshua from the grave that Yahweh blessed Israel by turning them from their iniquities. (For more on the wonderful congruency of Yahweh’s redemptive plan (His Oath of Sevens), Daniel 9 & the Bible’s messianic symbolism please see my article Seven, 70, & Sevens: Daniel 9 and the Bible’s Messianic Symbolism.)
[DISPLAY_ULTIMATE_PLUS]
The Spirit of Prophecy in Yahweh’s Mow’ed
As Peter explained above, Yahweh’s redemptive plan for mankind was spoken about by all His prophets since the world began. Chief among those prophets was Moses and some of the most vivid prophetic pictures of Yahweh’s redemptive plan for mankind are found in the 7 Biblical holy days Yahweh gave to Moses for the children of Israel to keep. These Biblical holy days, or as the Bible describes them Feasts of Yahweh (also Mow’ed or divine appointments), became the template which Yeshua has fulfilled in the past (the spring holy days) and will fulfill in the future (the fall holy days). The chart below gives an overview.
What’s special about the spring holy days and the count to Shavuot (Pentecost) is that they commemorate real Biblical history. Not only did they commemorate real history but they were so important, Yahweh ordered Israel to keep these feast days throughout all their generations and further He re-organized the Biblical calendar to being in the month these spring commemorations commence. With these instructions Israel became the custodian of Yahweh’s redemptive picture for mankind. A few verses illustrate this:
This is that Moses, which said unto the children of Israel, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear. This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us: (Acts 7:37-38)
What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? 2 Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God. (Romans 3:1-2)
Think about the amazing congruency of these redemptive pictures, these oracles that the Jewish people safeguarded for us:
- In the days of Noah mankind was judged by Yahweh with the waters of the flood. Only eight souls were delivered from this judgment by Yahweh sealing them in the ark. Noah’s family was delivered from the waters when the ark rested on 17th day of the 7th month. In terms of the post Exodus calendar this equated to the 17th day of the first Biblical month.
- In the days of Moses, Israel was delivered from the hand of Pharaoh and their servitude to Egypt when they passed through the Reed Sea. Taken in its most reasonable and plain sense reading of the text, Israel left Egypt the morning of the 15th day of the 1st month. Their journey to the Reed Sea took two or possibly three days which then dates their passage through the Reed Sea to the morning of the 17th or 18th day of the first Biblical month.
- In the days of Yeshua, He and His disciples ate the Passover (as required by the law) at even on the 14th of Nisan which began the 15th day of the 1st month. Two or three days later (depending on your view of the chronology) Yeshua rose from the grave on the 1st day of the week which would have been the 17th or 18th day of the 1st Biblical month.
- According to the law given to Moses, Israel was commanded to begin their countdown to Shavuot (Pentecost) on the 1st day of the week following the Sabbath day which fell within the Feast of Unleavened Bread. The apostle Paul makes it clear that He saw Yeshua as a type of this Firstfruits harvest.
But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept. For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. 22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming. (1 Corinthians 15:20-23)
- Israel entered the wilderness of Sin on the 15th day of the 2nd month. The following day Yahweh provided manna for Israel to eat. Based upon the chronology provided in the text of Exodus, this made the 16th day of the 2nd month the 1st day of the week. If we run this chronology backwards to the Exodus of Israel from Egypt we find that the 1st day of the week (within the Feast of Unleavened Bread) fell on the 17th day of the first month – the very same day Israel may have crossed the Reed Sea and the very same day 1500 years later that Yeshua rose from the grave.
40 Years in the Wilderness
Let me give you one more example of the Bible’s messianic symbolism that has a fascinating connection to the Reed Sea crossing. After Israel crossed over the Reed Sea, Yahweh caused them to wander in the wilderness for forty years. How accurate do you believe the following verses are?
And your children shall wander in the wilderness forty years, and bear your whoredoms, until your carcases be wasted in the wilderness. After the number of the days in which ye searched the land, even forty days, each day for a year, shall ye bear your iniquities, even forty years, and ye shall know my breach of promise. (Numbers 14:33-34)
Nearly ten years ago I asked myself the same question. I wondered if it was theoretically possible to see if the Bible was speaking in general terms or if it really meant to convey a more specific period of time. You see the Bible tells us that Israel crossed over into the Promised Land on the 10th day of the 1st month at the end of 40 years wandering. We know from the Exodus account that Israel officially entered the wilderness after passing through the Reed Sea.
I used as my working theory the assumption that Israel crossed over the Reed Sea on the 17th day of the 1st month (in keeping with the chronology and symbolism we’ve discussed above). Adding 40 years (14609.6 days) to the starting date of the 17th day of the 1st month resulted in the expiration of the 40 years on the 9th day of the first month. In other words, it appeared based upon my calculations that those 40 years of wandering in the desert ended the day before Israel crossed over the Jordan river into the promised land.
And the people came up out of Jordan on the tenth day of the first month, and encamped in Gilgal, in the east border of Jericho. (Joshua 4:19)
Now I could have miscalculated but if I got the calculations correct it shows that when Yahweh said Israel would wonder in the wilderness for 40 years, He meant exactly 40 years. Think about his in terms of the Aqaba crossing theory. If proponents of the Aqaba theory are correct then the Reed Sea crossing took place at some point in the middle of the 2nd month. By this starting point for the 40 year countdown Israel would not have wondered in the wilderness the full forty years. For those interested in checking my work the following 188 page PDF file shows every day of the 40 years including month and year intercalations.
Passover to the Promised Land – 40 Years
A couple things with noting in the chart:
- Israel camped at the Jordan river on the 7th day of the 1st month – exactly 40 years from the day of the Exodus.
- Israel crossed over the Jordan and entered the Promised Land on the day after their 40 years expired. (This assumes the 17th day of the 1st month of the Exodus was the day Israel crossed the Reed Sea)
(Please note that in the provided chart I stated regarding the 10th day of the 1st month as the day Israel crossed the Jordan — “Israel crossed over the Jordan exactly 40 years to the day from crossing over the Red Sea”. I don’t remember why I worded it that way but it appears that back then my original basis would have been the 18th as the start of the 40 years. In any case it is a bit confusing. I did not have time to modify my original chart to make my statement more clear so I wanted to mention that here in the hopes of avoided any further confusion. In any case please take my calculations with a Berean’s skepticism and do your own due diligence.)
The Messianic Symbolism of the Crossing the Jordan
Now consider the events of the Jordan river crossing in a symbolic sense. Moses, (through whom came the law) was not allowed to enter the Promised Land. That privledge and responsibility was given to Yeshua who Israel had to follow by faith(Joshua = Jesus = Yeshua are all the same name). So this Old Testament Yeshua led Israel through the Jordan river exactly 40 years from the day of the Reed Sea crossing.
When the priest’s feet touched the waters of the Jordan the text tells us those waters back up all the way to Adam which is beside Zaretan. I can’t help see some redemptive symbolism here.
We know from multiple references which I’ve shared in this article that water is used as symbol of redemption, salvation, and judgment. Here in the book of Joshua we have the Old Testament Yeshua (Yahweh’s Salvation) leading Israel into the Promised Land after the waters of the river Jordan (meaning = ‘descender’) backed up to the city Adam (who brought sin into this world) and the city Zaretan (meaning = their distress).
Would it be too far fetch to say here that Israel’s crossing over the Jordan into the Promised Land was a symbol of Yeshua’s death and resurrection which brought cleansing and redemption to mankind after sin and distress entered the world in the days of Adam? Let’s take the symbolism one step further. What did Yahweh commanded Yeshua to do after crossing over the Jordan River? He commanded him circumcised the men of Israel. How appropriate then the words of Paul when taking about how new believers being spiritually circumcised by Yeshua.
In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ: Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead. (Colossians 2:11-12)
And to cap off this symbolism, just a few days later Yeshua and the Children of Israel celebrated their first Passover in the Promised Land. Now how is that for an amazingly congruent picture of Yahweh’s redemptive plan through Yeshua?
Yahweh’s Salvation indeed!
My Final Thoughts on the Exodus and the Reed Sea Crossing
My hope is that the information I’ve shared with you in this article strengthens your faith in the Bible as a testimony of Yahweh’s wonderful redemptive plan through Yeshua. I also hope its spurs your interest in searching these things out for yourself. If you do I believe that you’ll have a renewed appreciation for the Exodus story and it chronology as a compelling and amazingly congruent foreshadowing of Yahweh’s Salvation – Yeshua.
For those of you who believe the Reed Sea crossing took place in the gulf of Aqaba, I hope you’ll take another look at the subject in light of the “spirit of prophecy”. The Passover, the Feast of Unleavened Bread, and the Feast of Firstfruits find their prophetic origins in the Exodus story. Without the symbolism of the Reed Sea crossing these divine appointments lose their redemptive and prophetic context. I hope you’ll consider that the real importance of the Reed Sea crossing and the Mount Sinai is not their geographical location but rather their prophetic context as templates or symbols of Yahweh’s redemptive plan for mankind.
May that context be your guiding light in this matter.
Maranatha!
For those of you just joining us this is an ongoing series exploring the location of Mount Sinai and the Red Sea Crossing. I’d encourage you to first read Part I-III including the comments as they provide valuable context and information related to this subject. The following link will take you to those earlier articles.
Part I – Is Mount Sinai in Saudi Arabia
Part II – The Reed Sea Crossing: Which Gulf of the Red Sea?
Part III – Israel’s Crossing of the Reed Sea: The Geographical & Chronological Context
Part IV – Israel’s Crossing of the Reed Sea: Applying the Golden Rule of Bible Interpretation
Part V – The Exodus & Reed Sea Crossing: Symbols of the Bible’s redemptive Message
For Full chart please see the following PDF: Passover to the Promised Land
Israel’s Crossing of the Reed Sea: The Geographical & Chronological Context
Part III – Exploring the Claim that Mount Sinai is in Saudi Arabia
One of the most inspiring aspects of the Exodus account is Israel’s crossing of the Reed Sea (Yam Suph). I think all of us in some manner, when we picture this event, see Moses standing at the edge of a vast body of water, his arms and staff held high, the rushing torrents of the sea splitting from one shore of the Reed Sea to the other, then miraculously the two vast walls of water stand suspended, down the center of this sheer canyon hall the Israelites walked safely to the other side.
(Authors Note: This is an ongoing series exploring the location of Mount Sinai and the Red Sea Crossing. For those just joining the discussion I’d encourage you to read Part I & Part II of this series, it provides important context to this subject. Additionally Joel Richardson author of Mount Sinai in Saudi Arabia: The True Location of Revealed who’s book we have been exploring in this series has graciously taken time to offer his thoughts and corrections to Part I of my article. You’ll find his thoughts in the comment sections, so be sure to check that out as well. Additionally many of you have written in and offered comments, suggestions, and criticisms. I thank you. I’m not ignoring you, I’m trying to work through the backlog comments and emails and I will respond it just may take me awhile. Thank you for your understanding.)
The irony of this picture is that such a vision of events must disregard the plainly stated facts in favor of a poetic version. In essence, we must claim the following passage is not to be taken literally.
And Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and YHWH caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind all that night, and made the sea dry land, and the waters were divided. And the children of Israel went into the midst of the sea upon the dry ground: and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left. (Exodus 14:21-22)
The above passage tells us that an East wind blowing all night caused the Reed Sea to be parted. If you believe as many do, that the Reed Sea crossing took place in the gulf of Aqaba at Nuweiba beach then there is simply no way for the above passage to be taken literally. There is no force of wind on earth strong enough to divide the 10 miles of the Gulf of Aqaba which reaches a depth of just over 2500 feet in the waters off Neweiba.
Keep in mind, that this wind was blowing all night long directly towards the Israelites. We can’t even claim the pillar of smoke and fire protected Israel from the wind, because that pillar was between Israel and the armies of Pharaoh.
The bottom line is, that if we are to believe that the Israelites crossed through the Gulf of Aqaba, we are compelled to disregard a plainly stated version of the events in favor of a poetic version. Is this proper exegesis of the text? I personally don’t think so but let’s explore the events related to the Reed Sea crossing get a clearer picture of what transpired.
Timing the Reed Sea Crossing
In Exodus 14, there are some fascinating clues which provide us with a timeline of events related to the Reed Sea Crossing. With these clues we can get a pretty good idea of what part of the day Israel entered the Reed Sea as well as when the armies of Pharaoh were drowned. This information will go along way to helping us understand the type of obstacle Israel encountered when they crossed the Reed Sea.
First we need to understand a little bit about how the Bible divided the nighttime portion of the 24 hour period of time we call a day. In Biblical times the night was divided into four periods of time (sometimes only three) called “watches”. These so called watches were roughly divided by our modern method of reckoning of time as follows:
- 1st Watch = 6-9 pm (evening watch)
- 2nd Watch = 9-12 pm (midnight watch)
- 3rd Watch = 12-3 am (cock-crow watch)
- 4th Watch = 3-6 am (morning watch)
Exodus 14:21-22 tells us that a “strong east wind” blew all night long. For the sake of this example let’s assume that “all night” meant the wind blew from 6pm (sundown) until 3am or from the evening watch until the cock-crow watch (about 9 hours). Exodus 14:24 tells us that sometime during the “morning watch” the Egyptians had followed the Israelites into the waterless bed of the Reed Sea. Then Exodus 14:27 tells us that when the morning (Hebrew boqer = break of day) appeared, the sea had returned to its normal “strength”.
And the Egyptians pursued, and went in after them to the midst of the sea, even all Pharaoh’s horses, his chariots, and his horsemen. And it came to pass, that in the morning watch YHWH looked unto the host of the Egyptians through the pillar of fire and of the cloud, and troubled the host of the Egyptians, And took off their chariot wheels, that they drave them heavily:…
…and YHWH said unto Moses, Stretch out thine hand over the sea, that the waters may come again upon the Egyptians, upon their chariots, and upon their horsemen. And Moses stretched forth his hand over the sea, and the sea returned to his strength when the morning appeared; and the Egyptians fled against it; and YHWH overthrew the Egyptians in the midst of the sea. (Exodus 14:23 – 27 excerpted)
But the children of Israel walked upon dry land in the midst of the sea; and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left. (Exodus 14:29)
So putting this information in its most natural and reasonable sense, we learn that a east wind blew the Reed Sea back all night until the morning watch. No more than three hours later by the break of day the Reed Sea had returned to its normal level. Within this three hour window of time every man, women, and child of Israel (not to mention all the livestock) had crossed the Sea and Pharaoh’s chariots and horsemen had reached the “midst” of the Reed Sea under heavy duress from Yahweh.
And the Egyptians pursued, and went in after them to the midst of the sea, even all Pharaoh’s horses, his chariots, and his horsemen. And it came to pass, that in the morning watch YHWH looked unto the host of the Egyptians through the pillar of fire and of the cloud, and troubled the host of the Egyptians,… (Exodus 14:23-24)
If Israel’s multitudes (2 million + livestock) crossed the Reed Sea in a column ½ mile wide, in the most optimistic scenario, it would have taken an hour before the last Israelite had even started their journey across the Reed Sea. Under this scenario the crossing (wherever it took place) had to have been accomplished by the Israelites in less than two hours. Further, this means that the Egyptians didn’t enter the Reed Sea until at least the 2nd or 3rd hour of the morning watch.
A Bit of Arizona Grand Canyon Perspective
Many of you have probably visited the Grand Canyon of Arizona at some point in your life. On average the Grand Canyon is 10 miles wide and nearly a mile deep. I am sure that some of you have been in awe of this majestic vista when you viewed it for the first time. Words do not adequately convey its grandeur nor is it a sight easy to forget.
Now picture in your mind a canyon half as deep as the Grand Canyon, but the same distance across and filled with water to its very brim. That’s the gulf of Aqaba at Newibea beach. If you believe that Israel crossed the Gulf of Aqaba at Newibea beach then you must also believe that somehow in two hours or less nearly 2 million people and an enumerable number of livestock crossed this 2500’ deep chasm nearly as wide as the Grand Canyon. To put that in a little bit better perspective, that crossing by Israel would be the same a taking every living soul in Tucson & Phoenix (Arizona’s two largest cities) and getting them across the Grand Canyon (half as deep) in two hours or less. That doesn’t even account for the additional mile of elevation change (2500’ down and 2500’ back up) nor any ravines, canyons, or other obstacles encountered along the way. This explanation demands that we as Bereans suspend disbelief and disregard nearly all the plainly stated chronological facts of the crossing in favor of a version of events which are physically impossible.
I should make clear here, that I have no problem believing in miracles. I believe, Yeshua literally turned water into wine, raised the dead, and walked on water of the Galilean Sea. He did indeed transcend, what we understand to be the natural laws of “nature”. And to be clear, there are many other examples of such occurrences throughout the Bible.
That being said, taking plainly stated reasonable facts from the Biblical account and rendering them into a version of events that requires miracles where natural events were described, in my opinion, undermines the credibility of the Biblical account. Further, it requires us to view those plainly stated facts as errors and replace those erroneous facts with poetic license. Let me give a few examples why literal verses poetic context is so important.
The Walls of Water
I know many believe that only a deep water crossing satisfies the description of the walls of water that constrained the Israelites as they crossed the Reed Sea. But is this view Scriptural or more a product of sensationalism? Let’s explore this subject some. Here is Mr. Richardson’s take on the subject:
The Bible doesn’t allow us to reimagine this event as some otherwise naturally occurring phenomenon that the Lord caused to happen at just the right moment. Those who seek to do so tend to only emphasize the blowing of the “strong east wind,” while minimizing many of the other references found throughout Scripture. Among these descriptions are the references to the high walls of water that formed on either side of the Israelites. As Douglas Stuart, Old Testament professor at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, rightly states:
The text, however, says that the wind actually pushed one part of the sea away from the other part (“drove the sea back . . . the waters were divided,” v. 21) and created a “wall of water on their right and on their left.” The term used for “wall” here, hōmāh, connotes a very large wall—not a small stone wall or retaining wall but always a massively large (usually a city) wall, towering above the Israelites, who marched on dry land with walls of water on either side of them. It is clear from the descriptions given that the sea through which the Israelites walked was deep water, not something shallow. A city-wall sized wall of water on either side of them implies the division of a deep body of water, not merely the drying out of a shallow one or the drying out of wet terrain. Even the use of the term yam (“sea”) here implies the depth of the water. Yam is never used for swamps or mud flats but is used consistently to describe large bodies of water (what we would call either lakes or oceans).Richardson, Joel. Mount Sinai in Arabia: The True Location Revealed (Kindle Locations 342-353). WinePress Media. Kindle Edition.
As we learned in Part II (here) of this study Mr. Stuart as quoted above is incorrect in his claims here about the word Yam. Yam is in fact used to describe the shallow bronze “sea” made for Solomon’s temple. Yam is also used to describe the tongue of the Egyptian Sea (Heroopolictic gulf or gulf of Suez), which in ancient times extended all the way up to the Bitter Lakes region.
Further, Stuart, as quoted above, is wrong on two accounts about homah (chomah), the Hebrew word for “wall”. First of all, the Hebrew word for “wall” as given in Exodus 14 is not “always” used to describe a “massively large (usually a city) wall…” as he stated. In Samuel 25:16 a form of the word is used to describe David’s men as a wall unto men of Nabal. In the Song of Solomon, the same word is used to figuratively describe a young girl.
Secondly, and more to the point, the actual form of the Hebrew word for “wall” as found in the Exodus 14 account is used more often to describe wrath, fury, and indignation (mostly Yahweh’s) than it is used to describe a wall. You see, this form of the word is a bit more nuanced than the English version of the text suggests. The Hebrew word has at least three different meanings, they are: Wall, wrath/fury/indignation, and sun.
Interestingly the different meanings of this word as given in the Hebrew and English version of our Bibles are based upon the vowel pointings or cantilation marks added by the Mesoretes in the Middle Ages. In other words, as the chart below reflects, the Mesoretes added their own interpretational bias to the Hebrew word to provide it with what they thought was the best meaning of the word as given in the context of the Hebrew passage where it was found.
Were the Mesorets correct, when they gave the meaning “wall” to the text in Exodus 14? As a layman, it looks that way to me. But the fact of the matter is, this Hebrew word may well have had deeper richer more nuanced meaning when given in the Exodus account. Here see what you think:
When the Walls Came Crashing Down
In any case, to the Israelites those walls of water (whatever their height) were indeed a deliverance from certain death, but to the Egyptian’s armies those walls of water were nothing less than the instruments of Yahweh’s righteous indignation directed towards the oppressors of His chosen people.
From a practical standpoint the Egyptians could have drowned in less than 8 feet of water. To satisfy the literally meaning of wall here in the text of Exodus 14 does not require 2500′ walls of water.
Anyone who has seen the destructive force of a flashflood or tsunami first-hand knows the chances of surviving such a force coming at you from two directions at the same time, while you are in the “midst” of a sea (whatever its depth), are slim to none . When that East wind stopped pushing the waters of the Reed Sea to the North and South, those waters would have come rushing back as two raging walls picking up dirt, rocks, and other debris along the way.
To give you a practical understanding of the force involved, the average flash flood travels at 7-10 miles per hour and a tsunami at 10-20 miles an hour. At ten miles per hour water exerts more force that a 250 mph wind.
In either case, if you were the Egyptians, it would have been a truly fearsome sight to see and hear those walls of water 30, 20, or even 10 feet high – miles up the bed of the Reed Sea come rushing back towards you at 10 or 20 mph, all the while you, trapped right in the midst of that sea with no possibility of reaching the shore, stood in terror as those walls of water enveloped you.
Sunk to the Bottom of the Sea
This leads to another point often brought up, when discussing this subject. In Exodus 15, Moses, upon Israel’s safe crossing of the Reed Sea and the destruction of Pharaoh’s army, sings a song of praise unto Yahweh. In that song, Moses describes Yahweh’s parting of the Reed Sea as a blast of His nostrils and Pharaoh’s army is described as sinking into the depths of the sea.
Both of these descriptions are often used (by those who believe in a Gulf of Aqaba crossing) as proof that the body of water crossed by the Israelites must have been a deep body of water and thus the Heroopolis Gulf (Suez) of the Red Sea or as Isaiah described it the “tongue” of the Egyptian Sea would not qualify.
The context here should not be forgotten. Moses in Exodus 15 is singing a poetic song of praise to Yahweh. Such poetry is not bound by a strictly literal interpretation of events. The Egyptians sinking into the depths of the sea is a perfect example of such poetry.
Unless Pharaoh’s chariots were equipped with water skis and Pharaoh’s horses could walk on water, they didn’t literally sink into the depths of the Reed Sea, they were already there! When they were consumed by those raging walls of water they were already standing on the dry bed of the Reed Sea.
The Song of Solomon
In case you need further convincing there are some examples of poetic license in the Bible which were never intended to be taken in a strictly literal sense. Some of the Bible’s most extravagant poetry is found in the Song of Solomon like the following passage, where the prince’s daughter is described:
The Song of Solomon –
Thy neck is as a tower of ivory; thine eyes like the fishpools in Heshbon, by the gate of Bathrabbim: thy nose is as the tower of Lebanon which looketh toward Damascus…
This thy stature is like to a palm tree, and thy breasts to clusters of grapes. (Song of Solomon 7:4-7)
No reasonable student of the Bible takes these descriptions in their most literal sense. Why then should we demand that the Song of Moses in Exodus 15 be taken in a strictly literal sense, especially when that requires us to discard the most natural and reasonable description of events given in Exodus 14? Here is an excerpt of Moses’ song for comparison. As you read it really think about what Moses meant to be taken literally and what he intended to be poetic.
The Song of Moses –
Then sang Moses and the children of Israel this song unto YHWH, and spake, saying, I will sing unto YHWH, for he hath triumphed gloriously:
…the horse and his rider hath he thrown into the sea.
… Pharaoh’s chariots and his host hath he cast into the sea:
…depths have covered them: they sank into the bottom as a stone
…thy right hand, O YHWH, hath dashed in pieces the enemy.
…thou sentest forth thy wrath [charown], which consumed them as stubble.
…And with the blast of thy nostrils the waters were gathered together,
…the floods stood upright as an heap,
…and the depths were congealed in the heart of the sea.
…Thou didst blow with thy wind, the sea covered them:
… they sank as lead in the mighty waters.
(Exodus 15:1-10 excerpted)
As you can see here, Moses is clearly using poetic language to describe the real events of the Reed Sea crossing. To demand that this description of the events be taken in its most literal sense, in my opinion is not reasonable exegesis of the text.
One aspect of this Song I’d like to bring your attention to is the description of the destruction of Pharaoh’s armies by the waters of the Reed Sea as a result of Yahweh’s wrath – his charown.
It is hard to dismiss as coincidence that the Hebrew word for those destructive “walls” of water in Exodus 14 is also used in the Bible to describe Yahweh’s wrath, indignation, and fury. It is truly a fearful thing to fall into the hands of an angry God.
Chemah indeed!
Behold, a whirlwind of YHWH is gone forth in fury [chemah], even a grievous whirlwind: it shall fall grievously upon the head of the wicked. Jeremiah 23:19
Was Josephus Right or Wrong?
Over the years as I’ve tried to untangle some of the claims and counter claims regarding the location of the Reed Sea crossing and Mount Sinai, an account describing the topography near the Reed Sea crossing by the first century Jewish historian Josephus keeps coming up. Mr. Richardson gives a good example of how many of his peers view Josephus’ account:
Josephus’s Reed Sea
Outside of the Bible, further evidence for the crossing at the Gulf of Aqaba may be found in the testimony of Josephus, the first-century Jewish historian. Josephus specifically describes the location of the miraculous sea crossing as having been closely surrounded on both sides by impassably tall and rugged mountains: (Richardson, Joel. Mount Sinai in Arabia: The True Location Revealed (Kindle Locations 473-476). WinePress Media. Kindle Edition.)
For further reference here is Josephus’ account:
Now when the Egyptians had overtaken the Hebrews, they prepared to fight them, and by their multitude they drove them into a narrow place; for the number that pursued after them was six hundred chariots, with fifty thousand horsemen, and two hundred thousand footmen, all armed. They also seized on the passes by which they imagined the Hebrews might flee, shutting them up {b} between inaccessible precipices and the sea; 325 for there was on each side a ridge of mountains that terminated at the sea, which were impassable by reason of their roughness, and obstructed their flight; therefore they pressed there upon the Hebrews with their army, where [the ridges of] the mountains were closed with the sea; which army they placed at the pass where the mountains abuts the sea, that so they might deprive them of any passage into the plain. (Antiquities of the Jews 2:324-325)
What most commentators don’t tell you is, that Josephus limits this location to the “third day” from Israel’s departure from Ramsees. Those like Mr. Richardson, who do mention the chronological limiting statements of Josephus often dismiss Josephus’ statements as errors. Here is how Mr. Richardson explains this conundrum:
Some have objected to using Josephus as a support for an Aqaba crossing because elsewhere he states that the journey out of Egypt to the Yam Suph took only three days.15 Josephus’s error is likely because he determined the time it took to reach the Yam Suph by assuming that the Israelite’s two encampments meant two nights at camp and three days of actual travel. His erroneous calculations, however, do not do away with the fact that he viewed the sea crossing to be at Aqaba. (Richardson, Joel. Mount Sinai in Arabia: The True Location Revealed (Kindle Locations 485-490). WinePress Media. Kindle Edition.)
To cherry pick the evidence in this way leaves a big credibility gap. Either Josephus had a good idea of what happened and where it happened or his account is hopelessly flawed and none of it should be trusted. In my opinion, if we are going to use Josephus’ accounts as part of our evidence for the location of the Reed Sea crossing then we must make a reasonable effort to include all his chronological and geographical statements into the matrix. Absent additional clarifications from Josephus’ own writings we do not have the luxury of picking and choosing the part of his account we want to believe.
Below are several maps showing the topography of Egypt, the Reed Sea, and the only geographical features that might be considered “mountains” within a “third day” journey from Ramses/Goshen. Keep in mind as you look at these maps, that they do not account for nearly 3500 years of erosion nor the leveling/construction efforts of the Egyptians. (For example the ridges along Wady Tumilat which are heavily populated today). You can draw your own conclusions as to whether Josephus’ account is credible or not.
[DISPLAY_ULTIMATE_PLUS]
Courtesy Google Earth Maps – Showing the once extensive cliffs of Jebel Attaga and 3500 years of erosion
So the Hebrews went out of Egypt, while the Egyptians wept, and repented that they had treated them so harshly. Now they took their journey by Letopolis, a place at that time deserted, but where Babylon was built afterward, when Cambyses laid Egypt waste: but as they went away hastily, on the third day they came to a place called Baalzephon, on the Reed Sea; (Antiquities of the Jews 2:315)
…and they [the Egyptians] thought they should easily overcome them, as they had no armour, and would be weary with their journey; so they made haste in their pursuit, and asked of everyone they met which way they were gone. And, indeed, that land was difficult to be travelled over, not only by armies, but by single persons. As also he led them this way on account of the Philistines, who had quarrelled with them, and hated them of old, that by all means they might not know of their departure, for their country is near to that of Egypt; (Antiquities of the Jews 2:321-322)
Why is Saudi Arabia and the Gulf of Aqaba So Attractive
One of the things that makes the Gulf of Aqaba crossing and the mountains of Saudi Arabia so attractive as the location of the Reed Sea crossing and Mount Sinai, are some of the anecdotal claims (historical and geographical) made about the area and its history. Let’s look at some of those claims.
Where was the Midian Homeland of Jethro and Moses?
A confusing aspect of this discussion is the question of the location of the Midian homeland of Jethro and Moses. Unfortunately, this specific question gets confused with the more general question of the boundaries of ancient Midian territory.
According to the Biblical text, the Midianites were ruled by several kings or princes. In the Biblical record, these kings often banded together to attack Israel or defend their own territory. In any case, there is no indication from the Biblical text that there was a single capital city of Midianites, nor is there any indication in the Bible (that I’m aware of) that Jethro (Reuel) was associated with any particular city of the Midianites.
This is important to keep in mind. Jethro was a priest or prince of the Midianites, but he also had flocks of sheep. In a desert environment, those who shepherd flocks must continually move their flocks in order to find them food and so that the ground does not become overgrazed. This would have required a nomadic lifestyle. In Jethro’s case, it was his daughters who shepherded his flocks. It’s also worth mentioning that at their initial encounter with Moses, the particular watering hole was used by other (Midianite?) shepherds.
A City or Territory?
Take a look at the map below. The map provides a rough idea of the territory of the Midianites based upon Biblical and historical sources. As you can see, Midianite territory was a rather large expanse, the borders of which varied over the centuries as they lost or gained land based upon conquest and defeat. There wasn’t just one capital city of the Midianites, as stated above the Midianites were ruled by several kings. If Jethro was associated with a city of the Midianites, what Biblical facts allow us to assume that Jethro was associated with the ancient city of Madian/Madiam/Midiam, the city known today by the name of al-Bad?
Joel Richardson sums up this challenge in the following quote from Chapter 5 of his book:
Beyond being east of the Gulf of Aqaba, the Bible gives us a second critical witness regarding the location of Mount Sinai. As we will see, Scripture describes Mount Sinai as being either within the territory of, or beside the land of Midian. Thus, determining where Midian was located is essential. (Richardson, Joel. Mount Sinai in Arabia: The True Location Revealed (Kindle Locations 535-537). WinePress Media. Kindle Edition.)
In the following passage Mr. Richardson goes on to argue against the traditional site of Mount Sinai by claiming that the city of al-Bad (the ancient location associated with Madian/Madiam/Midiam) was the ancient capital of the Midianites.
Some have suggested that because many translations place Sinai west of Midian, this rules out Jebel al-Lawz as it is roughly twelve to fifteen miles east of the ancient capital city of Midian, now called al-Bad. This argument has also been used to support the traditional site, pointing out that it is indeed to the west of Midian. The obvious problem of course is that Moses did not place Jethro’s flocks on a boat and sail west across the Gulf of Aqaba. Instead, if he had gone to the traditional site, he would have had to have traveled well over a hundred miles north, then over another hundred miles southwest to reach the mountain. (Richardson, Joel. Mount Sinai in Arabia: The True Location Revealed (Kindle Locations 557-561). WinePress Media. Kindle Edition.)
There is certainly no indication within the text that Moses traveled through multiple deserts, through the territories of multiple foreign peoples to reach the mountain. (Richardson, Joel. Mount Sinai in Arabia: The True Location Revealed (Kindle Locations 568-569). WinePress Media. Kindle Edition.)
There are several difficulties with Mr. Richardson’s claims above.
First, if you are not careful you might miss the fact that Mr. Richardson inserts an unproven assumption into his arguments, which assumption he then uses as proof that the Sinai Peninsula could not have been the true location of Mount Sinai. In the passage above Mr. Richardson conflates “Midian” the territory with “Midian” the city. He then goes on to claims this location as the ancient capital of the Midianites and the implied home of Jethro and Moses. I can see no way to make such a determination from the Biblical text. Take a look for yourself:
Now when Pharaoh heard this thing, he sought to slay Moses. But Moses fled from the face of Pharaoh, and dwelt in the land of Midian: and he sat down by a well.
Now the priest of Midian had seven daughters: and they came and drew water, and filled the troughs to water their father’s flock. And the shepherds came and drove them away: but Moses stood up and helped them, and watered their flock. And when they came to Reuel their father, he said, How is it that ye are come so soon to day? And they said, An Egyptian delivered us out of the hand of the shepherds,…
And Moses was content to dwell with the man: and he gave Moses Zipporah his daughter…
Now Moses kept the flock of Jethro his father in law, the priest of Midian: and he led the flock to the backside of the desert, and came to the mountain of God, even to Horeb. (Exodus 2:15 – 3:1 excerpted for brevity)
As you can see from the above text, there is no basis to claim that the “land of Midian” refers to an ancient capital city of Midian. Midian is first described as a “land” or territory. At no point in the text does it clearly transition to a specific city in the land of Midian, let alone a city named “Midian”.
This means that any (Biblcial) argument that uses “Midian” the territory as toponym for “Midian” the city is purely speculative and without Biblical support. Further, any argument that depends on this city of “Midian” as it relates to a specific geographical location is also speculative and must be considered with caution.
I can’t help but wonder why Jethro couldn’t have been a priest or prince of some northern part of Midianite territory? If Jethro was indeed associated with a particular city, (which the Bible does not clearly indicate) why couldn’t that city have been in the northern parts of Midianite territory, where it overlapped with the Edomites and Amalekites?
Consider the following passages that indicate the Midianites (a.k.a. Kenites or Shechemites) dwelt in the general area of northern Midian territory and southern Israel. Also note, the Kenites according to the book of Samuel and the account of Josephus, dwelt in the midst of the Amalekites which at that time was southern Israel. Also consider that the Kenites weren’t just a branch of Midianite descendants from Jethro, but were also a people present in the land when Yahweh promised to Abraham that his seed would someday inherit their land. (see Gen. 15:14 below).
To me at least, this seems to suggest that Jethro and his descendants occupied the northern part of the Midianite kingdom.
In the same day YHWH made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river [nahar] of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: The [land of the] Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites,… Genesis 15:18-19
And the children of the Kenite, Moses’ father in law, went up out of the city of palm trees with the children of Judah into the wilderness of Judah, which lieth in the south of Arad; and they went and dwelt among the people. (Judges 1:16)
Now Heber the Kenite, which was of the children of Hobab the father in law of Moses, had severed himself from the Kenites, and pitched his tent unto the plain of Zaanaim, which is by Kedesh. 12 And they shewed Sisera that Barak the son of Abinoam was gone up to mount Tabor. (Judges 4:11-12)
And Moses said unto Hobab, the son of Raguel the Midianite, Moses’ father in law, (Numbers 10:29)
And Saul said unto the Kenites, Go, depart, get you down from among the Amalekites, lest I destroy you with them: for ye shewed kindness to all the children of Israel, when they came up out of Egypt. So the Kenites departed from among the Amalekites. 7 And Saul smote the Amalekites from Havilah until thou comest to Shur, that is over against Egypt. 8 And he took Agag the king of the Amalekites alive, and utterly destroyed all the people with the edge of the sword. (1 Samuel 15:6-8)
But when Saul had conquered all these Amalekites that reached from Pelusium of Egypt to the Red Sea, he laid waste all the rest of the enemy’s country: but for the nation of the Shechemites, he did not touch them, although they dwelt in the very middle of the country of Midian; for before the battle, Saul had sent to them, and ordered them to depart from there, lest they should be partakers of the miseries of the Amalekites; for he had a just occasion for saving them, since they were of the kindred of Raguel, Moses’ father-in-law. (Antiquities of the Jews 6:140)
From Arabia to the Wall of Egypt
By the way, did you note in 1 Samuel 15:6-8 above, that it indicates that Amalekite territory extended from Hivilah (a place in Arabia) unto the Shur (wall) that is over against Egypt. Fascinating, isn’t it, that there was a place in or by the border of Egypt called the “Wall”. As we learned in Part I & Part II of this series Egypt’s northeastern frontiers at the time of the Exodus were indeed protected by such a shur or wall. Naturally any “wilderness” inside or outside that Shur would have been called the “wilderness of Shur” or the Wilderness of the Wall. Pretty neat stuff!
The Journeys of Moses
Based upon the assumption that Midian was a city (not a territory), and the further assumption that Moses fled to this ancient capital city or the area surrounding it, Mr. Richardson puts forth an argument that the distance from Midian (the city) to Mount Sinai (traditional location) was too great for Moses to take Jethro’s flock there to graze. He argues as follows:
One could very reasonably say that Moses walked fifteen or perhaps even as much as thirty or more miles to graze his flocks somewhere within Midianite territory, but 450 to 500 miles is an extreme stretch to say the least. Without the text directly stating that Moses went on such an incredibly extended journey, we have no basis to make such claims. This problem is greatly amplified when many years later, Jethro visited Moses and all of Israel as they were camped at the mountain: (Richardson, Joel. Mount Sinai in Arabia: The True Location Revealed (Kindle Locations 573-577). WinePress Media. Kindle Edition.)
In my opinion there are several problems with this statement.
First of all, it seems rather incongruent to make the argument that it is an “extreme stretch” for one man and his flocks to have made the journey from Midian (the city) all the way to Mount Sinai in the Sinai Peninsula. Yet, Mr. Richardson indicates that he believes it utterly reasonable for the entire host of the Children of Israel, their sheep, and other livestock to make the equally difficult and lengthy journey from Egypt to area around Midian (the city).
Second, arguing against the traditional Sinai (or any Sinai) location, based upon unproven assumptions about Midian (the city) and Jethro’s & Moses’ relationship to that city is a speculative exercise that only confuses the subject.
Third, the above argument used by Mr. Richardson assumes that the traditional location of Mount Sinai is the only option to consider. If Mt. Sinai was further North, as some scholars suggest, and Jethro’s shepherding was in the northern part of Midianite territory, many of the challenges to Moses’, Jethro’s and Israel’s itineraries would disappear.
My point here is, that any exploration of this subject needs to consider all the available facts without unhelpful and misleading arguments that only support a single line of investigation. This is a fascinating and complex subject and a reasonable and balanced approach (in my opinion) is the best way to work out the complexities.
The Territory of Midian in Summary
In summary, the above evidence suggests that Midianite territory included the area around the northern part of the Aelantic Gulf (Aqaba) including parts of what is known today as southern Israel. In my opinion, the most reasonable rendering of the available facts suggests, that it was this part of Midianite territory to which Moses fled when leaving Egypt. Further, it provides a more central location from which the events described likely took place.
Who Was Shuaib?
This leads to a related subject concerning Jethro, the father in-law of Moses. One of anecdotal claims often stated as evidence that Jabal al-law and the mountains of Arabia are the real Mount Sinai is the so called “cave of Jethro”. Mr. Richardson explains it this way:
The Caves of Jethro
Several very important archeological sites in al-Bad are closely associated with Moses or his father-in-law Jethro, who the Muslims call Shuaib (transliterated variously as Shuy’ib, Sho’aib, or something similar). In fact, another name for al-Bad is Muhgair al-Shuaib, which means, the “Caves of Jethro.” At the center of this small town is a cluster of caves hewn into the hillside that are believed to be the ancient home of Jethro and Moses. (Richardson, Joel. Mount Sinai in Arabia: The True Location Revealed (Kindle Locations 690-694). WinePress Media. Kindle Edition.)
I think it should be noted here, that association between Shuaib and Jethro is unproven historical speculation and without any Biblical merit. Mr. Richardson is mistaken in his claim (above) that Muhgair al-Shuaib means “Caves of Jethro” this is simply not accurate. Muhagair al-Shuaib in Arabic simply means the Cave of Shuaib.
Name meanings:
- Shuaib = “who shows the right path”
- Jethro = “his abundance”
- Reuel (Jethro) = “friend of God”
A few other interesting anecdotes about Shuaib are worth noting. While Muhammad Ibn Ishaq, the 8th century Islamic historian, claims that Shuaib’s name translated in Syrian is Yahrun (Jethro), classical Islamic scholar Ibn Kathir Shu’ayb seems to contradict this by claiming that (Shuaib) prophesied to the Madyan people four generations after Abraham. (This would place him several centuries before the time of Moses and Jethro.) Neither historian provides any more context for their claims (that I could find).
Further, Islamic tradition also states that Shu’aib was sent to Madyan to tell them to repent of their evil. This implies that he did not live there. If indeed Madyan is the present day al-Bad, the fact there is a “cave of Shu’aib” near al-Bad does not prove that this was Shu’aib’s home town. After the people of Madyan refused to listen to Shu’aib, Islamic tradition claims that Allah sent judgment to destroy the Madyan people. According to tradition Shu’aib was not present when that judgment fell.
It should also be noted that Arabic traditions places the tomb of Shuaib in Jordan, lower Galilee or by some accounts the Sinai Peninsula. No tradition, that I’m aware of, places Shuaib’s tomb in the ancient city of Madyan (present day al-Bad).
The following are Quaranic references to Shu’aib:
[7:85] And to Madyan (We sent) their brother Shu’aib. He said: O my people! Serve Allah, you have no god other than Him; clear proof indeed has come to you from your Lord, therefore give full measure and weight and do not diminish to men their things, and do not make mischief in the land after its reform; this is better for you if you are believers:
[11:84] And to Madyan (We sent) their brother Shu’aib. He said: O my people! Serve Allah, you have no god other than He, and do not give short measure and weight: surely I see you in prosperity and surely I fear for you the punishment of an all-encompassing day.
[29:36] And to Madyan (We sent) their brother Shuaib, so he said: O my people! Serve Allah and fear the latter day and do not act corruptly in the land, making mischief. [29:37] But they rejected him, so a severe earthquake overtook them, and they became motionless bodies in their abode.
Local traditions and toponyms notwithstanding, there is no real contextual Biblical or archeological evidence (that I’m aware of) to back up the claims that Madyan (the present day al-Bad) was the home of Jethro or even the general location where Moses fled to when he left Egypt.
The Borders of Israel and Egypt
The Exodus has so many interrelated topics and complexities. One which I had not been aware of until reading Mr. Richardson’s book was the subject of the borders of Israel and Egypt. In his book Mr. Richardson claims the “brook of Egypt” was the border of Egypt. Further, that this border extended to the Gulf of Aqaba arm of the Reed Sea. Mr. Richardson explains it this way:
The Border of Egypt
Before we conclude our discussion of what the Bible says on this matter, we must also consider another critical Scriptural proof for a crossing at the Gulf of Aqaba. The Bible is quite clear in defining the border of Egypt. It is “the Brook of Egypt, now known as the Wadi el-Arish, the natural boundary between the southwestern Negev and the northeastern Sinai Peninsula regions.”19 Wadi el-Arish is 140 miles east of Port Said, Egypt (the northern end of the Suez Canal) and thirty miles west of the Gaza Strip. (Richardson, Joel. Mount Sinai in Arabia: The True Location Revealed (Kindle Locations 499-504). WinePress Media. Kindle Edition.)
When the Lord defined the promised land to Abram, He defined it as extending “from the river of Egypt [in the southwest] as far as the great river, the river Euphrates [in the north]” (Genesis 15:18). In other passages, we find the terms “the river of Egypt” and “the border of Egypt” used interchangeably. (Richardson, Joel. Mount Sinai in Arabia: The True Location Revealed (Kindle Locations 504-506). WinePress Media. Kindle Edition.)
Second, when the Bible specifically mentions the location of the Red Sea, it is always beside the city of Eilat and the land of Edom. (Richardson, Joel. Mount Sinai in Arabia: The True Location Revealed (Kindle Locations 525-526). WinePress Media. Kindle Edition.)
I admit, I’d never heard of the “brook of Egypt” as defining the border of Egypt as explained by Mr. Richardson . As I’ve been researching these claims, there are several things which I believe need further explanation.
First of all, none of the passages regarding the “brook of Egypt” that I could find are actually used to specifically define the border of Egypt, but rather they define the border of Israel at specific times during their ongoing inheritance of the land. This is an important distinction to make, because Yahweh did not allow Israel to inherit all of the Promised Land at once but rather “little by little”. This means that the borders of Israel have and will continue to change until the coming of the Yeshua. Let’s explore this a bit more.
The Nile Is the Future Border of Israel
Let’s start by looking at the original promise Yahweh made with Abraham. As we unpack this, I think you’ll see another perspective on the subject. Here is Yahweh’s original land promise to Abraham concerning Israel’s future border with Egypt.
In the same day YHWH made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river [nahar] of Egypt unto the great river, the river [nahar] Euphrates: (Genesis 15:18)
Please note, that the word used here for river is nahar. This word is most often, though not exclusively, used to refer to the river Euphrates. It is also important here not to confuse the Hebrew word nahar (river) with the Hebrew word Nachal (river, stream, brook, wadi, or valley). The word nahar in the Bible seems to be used mostly to refer to substantial rivers, not streams or brooks.
In contrast, nachal has a wide range of meanings including: stream, (streams as a division of a nahar-river), brook, flood, valley, and inheritance. There is not one clear example (that I’m aware of) of nahar (river) being used to describe the “brook of Egypt”. On the other hand nachal is used in the Bible to describe the seven branches of the Nile River (nahar).
The following verses give you a sense of how nahar is used in reference to the Nile River.
And YHWH spake unto Moses, Say unto Aaron, Take thy rod, and stretch out thine hand upon the waters of Egypt, upon their streams [nahar], upon their rivers [ye’or = canals], and upon their ponds, and upon all their pools of water, that they may become blood; and that there may be blood throughout all the land of Egypt, both in vessels of wood, and in vessels of stone. (Exodus 7:19)
And YHWH spake unto Moses, Say unto Aaron, Stretch forth thine hand with thy rod over the streams [nahar], over the rivers [ye’or = canals], and over the ponds, and cause frogs to come up upon the land of Egypt. (Exodus 8:5)
And the Egyptians will I give over into the hand of a cruel lord; and a fierce king shall rule over them, saith the Lord, YHWH of hosts. And the waters shall fail from the sea, and the river [nahar] shall be wasted and dried up. And they shall turn the rivers [nahar] far away; and the brooks [ye’or = canals] of defence shall be emptied and dried up: the reeds and flags shall wither. The paper reeds by the brooks, by the mouth of the brooks, and every thing sown by the brooks, shall wither, be driven away, and be no more. (Isaiah 19:4-7)
And YHWH shall utterly destroy the tongue of the Egyptian sea; and with his mighty wind shall he shake his hand over the river [nahar] , and shall smite it in the seven streams [nachal], and make men go over dryshod. (Isaiah 11:15)
Regarding Mr. Richardson’s claim above, that the “border of Egypt” and “river [nachal] of Egypt” are used interchangeably, I cannot find any clear example of such a usage.
Borders and Inheritances
As I was examining the Scriptures related to “brook (Nachal) of Egypt”, I learned something rather interesting. Some of you may have been aware of this, but it was surprising to me. The Hebrew nachal doesn’t just refer to small rivers, streams, brooks, floods, or valleys. In the original Hebrew (without vowel pointings / cantilation marks) the word nachal is also used to describe Israel’s inheritance. Here take a look:
As you can see from the above definitions of the word Nachal, it can be used to refer to a brook, wadi, valley, stream, as well as a land/border inheritance. This makes me wonder if the verses which have been translated “brook of Egypt” might also have the underlying connotation of “inheritance” in Egypt as it relates to Yahweh’s promise to Abraham that his seed would inherit the land all the way to the nahar (Nile River) of Egypt. You might also make the argument that instead of “brook of Egypt” the passages could also read the “valley of Egypt”. Something worth considering at least!
And YHWH appeared unto him, and said, Go not down into Egypt; dwell in the land which I shall tell thee of: Sojourn in this land, and I will be with thee, and will bless thee; for unto thee, and unto thy seed, I will give all these countries, and I will perform the oath which I sware unto Abraham thy father; And I will make thy seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and will give unto thy seed all these countries; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; (Genesis 26:2-4)
I will not drive them out from before thee in one year; lest the land become desolate, and the beast of the field multiply against thee. By little and little I will drive them out from before thee, until thou be increased, and inherit [nachal] the land. And I will set thy bounds from the Red sea even unto the sea of the Philistines, and from the desert unto the river: for I will deliver the inhabitants of the land into your hand; and thou shalt drive them out before thee. (Exodus 23:29-31)
Also at the same time Solomon kept the feast seven days, and all Israel with him, a very great congregation, from the entering in of Hamath unto the river [nachal] of Egypt. (2 Chronicles 7:8)
Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, thy servants, to whom thou swarest by thine own self, and saidst unto them, I will multiply your seed as the stars of heaven, and all this land that I have spoken of will I give unto your seed, and they shall inherit [nachal] it for ever. (Exodus 32:13)
And the border shall fetch a compass from Azmon unto the river [nachal] of Egypt, and the goings out of it shall be at the sea. (Numbers 34:5)
And he said, If now I have found grace in thy sight, O Lord, let my Lord, I pray thee, go among us; for it is a stiffnecked people; and pardon our iniquity and our sin, and take us for thine inheritance [nachal]. (Exodus 34:9)
Notwithstanding the land shall be divided by lot: according to the names of the tribes of their fathers they shall inherit [nachal]. (Numbers 26:55)
These are the countries which Moses did distribute for inheritance [nachal] in the plains of Moab, on the other side Jordan, by Jericho, eastward. (Joshua 13:32)
And YHWH shall inherit [nachal] Judah his portion in the holy land, and shall choose Jerusalem again. (Zechariah 2:12)
The Reed Sea and the Future Border of Egypt
In light of this, consider once again the following verses as they pertain to Israel’s future borders.
In the same day YHWH made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river [nahar] of Egypt unto the great river, the river [nahar] Euphrates: (Genesis 15:18)
I will not drive them out from before thee in one year; lest the land become desolate, and the beast of the field multiply against thee. By little and little I will drive them out from before thee, until thou be increased, and inherit [nachal] the land. And I will set thy bounds from the Red sea even unto the sea of the Philistines, and from the desert unto the river: for I will deliver the inhabitants of the land into your hand; and thou shalt drive them out before thee. (Exodus 23:29-31)
As we learned in Part II of this series, when the Bible refers to the Red (Reed) Sea, it is not just a reference to the Aelantic (Aqaba) Gulf of the Red Sea, but the Herooplictic (Suez) Gulf as well. So in Exodus 23 above, the Reed Sea without further context, must be taken as reference to both gulfs of the Red (Reed) Sea.
In other words, Israel’s future southern border most likely will not be a sharp triangle from the “brook of Egypt” (Wadi el-Arish) to the tip of the Gulf of Aqaba, but rather it will include all of the Sinai Peninsula from the Nile River to the Gulf of Aquaba.
Will Future Israel Include Mount Sinai
This brings me to a final point, that has nagged me about the discussion of Mount Sinai’s geographical location. As important as Mount Sinai is to the history of Israel and the Biblical narrative, why would it not someday be included within the future borders of Israel?
Based upon the above Biblical geographical descriptions, it appears to me that the only place where Mount Sinai would not be included in the future borders of Israel is if it was located in present day Saudi Arabia.
Please I encourage you to do your Berean duty and see if these things be so.
Maranatha.
Part I – Is Mount Sinai in Saudi Arabia
Part II – The Reed Sea Crossing: Which Gulf of the Red Sea?
Part III – Israel’s Crossing of the Reed Sea: The Geographical & Chronological Context
Part IV – Israel’s Crossing of the Reed Sea: Applying the Golden Rule of Bible Interpretation
Part V – The Exodus & Reed Sea Crossing: Symbols of the Bible’s redemptive Message